Fits to SO(10) grand unified models

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 9, 2013, Pages

  Dueck, Alexander ^a   Rodejohann, Werner ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR KERNPHYSIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; GUT

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883753788     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2013)024     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. R. Slansky, Group theory for unified model building, Phys. Rept. 79 (1981) 1 [ INSPIRE ].
2. G.G. Ross, Grand unified theories, Westview Press, U.S.A. (1985).
3. B. Dutta, Y. Mimura and R. Mohapatra, Suppressing proton decay in the minimal SO(10) model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 091804 [ hep-ph/0412105 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 40620597)
4. B. Dutta, Y. Mimura and R. Mohapatra, Neutrino mixing predictions of a minimal SO(10) model with suppressed proton decay, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 075009 [ hep-ph/0507319 ] [ INSPIRE ].
5. G. Senjanović, SO(10): a theory of fermion masses and mixings, hep-ph/0612312 [ INSPIRE ].
6. K. Matsuda, T. Fukuyama and H. Nishiura, SO(10) GUT and quark lepton mass matrices, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 053001 [ hep-ph/9906433 ] [ INSPIRE ].
7. S. Dev, S. Kumar, S. Verma, S. Gupta and R. Gautam, Four zero texture fermion mass matrices in SO(10) GUT, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1940 [ arXiv:1203.1403 ] [ INSPIRE ].
8. C. Das and M. Parida, New formulas and predictions for running fermion masses at higher scales in SM, 2 HDM and MSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 20 (2001) 121 [ hep-ph/0010004 ] [ INSPIRE ].
9. Z.-z. Xing, H. Zhang and S. Zhou, Updated values of running quark and lepton masses, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 113016 [ arXiv:0712.1419 ] [ INSPIRE ].
10. G. Ross and M. Serna, Unification and fermion mass structure, Phys. Lett. B 664 (2008) 97 [ arXiv:0704.1248 ] [ INSPIRE ].
11. 2 GUT, Phys. Lett. B 643 (2006) 182 [ hep-ph/0607197 ] [ INSPIRE ].
12. T. Fukuyama, K. Matsuda and H. Nishiura, Zero texture model and SO(10) GUT, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 22 (2007) 5325 [ hep-ph/0702284 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. G. Altarelli and G. Blankenburg, Different SO(10) paths to fermion masses and mixings, JHEP 03 (2011) 133 [ arXiv:1012.2697 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. A.S. Joshipura and K.M. Patel, Fermion masses in SO(10) models, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 095002 [ arXiv:1102.5148 ] [ INSPIRE ].
15. F. Buccella, D. Falcone, C.S. Fong, E. Nardi and G. Ricciardi, Squeezing out predictions with leptogenesis from SO(10), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 035012 [ arXiv:1203.0829 ] [ INSPIRE ].
16. GUT, JHEP 08 (2013) 021 [ arXiv:1305.1001 ] [ INSPIRE ].
17. F. Vissani and A.Y. Smirnov, Neutrino masses and b-τ unification in the supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 341 (1994) 173 [ hep-ph/9405399 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner and M. Ratz, Neutrino mass matrix running for nondegenerate seesaw scales, Phys. Lett. B 538 (2002) 87 [ hep-ph/0203233 ] [ INSPIRE ].
19. DOUBLE-CHOOZ collaboration, Y. Abe et al., Indication for the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos in the Double CHOOZ experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 131801 [ arXiv:1112.6353 ] [ INSPIRE ].
20. DAYA-BAY collaboration, F. An et al., Observation of electron- antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 171803 [ arXiv:1203.1669 ] [ INSPIRE ].
21. RENO collaboration, J. Ahn et al., Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 191802 [ arXiv:1204.0626 ] [ INSPIRE ].
22. B. Bajc, A. Melfo, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, Yukawa sector in non-supersymmetric renormalizable SO(10), Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 055001 [ hep-ph/0510139 ] [ INSPIRE ].
23. R. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440 [ INSPIRE ].
24. K. Babu and R. Mohapatra, Predictive neutrino spectrum in minimal SO(10) grand unification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2845 [ hep-ph/9209215 ] [ INSPIRE ].
25. Y. Mambrini, K.A. Olive, J. Quevillon and B. Zaldivar, Gauge coupling unification and non-equilibrium thermal dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 241306 [ arXiv:1302.4438 ] [ INSPIRE ].
26. S. Bertolini, L. Di Luzio and M. Malinsky, Intermediate mass scales in the non-supersymmetric SO(10) grand unification: a reappraisal, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 015013 [ arXiv:0903.4049 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. H. Goh, R. Mohapatra and S. Nasri, SO(10) symmetry breaking and type-II seesaw, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 075022 [ hep-ph/0408139 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. A. Melfo, A. Ramirez and G. Senjanović, Type II see-saw dominance in SO(10), Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 075014 [ arXiv:1005.0834 ] [ INSPIRE ].
29. S. Bertolini, L. Di Luzio and M. Malinsky, On the vacuum of the minimal nonsupersymmetric SO(10) unification, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 035015 [ arXiv:0912.1796 ] [ INSPIRE ].
30. S. Bertolini, L. Di Luzio and M. Malinsky, Seesaw scale in the minimal renormalizable SO(10) grand unification, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095014 [ arXiv:1202.0807 ] [ INSPIRE ].
31. S. Bertolini, L. Di Luzio and M. Malinsky, Light color octet scalars in the minimal SO(10) grand unification, arXiv:1302.3401 [ INSPIRE ].
32. S. Bertolini, T. Schwetz and M. Malinsky, Fermion masses and mixings in SO(10) models and the neutrino challenge to SUSY GUTs, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 115012 [ hep-ph/0605006 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. L. Lavoura, Predicting the neutrino spectrum in minimal SO(10) grand unification, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 5440 [ hep-ph/9306297 ] [ INSPIRE ].
34. B. Brahmachari and R. Mohapatra, Unified explanation of the solar and atmospheric neutrino puzzles in a minimal supersymmetric SO(10) model, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 015001 [ hep-ph/9710371 ] [ INSPIRE ].
35. B. Bajc, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, How neutrino and charged fermion masses are connected within minimal supersymmetric SO(10), PoS(HEP2001)198 [ hep-ph/0110310 ] [ INSPIRE ].
36. B. Bajc, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, b-τ unification and large atmospheric mixing: a case for noncanonical seesaw, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 051802 [ hep-ph/0210207 ] [ INSPIRE ].
37. H. Goh, R. Mohapatra and S.-P. Ng, Minimal SUSY SO(10), b τ unification and large neutrino mixings, Phys. Lett. B 570 (2003) 215 [ hep-ph/0303055 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. H. Goh, R. Mohapatra and S.-P. Ng, Minimal SUSY SO(10) model and predictions for neutrino mixings and leptonic CP-violation, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 115008 [ hep-ph/0308197 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. C.S. Aulakh, B. Bajc, A. Melfo, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, The minimal supersymmetric grand unified theory, Phys. Lett. B 588 (2004) 196 [ hep-ph/0306242 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. C.S. Aulakh and A. Girdhar, SO(10) MSGUT: spectra, couplings and threshold effects, Nucl. Phys. B 711 (2005) 275 [ hep-ph/0405074 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 40317438)
41. S. Bertolini, M. Frigerio and M. Malinsky, Fermion masses in SUSY SO(10) with type-II seesaw: A Non-minimal predictive scenario, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 095002 [ hep-ph/0406117 ] [ INSPIRE ].
42. B. Bajc, A. Melfo, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, The minimal supersymmetric grand unified theory. 1. Symmetry breaking and the particle spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 035007 [ hep-ph/0402122 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. B. Bajc, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, Probing the nature of the seesaw in renormalizable SO(10), Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 093002 [ hep-ph/0402140 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. C.S. Aulakh and S.K. Garg, MSGUT: From bloom to doom, Nucl. Phys. B 757 (2006) 47 [ hep-ph/0512224 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 44597295)
45. K. Babu and C. Macesanu, Neutrino masses and mixings in a minimal SO(10) model, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 115003 [ hep-ph/0505200 ] [ INSPIRE ].
46. S. Bertolini and M. Malinsky, On CP-violation in minimal renormalizable SUSY SO(10) and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 055021 [ hep-ph/0504241 ] [ INSPIRE ].
47. B. Bajc, A. Melfo, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, Fermion mass relations in a supersymmetric SO(10) theory, Phys. Lett. B 634 (2006) 272 [ hep-ph/0511352 ] [ INSPIRE ].
48. Z ) in the NMSGUT, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24 (2009) 1711 [ arXiv:0710.4018 ] [ INSPIRE ].
49. B. Bajc, I. Dorsner and M. Nemevšek, Minimal SO(10) splits supersymmetry, JHEP 11 (2008) 007 [ arXiv:0809.1069 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. 13, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 053005 [ arXiv:1107.2378 ] [ INSPIRE ].
51. K. Matsuda, Y. Koide, T. Fukuyama and H. Nishiura, How far can the SO(10) two Higgs model describe the observed neutrino masses and mixings?, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 033008 [Erratum ibid. D 65 (2002) 079904] [ hep-ph/0108202 ] [ INSPIRE ].
52. U. Langenfeld, S. Moch and P. Uwer, Measuring the running top-quark mass, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 054009 [ arXiv:0906.5273 ] [ INSPIRE ].
53. A.H. Hoang, What top mass is measured at the LHC?, talk given at Strong interactions: from methods to structures, February 12-16, Bad Honnef, Germany (2011).
54. A.H. Hoang and I.W. Stewart, Top mass measurements from jets and the Tevatron top-quark mass, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 185 (2008) 220 [ arXiv:0808.0222 ] [ INSPIRE ].
55. B. Dutta, Y. Mimura and R. Mohapatra, Neutrino masses and mixings in a predictive SO(10) model with CKM CP-violation, Phys. Lett. B 603 (2004) 35 [ hep-ph/0406262 ] [ INSPIRE ].
56. W. Grimus and H. Kuhbock, A renormalizable SO(10) GUT scenario with spontaneous CP-violation, Eur. Phys. J. C 51 (2007) 721 [ hep-ph/0612132 ] [ INSPIRE ].
57. C.S. Aulakh and S.K. Garg, The new minimal supersymmetric GUT: spectra, RG analysis and fitting formulae, hep-ph/0612021 [ INSPIRE ].
58. C. Aulakh and R.N. Mohapatra, Implications of supersymmetric SO(10) grand unification, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 217 [ INSPIRE ].
59. T. Clark, T.-K. Kuo and N. Nakagawa, A SO(10) supersymmetric grand unified theory, Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 26 [ INSPIRE ].
60. C.S. Aulakh, B. Bajc, A. Melfo, A. Rasin and G. Senjanović, SO(10) theory of R-parity and neutrino mass, Nucl. Phys. B 597 (2001) 89 [ hep-ph/0004031 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 33378264)
61. N. Oshimo, Antisymmetric Higgs representation in SO(10) for neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 095010 [ hep-ph/0206239 ] [ INSPIRE ].
62. N. Oshimo, Model for neutrino mixing based on SO(10), Nucl. Phys. B 668 (2003) 258 [ hep-ph/0305166 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 37041683)
63. C.S. Aulakh, Pinning down the new minimal supersymmetric GUT, Phys. Lett. B 661 (2008) 196 [ arXiv:0710.3945 ] [ INSPIRE ].
64. C.S. Aulakh and S.K. Garg, The new minimal supersymmetric GUT: spectra, RG analysis and fermion fits, Nucl. Phys. B 857 (2012) 101 [ arXiv:0807.0917 ] [ INSPIRE ].
65. GUT in SO(10), JHEP 09 (2011) 137 [ arXiv:1105.5943 ] [ INSPIRE ].
66. B. Dutta, Y. Mimura and R.N. Mohapatra, Proton decay and μ → e + γ connection in a renormalizable SO(10) GUT for neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 075008 [ arXiv:1302.2574 ] [ INSPIRE ].
67. M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. Salvado and T. Schwetz, Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical look at present precision, JHEP 12 (2012) 123 [ arXiv:1209.3023 ] [ INSPIRE ].
68. G. Fogli et al., Global analysis of neutrino masses, mixings and phases: entering the era of leptonic CP-violation searches, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 013012 [ arXiv:1205.5254 ] [ INSPIRE ].
69. D. Forero, M. Tortola and J. Valle, Global status of neutrino oscillation parameters after Neutrino-2012, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 073012 [ arXiv:1205.4018 ] [ INSPIRE ].
70. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [ arXiv:1207.7214 ] [ INSPIRE ].
71. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [ arXiv:1207.7235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
72. J. Nelder and R. Mead, A simplex method for function minimization, Comp. J. 7 (1965) 308.
73. rd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2007).
74. rd edition, Network Theory Ltd, U.K. (2009).
75. H.E. Haber, R. Hempfling and A.H. Hoang, Approximating the radiatively corrected Higgs mass in the minimal supersymmetric model, Z. Phys. C 75 (1997) 539 [ hep-ph/9609331 ] [ INSPIRE ].
76. S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, M. Ratz and M.A. Schmidt, Running neutrino mass parameters in see-saw scenarios, JHEP 03 (2005) 024 [ hep-ph/0501272 ] [ INSPIRE ].
77. P.H. Chankowski and S. Pokorski, Quantum corrections to neutrino masses and mixing angles, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17 (2002) 575 [ hep-ph/0110249 ] [ INSPIRE ].
78. L.J. Hall, R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid, The top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7048 [ hep-ph/9306309 ] [ INSPIRE ].
79. M.S. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski and C. Wagner, Electroweak symmetry breaking and bottom-top Yukawa unification, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 269 [ hep-ph/9402253 ] [ INSPIRE ].
80. R. Hempfling, Yukawa coupling unification with supersymmetric threshold corrections, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6168 [ INSPIRE ].
81. T. Blazek, S. Raby and S. Pokorski, Finite supersymmetric threshold corrections to CKM matrix elements in the large tan β regime, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 4151 [ hep-ph/9504364 ] [ INSPIRE ].
82. - revisited, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 014016 [ hep-ph/0702267 ] [ INSPIRE ].
83. S. Antusch and M. Spinrath, Quark and lepton masses at the GUT scale including SUSY threshold corrections, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 075020 [ arXiv:0804.0717 ] [ INSPIRE ].
84. M. Holthausen, K.S. Lim and M. Lindner, Planck scale boundary conditions and the Higgs mass, JHEP 02 (2012) 037 [ arXiv:1112.2415 ] [ INSPIRE ].
85. J. Elias-Miro et al., Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 222 [ arXiv:1112.3022 ] [ INSPIRE ].
86. Z.-z. Xing, H. Zhang and S. Zhou, Impacts of the Higgs mass on vacuum stability, running fermion masses and two-body Higgs decays, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 013013 [ arXiv:1112.3112 ] [ INSPIRE ].
87. G. Degrassi et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO, JHEP 08 (2012) 098 [ arXiv:1205.6497 ] [ INSPIRE ].
88. I. Masina, The Higgs boson and top quark masses as tests of electroweak vacuum stability, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 053001 [ arXiv:1209.0393 ] [ INSPIRE ].
89. J. Casas, V. Di Clemente, A. Ibarra and M. Quirós, Massive neutrinos and the Higgs mass window, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 053005 [ hep-ph/9904295 ] [ INSPIRE ].
90. W. Rodejohann and H. Zhang, Impact of massive neutrinos on the Higgs self-coupling and electroweak vacuum stability, JHEP 06 (2012) 022 [ arXiv:1203.3825 ] [ INSPIRE ].
91. R. Hempfling and B.A. Kniehl, On the relation between the fermion pole mass and MS Yukawa coupling in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1386 [ hep-ph/9408313 ] [ INSPIRE ].
92. W. Rodejohann, Neutrino-less double β decay and particle physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20 (2011) 1833 [ arXiv:1106.1334 ] [ INSPIRE ].
93. W. Rodejohann, Neutrinoless double β decay and neutrino physics, J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 124008 [ arXiv:1206.2560 ] [ INSPIRE ].
94. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 1. Wave function renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 83 [ INSPIRE ].
95. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 2. Yukawa couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 236 (1984) 221 [ INSPIRE ].
96. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 3. Scalar quartic couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 70 [ INSPIRE ].
97. M.-x. Luo and Y. Xiao, Two loop renormalization group equations in the standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 011601 [ hep-ph/0207271 ] [ INSPIRE ].
98. B. Grzadkowski and M. Lindner, Nonlinear evolution of Yukawa couplings, Phys. Lett. B 193 (1987) 71 [ INSPIRE ].
99. B. Grzadkowski, M. Lindner and S. Theisen, Nonlinear evolution of Yukawa couplings in the double Higgs and supersymmetric extensions of the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 198 (1987) 64 [ INSPIRE ].