Balancing reduction and refinement

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 41, Issue PILAS 2-3, 2013, Pages

  Fenwick, Nicole ^a   Griffin, Gilly ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TESTING REDUCTION; ANIMAL TESTING REFINEMENT; ANIMAL TESTING REPLACEMENT; DISTRESS SYNDROME; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL WELFARE; EXPERIMENTAL DOG; NONHUMAN; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; TELEMETRY;

EID: 84883660085     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119291304100311     Document Type: Short Survey

References (22)

1. Russell, W.M.S. & Burch, R.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238pp. London, UK: Methuen.
2. Olsson, I.A.S., Franco, N.H., Weary, D.M. & Sandøe, P. (2012). The 3Rs principlemind the ethical gap. ALTEX Proceedings 1/12, 333-336.
3. Hansen, A.K., Sandøe, P., Svendsen, O., Forsman, B. & Thomsen, P. (1999). The need to refine the notion of reduction. In Humane Endpoint in Animal Experiments for Biomedical Research, pp. 139-144. London, UK: Laboratory Animals Ltd. Available at: http://www.lal.org.uk/publications/this-is-a-test- subject/humane-endpoints/(Accessed 15.05.13).
4. De Boo, M.J., Rennie, A.E., Buchanan-Smith, H.M. & Hendriksen, C.F.M. (2005). The interplay between replacement, reduction and refinement: Considerations where the Three Rs interact. Animal Welfare 14, 327-332.
5. Olsson, I.A.S., Robinson, P. & Sandøe, P. (2010). Ethics of animal research. In Handbook of Laboratory Science, Vol. 1, Third Edition: Essential Principles and Practices (ed. J. Hau & S.J. Schapiro), pp. 21-38. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
6. HMSO (1986). Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. 1986 Chapter 14: An Act to make new provision for the protection of animals used for experimental or other scientific purposes [20th May 1986]. London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/14 (Accessed 16.07.13).
7. Rose, M., Everitt J., Hedrich, H., Schofield, J., Dennis, M., Scott, E. & Griffin, G. (2013). ICLAS Working Group on Harmonisation: International guidance concerning the production care and use of genetically-altered animals. Laboratory Animals 47, 146-152.
8. USDA (2011). Policy #14: Major Survival Surgery Dealers Selling Surgically-Altered Animals to Research. Animal Care Resources Guide. Washington, DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture. Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal-welfare/policy.php?policy=14 (Accessed 06.06.13).
9. Schuppli, C.A. & Fraser, D. (2005). The interpretation and application of the Three Rs by animal ethics committee members. ATLA 33, 487-500.
10. Balls, M., Goldberg, A.M., Fentem, J.H., Broadhead, C.L., Burch, R.L., Festing, M.F.W. & van Zutphen, B.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: The way forward. ECVAM Workshop Report 11. ATLA 23, 838-866.
11. CCAC (2013). Three Rs Microsite. Montreal, Canada: Canadian Council on Animal Care Available at: http://3rs.ccac.ca/en/(Accessed 15.05.13).
12. NC3Rs (2013). What are the 3Rs? London, UK: National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research. Available at: http://www. nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=7 (Accessed 15.05.13).
13. Carbone, L. (2011). Pain in laboratory animals: The ethical and regulatory imperatives. PLoS ONE 6, (9):e21578 [doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0021578].
14. Baumans, V. & Van Loo, P.L.P. (2013). How to improve housing conditions of laboratory animals: The possibilities of environmental refinement. The Veterinary Journal 195, 24-32.
15. Jennings, M., Batchelor, G.R., Brain, P.F., Dick, A., Elliott, H., Francis, R.J., Hubrecht, R.C., Hurst, J.L., Morton, D.B., Peters, A.G., Raymond, R., Sales, G.D., Sherwin, C.M. & West, C. (1998). Refining rodent husbandry: The mouse. Report of the Rodent Refinement Working Party. Laboratory Animals 32, 233-259.
16. Fentner van Vlissingen, J.M. (1999). The re-use of animals for research - a humane endpoint? In Humane Endpoints in Animal Experiments for Biomedical Research, pp. 145-147. London, UK: Laboratory Animals Ltd. Available at: http://www.lal.org.uk/publications/this-is-a-test-subject/humane-endpoints/ (Accessed 15.05.13).
17. Beaulieu, M., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Le Maho, Y. & Ancel, A. (2010). Is abdominal implantation of devices a good alternative to external attachment? A comparative study in Adélie penguins. Journal of Ornithology 151, 579-586.
18. Cattet, M., Boulanger, J., Stenhouse, G., Powell, R.A. & Reynolds-Hogland, M.J. (2008). An evaluation of long-term capture effects in ursids: Implications for wildlife welfare and research. Journal of Mammalogy 89, 973-990.
19. Léchenne, M.S., Arnemo, J.M., Bröjer, C., Andrén, H. & Ågren, E.O. (2012). Mortalities due to constipation and dystocia caused by intraperitoneal radio-transmitters in Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx). European Journal of Wildlife Research 58, 503-506.
20. Anon. (2010). Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union L276, 20.10.2010, 33-79.
21. Honess, P. & Wolfensohn, S. (2010). The extended welfare assessment grid: A matrix for the assessment of welfare and cumulative suffering in experimental animals. ATLA 38, 205-212.
22. Weary, D.M. (2012). A good life for laboratory animals - how far must refinement go? ALTEX Proceedings 1/12, 11-13.