Hybrid modelling approach for effective simulation of reactive pollutants like Ozone

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 80, Issue , 2013, Pages 408-414

  Sharma, Sumit ^a,b   Sharma, Prateek ^c   Khare, Mukesh ^b  

^a THE ENERGY AND RESOURCES INSTITUTE   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^c TERI UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

CMAQ; Extreme ozone concentrations; Hybrid modelling; Statistical distribution models

Indexed keywords

CMAQ; COMMUNITY MULTI-SCALE AIR QUALITY MODELS; DETERMINISTIC COMPONENT; DETERMINISTIC MODELING; HYBRID MODELLING; OZONE CONCENTRATION; PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION MODEL;

AIR QUALITY; OZONE; POLLUTION;

FORECASTING;

OZONE;

AIR QUALITY; AMBIENT AIR; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); NUMERICAL MODEL; OZONE; POLLUTION CONTROL;

AIR POLLUTANT; AIR QUALITY; AMBIENT AIR; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION; COMMUNITY MULTI SCALE AIR QUALITY MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYBRID MODELLING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION MODEL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 84883652468     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.021     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ayyub B.M., McCuen R.H. Probability, Statistics, & Reliability for Engineers and Scientists 2011, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
2. Byun D., Schere K.L. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2006, 55:51-77.
3. Cai C., Hogrefe C., Katsafados P., Kallos G., Beauharnois M., Schwab J.J., Brune W.H., Zhou X., He Y., Demerjian K.L. Performance evaluation of air quality forecast modeling system for a summer and winter season - photochemical oxidants and their precursors. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42:8585-8599.
4. Chuang M.T., Zhang Y., Kang D. Application of WRF/Chem-MADRID for real-time air quality forecasting over the Southeastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45:6241-6250.
5. CPCB Air Quality Monitoring, Emission Inventory and Source Apportionment Study for Indian Cities 2011, Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi.
6. Eder B., Yu S. Aperformance evaluation of the 2004 release of Models-3 CMAQ. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40:4811-4824.
7. Gokhale S., Khare M. Ahybrid model for predicting carbon monoxide from vehicular exhausts in urban environments. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39:4025-4040.
8. Jakeman A.J., Simpson R.W., Taylor J.A. Modelling distributions of air pollutant concentrations-III: hybrid modelling deterministic-statistical distributions. Atmos. Environ. 1988, 22(1):163-174.
9. Khare M., Sharma P. Modelling the Vehicular Exhausts Emission 2002, WIT Press, UK.
10. Mage D.T., Ott W.R. An evaluation of the method of fractiles, moments and maximum likelihood for estimating parameters when sampling air quality data from a stationary lognormal distribution. Atmos. Environ. 1984, 18:163-171.
11. Mathur R., Yu S., Kang D., Schere K.L. Assessment of the wintertime performance of developmental particulated matter forecasts with the Eta-Community Multiscale Air Quality modelling system. J.Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113(D02303). 10.1029/2007JD008589.
12. Phillips S.B., Finkelstein P.L. Comparison of spatial patterns of pollutant distribution with CMAQ predictions. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40:4999-5009.
13. Sharma P., Chandra A., Kaushik S.C., Sharma P., Jain S. Predicting violations of national ambient air quality standards using extreme value theory for Delhi city. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2012, 3:170-179.
14. Sharma P., Sharma P., Jain S., Kumar P. An integrated statistical approach for evaluating the exceedence of criteria pollutants in the ambient air of megacity Delhi. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 70:7-17.
15. Shi C., Fernando H.J., Hyde P. CMAQ predictions of tropospheric ozone in the U.S. southwest: influence of lateral boundary and synoptic conditions. Sci. Total. Environ. 2012, 416:374-384.
16. Sokhi R.S., San José R., Kitwiroon N., Fragkou E., Pérez J.L., Middleton D.R. Prediction of ozone levels in London using the MM5-CMAQ modelling system. J.Environ. Model. Softw. 2006, 21(4):566-576.
17. Taylor J.A., Simpson R.W., Jakeman A.J. A hybrid model for predicting the distribution of pollutants dispersed from line sources. Sci. Total Environ. 1985, 46:191-213.
18. Taylor J.A., Jakeman A.J., Simpson R.W. Modeling distributions of air pollutant concentrations e I: identification of statistical models. Atmos. Environ. 1986, 20(9):1781-1789.
19. Willmott C.J. On the validation of models. Phys. Geogr. 1981, 2:184-194.
20. Willmott C.J. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1982, 63:1309-1313.
21. Willmott C.J., Wicks D.E. An empirical method for the spatial interpolation of monthly precipitation within California. Phys. Geogr. 1980, 1:59-73.
22. Willmott C.J., Ackleson S.G., Davis R.E., Feddema J.J., Klink K.M., Legates D.R., O'Donnell J., Rowe C.M. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. J.Geophys. Res. 1985, 90:8995-9005.
23. Yu Shaocai, Kasibhatla P.S., Wright D.L., Schwartz S.E., McGraw R., Deng A. Moment-based simulation of the influence of microphysical properties of sulfate aerosols in the Eastern United States: model description, evaluation and regional analysis. J.Geophys. Res. 2003, 108(D12):4353. 10.1029/2002JD002890.
24. Yu Shaocai, Dennis R., Bhave P., Eder B. Primary and secondary organic aerosols over the United States: estimates on the basis of observed organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), and air quality modeled primary OC/EC ratios. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38:5257-5268.
25. Yu S., Eder B., Dennis R., Chu S.H., Schwartz S. New unbiased symmetric metrics for evaluation of air quality models. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 2006, 7:26-34.
26. Yu S., Mathur R., Kang D., Schere K., Eder B., Pleim J. Performance and diagnostic evaluations of a real-time ozone forecast by the Eta-CMAQ model suite during the 2002 New England Air Quality Study (NEAQS). JAir Waste Manag. Assoc. 2006, 56:1459-1471.
27. 3, its related precursors, and meteorological parameters during the 2004 ICARTT study. J.Geophys. Res. 2007, 112:D12S14.
28. Yu S., Mathur R., Schere K., Kang D., Pleim J.E., Young J., Tong D., Pouliot G., Mckeen S.A., Rao S.T. Evaluation of real-time PM2.5 forecasts and process analysis for PM2.5 formation over the United States using the Eta-CMAQ forecast model during the 2004 ICARTT study. J.Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113(D06204). 10.1029/2007JD009226.
29. 3 and related species during the 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS campaign. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2012, 3:149-162.