Evaluation of optimized digital fundus reflex photographs for lens opacities in the age-related eye disease study 2: AREDS2 report 7

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 54, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 5989-5994

  Domalpally, Amitha ^a   Danis, Ronald P ^a   Chew, Emily Y ^b   Clemons, Traci E ^c   Reed, Susan ^a   SanGiovanni, John Paul ^b   Ferris III, Frederick L ^b  

^a Fundus Photograph Reading Center   (United States)

^b NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c EMMES CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

AREDS2; Cataract; Lens opacity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATARACT; DIGITAL FUNDUS REFLEX PHOTOGRAPHY; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION;

AREDS2; CATARACT; LENS OPACITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATARACT; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FUNDUS OCULI; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MACULAR DEGENERATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84883647936     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12301     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004; 82:844-851.
2. Congdon N, Vingerling JR, Klein BE, et al. Prevalence of cataract and pseudophakia/aphakia among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:487-494.
3. Robin AL, Thulasiraj RD. Cataract blindness. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:1452-1455.
4. West SK, Taylor HR. The detection and grading of cataract: an epidemiologic perspective. Surv Ophthalmol. 1986;31:175-184.
5. Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL, Magli YL, Neider MW. Assessment of cataracts from photographs in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:1428-1433.
6. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. The agerelated eye disease study (AREDS) system for classifying cataracts from photographs: AREDS report No. 4. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:167-175.
7. Wong WL, Li X, Li J, et al. Cataract conversion assessment using lens opacity classification system III and Wisconsin cataract grading system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54: 280-287.
8. Chylack LTJ, Wolfe JK, Friend J, et al. Validation of methods for the assessment of cataract progression in the Roche European- American Anticataract Trial (REACT). Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1995;2:59-75.
9. Thylefors B, Chylack LT Jr, Konyama K, et al. A simplified cataract grading system. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2002;9:83-95.
10. Taylor HR, Lee JA, Wang F, Muñoz B. A comparison of two photographic systems for grading cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:529-532.
11. Chew EY, Kim J, Sperduto RD, et al. Evaluation of the agerelated eye disease study clinical lens grading system AREDS report No. 31. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:2112-2119.
12. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1439-1452.
13. Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Neider MW, et al. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3269-3282.
14. FDA. FDA Guidance for Industry-Standards for Clinical Trial Imaging Endpoints. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2011:1-26.
15. Chew E, SanGiovanni JP, Ferris FL, et al. Lutein/zeaxanthin for the treatment of age-related cataract: AREDS2 Randomized Trial Report No. 4. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:843-850.