Comparison of the 1987 ACR and 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: A prospective cohort study

Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 362-368

  Berglin, E ^a,b   Dahlqvist, S R ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORTICOSTEROID; METHOTREXATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOOT RADIOGRAPHY; HAND RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYNOVITIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ANTIRHEUMATIC AGENTS; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOOT JOINTS; HAND JOINTS; HUMANS; MALE; METHOTREXATE; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHEUMATOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; SYNOVITIS;

EID: 84883736213     PISSN: 03009742     EISSN: 15027732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2013.776103     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315-24.
2. Kaarela K, Kauppi MJ, Lehtinen KES. The value of the ACR 1987 criteria in very early rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1995;24;279-81.
3. Harrison BJ, Symmons DP, Barrett EM, Silman AJ. The performance of the 1987 ACR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a population based cohort of patients with early inflammatory polyarthritis. American Rheumatism Association. J Rheumatol 1998;25:2324-30.
4. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569-81.
5. Van der Linden M, Knevel R, Huizinga T, van der Helm-van Mil A. Classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:37-42
6. Britsemmer K, Ursum J, Gerritsen M, van Tuyl L, van Schaardenburg D. Validation of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: slight improvement over the 1987 ACR criteria. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1468-70.
7. Cader MZ, Filer A, Hazlehurst J, de Pablo P, Buckley CD, Raza K. Performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with 1987 ACR criteria in a very early synovitis cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:949-55.
8. Kaneko Y, Kuwana M, Kameda H, Takeuchi T. Sensitivity and specificity of 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria. Rheumatology 2011;50:1268-74.
9. Cornec D, Varache S, Morvan J, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Berthelot JM, Le Henaff-Bourhis C, et al. Comparison of the ACR 1987 and ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for predicting 10-year diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2012;79:581-5.
10. Kaarela K, Kauppi J, Kauppi M. The 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in the Heinola inception cohort - diagnoses confirmed by long-term follow-up. Clin Rheumatol 2012;31:547-51.
11. de Hair MJ, Lehmann KA, van de Sande MG, Maijer KI, Gerlag DM, Tak PP. The clinical picture of rheumatoid arthritis according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria: is this still the same disease? Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:389-93.
12. Reneses S, Pestana L, García A. Comparison of the 1987 ACR criteria and the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria in an inception cohort of patients with recent-onset inflammatory polyarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2012;30:417-20.
13. Kennish L, Labitigan M, Budoff S, Filopoulos MT, McCracken WA, Swearingen CJ, et al. Utility of the new rheumatoid arthritis 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in routine clinical care. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001117.
14. Biliavska I, Stamm TA, Martinez-Avila J, Huizinga TW, Landewe RB, Steiner G, et al. Application of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with very early inflammatory arthritis: analysis of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in the SAVE study cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. Published online: 15 September 2012. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201909.
15. Humphreys JH, Verstappen SM, Hyrich KL, Chipping JR, Marshall T, Symmons DP. The incidence of rheumatoid arthritis in the UK: comparisons using the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria an/d the 1987 ACR classification criteria. Results from the Norfolk Arthritis Register. Ann Rheum Dis. Published online: 3 September 2012. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201960.
16. Makinen H, Kaarela K, Huhtala H, Hannonen P, Korpela M, Sokka T. Do the 2010 ACR/EULAR or ACR 1987 classification criteria predict erosive disease in early arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis. Published online: 21 November 2012. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201943.
17. Raja R, Chapman PT, O'Donnell JL, Ipenburg J, Frampton C, Hurst M, et al. Comparison of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism and the 1987 American Rheumatism Association classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in an early arthritis cohort in New Zealand. J Rheumatol 2012;39:2098-103.
18. Larsen A. How to apply Larsen score in evaluating radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis in long-term studies. J Rheumatol 1995;22:1974-5.
19. Alves C, Luime JJ, van Zeben D, Huisman AM, Weel AE, Barendregt PJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and two diagnostic algorithms in an early arthritis clinic (REACH). Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1645-7.
20. Palosuo T, Tilvis R, Strandberg T, Aho K. Filaggrin related antibodies among the aged. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:261-3.