Ethical issues of participant recruitment in surgical clinical trials

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 3184-3187

  Angelos, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EQUIPOISE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PLACEBO EFFECT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SHAM PROCEDURE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SURGEON;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84883753886     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3178-0     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Taylor T. Opening statement of the prosecution, December 9, 1946. In: Annas GJ, editor. The Nazi doctors and Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
2. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes Health and Office for Human Research Protections. The Nuremberg Code. 2013. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html. Accessed 20 June 2013.
3. Beauchamp TL. The Belmont Report. In: Emanuel EJ, editor. The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008:149-55.
4. Angelos P. Sham surgery in research: a surgeon's view. Am J Bioethics. 2003;3:65-6.
5. Bosk CL. Forgive and remember: managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979:30.
6. Fried C. Medical experimentation: personal integrity and social policy. New York: American Elsevier; 1974.