Statistical sampling design impact on predictive quality of harmonization functions between soil monitoring networks

Geoderma

Volumn 213, Issue , 2014, Pages 133-143

  Louis, B P ^a   Saby, N P A ^a   Orton, T G ^a   Lacarce, E ^a   Boulonne, L ^a   Jolivet, C ^a   Ratie C ^a   Arrouays, D ^a  

^a Centre de recherche d'Orléans   (France)

Author keywords

Data harmonization; Latin Hypercube Sampling; Predictive performance; Random sampling; Soil quality monitoring networks

Indexed keywords

DATA HARMONIZATION; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE; RANDOM SAMPLING; SOIL QUALITY;

CALIBRATION; FORESTRY; SOILS;

SAMPLING;

CALIBRATION; CARBON; DATA SET; DESIGN; FOREST SOIL; MEASUREMENT METHOD; MONITORING; PH; POTASSIUM; SAMPLING; SOIL QUALITY; SOIL SURVEY; SOIL TYPE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA PROCESSING; FORESTRY; SAMPLING; SOIL; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

EID: 84883539555     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arrouays D., Jolivet C., Boulonne L., Bodineau G., Saby N., Grolleau E. Une initiative nouvelle en France: la mise en place d'un réseau multi-institutionnel de mesure de la qualité des sols (RMQS). Comptes Rendus Académie d'Agriculture de France 2002, 88(5):93-103.
2. Arrouays D., Marchant B.P., Saby N.P.A., Meersmans J., Orton T.G., Martin M.P., Bellamy P.H., Lark R.M., Kibblewhite M. Generic issues on broad scale soil monitoring schemes: a review. Pedosphere 2012, 22(4):456-469.
3. Baritz R., Eberhardt E. Database design and selection. Cranfield University, UK, for Scientific Support to Policy, European Commission 6th Framework Research Programme 2008.
4. Bellon-Maurel V., Fernandez-Ahumada E., Palagaos B., Roger J.M., McBratney A. Critical review of chemometric indicators commonly used for assessing the quality of the prediction of soil attributes by NIR spectroscopy. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2010, 29(9):1073-1081. (October 2010).
5. CEC Communication of 16 April 2002 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Towards a Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection [COM(2002) 179 Final] At:, (Last accessed: 16/07/2012). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2002:0179:FIN:EN:PDF.
6. CEC Proposal for Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council: Establishing a Framework for the Protection of Soil and Amending Directive 2004/35/EC. Brussels, 22/09/2006 2006, (30 pp.).
7. de Gruijter J.J., Brus D.J., Bierkens M.F.P., Knotters M. Sampling for Natural Resource Monitoring 2006, 332. Springer, Berlin.
8. Diggle P.J., Ribeiro P.J. Model Based Geostatistics 2007, Springer, New York.
9. Elith J., Leathwick J.R., Hastie T. A working guide to boosted regression trees. The Journal of Animal Ecology 2008, 77:802-813.
10. European Parliament & European Union Council Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 Establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE). Official Journal of the European Union 2007, (L108/101-114).
11. Gawlik B.M., Ulberthe F., Langenkamp H., Bidoglio G., Grasserbauer M. On the role of environmental reference materials in the development of horizontal standards for environmental protection. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 2004, 9:221-225.
12. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning, data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer Series in Statistics 2001, (746 pp.). Second edition.
13. Hiederer R., Michéli E., Durrant T. Evaluation of BioSoil Demonstration Project - Soil Data Analysis 2011, EUR 24729 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, (155 pp.).
14. Hocking R.R. The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression. Biometrics 1976, 32(1):1-49.
15. Jolivet C., Arrouays D., Boulonne L., Ratié C., Saby N. Le Réseau de Mesures de la Qualité des Sols de France (RMQS). Etat d'avancement et premiers résultats. Etude et Gestion des Sols 2006, 13:149-164.
16. Kibblewhite, M.G., Jones, R.J.A., Baritz, R., Huber, S., Arrouays, D., Micheli, E. & Stephens, M. 2008. ENVASSO final report part I: scientific and technical activities. ENVASSO Project (Contract 022713), in: (ed U. coordinated by Cranfield University, for Scientific Support to Policy, European Commission 6th Framework Research Programme.)
17. Kiers H.A.L., Smilde A.K. A comparison for various methods for multivariate regression with highly collinear variables. Statistical Methods and Applications 2007, 16:193-228.
18. Köhl M., Traub B., Päivinen Risto Harmonisation and standardisation in multi-national environmental statistics - mission impossible?. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 1999, 63:361-380. (2000).
19. Lacarce E., et al. Data management for monitoring forest soils in Europe for the Biosoil project. Soil Use and Management 2009, 25(1):57-65.
20. Lark R.M., Cullis B.R. Model-based analysis using REML for inference from systematically sampled data on soil. European Journal of Soil Science 2004, 55:799-813.
21. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analyses of output from computer code. Technometrics 1979, 21:239-245.
22. Minasny B., McBratney A.B.. A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Computers & Geosciences 2006, 32:1378-1388.
23. Minasny B., McBratney A.B.. Conditioned Latin hypercube sampling for calibrating soil sensor data to soil properties. Book Series: Progress in, Soil Science 2010, 111-119.
24. Morvan X., Richer de Forges A., Arrouays D., Le Bas C., Saby N., Jones R.J.A., et al. Une analyse des stratégies d'échantillonnage des réseaux de surveillance de la qualité des sols en Europe. Etude et Gestion des Sols 2007, 14(4):302-310. (In French with English abstract).
25. Morvan X., Saby N.P.A., Arrouays D., Le Bas C., Jones R.J.A., Verheijen F.G.A., et al. Soil monitoring in Europe: a review of existing systems and requirements for harmonisation. Science of the Total Environment 2008, 391:1-12.
26. Pinheiro J., Bates D., DebRoy S., Sarkar D., the R Development Core Team nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version 3.1-106 2012.
27. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, (URL http://www.R-project.org/).
28. Rawlins B.G., Scheib A.J., Lark R.M., Lister T.R. Sampling and analytical plus subsampling variance components for five soil indicators observed at regional scale. European Journal of Soil Science 2009, 60:740-747.
29. Ribeiro P.J., Diggle P.J. geoR: a package for geostatistical analysis. R-NEWS 2001, 1(2):15-18. (June).
30. Skøien J.O., Baume O.P., Pebesma E.J., Heuvelink G.B. Identifying and removing heterogeneities between monitoring networks. Environmetrics 2010, 21:66-84.
31. St.John R.C., Draper N.R. D-optimality for regression designs: a review. Technometrics 1975, 17:15-23.
32. Van Beek C.L., Tóth T., Hagyó A., Tóth G., Recatalá Boix L., Añó Vidal C., et al. The need for harmonizing methodologies for assessing soil threats in Europe. Soil Use and Management 2010, 26:299-309.