Women's land rights and children's human capital in vietnam

World Development

Volumn 54, Issue , 2014, Pages 18-31

  Menon, Nidhiya ^a   Van Der Meulen Rodgers, Yana ^b   Nguyen, Huong ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Child health; Education; Land use rights; Property rights; Vietnam; Women

Indexed keywords

CHILD HEALTH; EDUCATION; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE; HUMAN CAPITAL; LAND RIGHTS; LAND USE; PROPERTY RIGHTS; WOMENS STATUS; CHILD CARE; LAND MARKET;

VIET NAM;

NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 84883728244     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agarwal B. A field of one's own: Gender and land rights in south Asia 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. Allendorf K. Do women's land rights promote empowerment and child health in Nepal?. World Development 2007, 35(11):1975-1988.
3. Bertrand M., Duflo E., Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2004, 119(1):249-275.
4. Besley T., Ghatak M. Property rights and economic development. Handbook of development economics 2010, Vol. 5:4525-4596. Elsevier, Oxford and Amsterdam.
5. Bhattacharyya M., Bedi A., Chhachhi A. Marital violence and women's employment and property status: Evidence from north Indian villages. World Development 2011, 39(9):1676-1689.
6. Datta N. Joint titling: A win-win policy? Gender and property rights in urban informal settlements in Chandigarh, India. Feminist Economics 2006, 12(1-2):271-298.
7. Deere C.D., León M. Who owns the land? Gender and land-titling programs in Latin America. Journal of Agrarian Change 2001, 1(3):440-467.
8. Deere C.D., Twyman J. Asset ownership and egalitarian decision making in dual-headed households in Ecuador. Review of Radical Political Economics 2012, 44(3):313-320.
9. Deininger K. Land policies for growth and poverty reduction 2003, World Bank, Washington, DC.
10. Deininger K., Feder G. Land institutions and land markets. Handbook of agricultural economics 2001, Vol. 1:288-331. Elsevier, Oxford and Amsterdam.
11. Deininger K., Feder G. Land registration, governance, and development: Evidence and implications for policy. World Bank Research Observer 2009, 24(2):233-266.
12. Deininger K., Goyal A., Nagarajan H. Women's inheritance rights and intergenerational transmission of resources in India. Journal of Human Resources 2013, 48(1):114-141.
13. Deininger K., Jin S. Land sales and rental markets in transition: Evidence from rural Vietnam. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 2008, 70(1):67-101.
14. Do Q.T., Iyer L. Land titling and rural transition in Vietnam. Economic Development and Cultural Change 2008, 56(3):531-579.
15. Doss C. The effects of intrahousehold property ownership on expenditure patterns in Ghana. Journal of African Economies 2006, 15(1):149-180.
16. Duong P.B., Izumida Y. Rural development finance in Vietnam: A microeconometric analysis of household surveys. World Development 2002, 30(2):319-335.
17. Ekman B., Liem N.T., Duc H.A., Axelson H. Health insurance reform in Vietnam: A review of recent developments and future challenges. Health Policy and Planning 2008, 23:252-263.
18. Feder G., Nishio A. The benefits of land registration and titling: Economic and social perspectives. Land Use Policy 1999, 15(1):25-43.
19. Field E. Fertility responses to land titling programs: The roles of ownership security and the distribution of household assets 2003, Harvard University, Mimeo, Cambridge, MA.
20. Garikipati S. Agricultural wage work, seasonal migration and the widening gender gap: Evidence from a semi-arid region of Andhra Pradesh. European Journal of Development Research 2008, 20(4):629-648.
21. General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO). (2005). Statistical handbook of Vietnam. Hanoi: GSO. Available from.http://www.gso.gov.vn.
22. General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO). (2008a). Statistical handbook of Vietnam. Hanoi: GSO. Available from.http://www.gso.gov.vn.
23. General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO). (2008b). Statistical yearbook of Vietnam. Hanoi: GSO. Available from.http://www.gso.gov.vn.
24. General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO). (2009). Statistical handbook of Vietnam. Hanoi: GSO. Available from.http://www.gso.gov.vn.
25. General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO). 2012. Consumer Price Index by Month of the Year. Hanoi: GSO. Available at.http://www.gso.gov.vn.
26. Hare D., Li Y., Englander D. Land management in rural China and its gender implications. Feminist Economics 2007, 13(3-4):35-61.
27. Jackson C. Gender analysis of land: Beyond land rights for women?. Journal of Agrarian Change 2003, 3(1-2):453-480.
28. Kumar N., Quisumbing A. Inheritance practices and gender differences in poverty and well-being in rural Ethiopia. Development Policy Review 2012, 30(5):573-595.
29. Kumar N., Quisumbing A. Beyond "Death Do Us Part": The long-term implications of divorce perceptions on women's well-being and child schooling in rural Ethiopia. World Development 2012, 40(12):2478-2489.
30. Kumar N., Quisumbing A. Gendered impacts of the 2007-08 food price crisis: Evidence using panel data from rural Ethiopia 2012, International Food Policy Research Institute, Mimeo, Washington, DC.
31. Lastarria-Cornhiel, S., Behrman, J., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Quisumbing, A. (2011). Gender equity and land: Toward secure and effective access for rural women. Food and Agriculture Organization background paper, Rome, Italy: FAO.
32. Lee, S. (2008). How do women fare in education, employment and health? A gender analysis of the 2006 Vietnam household living standard survey. World Bank working paper 47433.
33. Lépine A., Strobl E. The effect of women's bargaining power on child nutrition in rural Senegal. World Development 2013, 45(5):17-30.
34. Lundberg, S., & Pollack, R. (1991). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. University of Washington working paper.
35. Manser M., Brown M. Marriage and household decision theory-A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review 1980, 21:21-34.
36. Markussen T., Tarp F., Van Den Broeck K. The forgotten property rights: Evidence on land use rights in Vietnam. World Development 2011, 39(5):839-850.
37. Mason K. Wives' economic decision-making power in the family: Five Asian countries. The changing family in comparative perspective: Asia and the United States 1998, 105-133. East-West Center, Honolulu. K. Mason (Ed.).
38. McCaig, B. (2009). The reliability of matches in the 2002-2004 Vietnam household living standards survey panel. Australian National University, Centre for Economic Policy Research discussion paper no. 622.
39. McElroy M. The empirical content of Nash-bargained household behavior. Journal of Human Resources 1990, 25(4):559-583.
40. McElroy M., Horney M. Nash-bargained decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review 1981, 22:333-349.
41. Panda P., Agarwal B. Marital violence, human development and women's property status in India. World Development 2005, 33(5):823-850.
42. Pande R., Udry C. Institutions and development: A view from below 2005, Yale University, Mimeo.
43. Peterman A. Widowhood and asset inheritance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Empirical evidence from 15 countries. Development Policy Review 2012, 30(5):543-571.
44. Pitt M., Khandker S., Cartwright J. Empowering women with micro finance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Development and Cultural Change 2006, 54(4):791-831.
45. Quisumbing A., Maluccio J. Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2003, 65(3):283-327.
46. Ravallion M., van de Walle D. Land in transition: Reform and poverty in rural Vietnam 2008, Palgrave MacMillan & World Bank, New York & Washington, DC.
47. Razavi S. Introduction: Agrarian change, gender and land rights. Journal of Agrarian Change 2003, 3(1-2):2-32.
48. Rodgers, Y., & Menon, N. (2010). Gender differences in socioeconomic status and health: Evidence from the 2008 Vietnam household living standard survey. World Bank working paper.
49. Sepehri A., Sarma S., Simpson W. Does non-profit health insurance reduce financial burden? Evidence from the Vietnam living standards survey panel. Health Economics 2006, 15:603-616.
50. Swaminathan, H., Lahoti, R., & Suchitra, J. Y. (2012). Women's property, mobility, and decision-making: Evidence from rural Karnataka, India. International Food Policy Research Institute discussion paper no. 01188, Washington, DC: IFPRI.
51. Thomas D. Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources 1990, 25(4):635-664.
52. Thomas D. Incomes, expenditures, and health outcomes: Evidence on intrahousehold resource allocation. Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Models, methods and policy 1997, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London. L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott, H. Alderman (Eds.).
53. Wagstaff, A. (2005). The economic consequences of health shocks. World Bank policy research working paper no. 3644. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
54. Wagstaff, A., & Pradhan, M. (2005). Health insurance impacts on health and nonmedical consumption in a developing country. World Bank policy research working paper no. 3563. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.