First steps: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of the Group Family Nurse Partnership (gFNP) program compared to routine care in improving outcomes for high-risk mothers and their children and preventing abuse

Trials

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Barnes, Jacqueline ^a   Aistrop, Dipti ^b   Allen, Elizabeth ^c   Barlow, Jane ^d   Elbourne, Diana ^c   Macdonald, Geraldine ^e   Melhuish, Edward ^a   Petrou, Stavros ^d   Pink, Joshua ^d   Snowdon, Claire ^c   Spiby, Helen ^f   Stuart, Jane ^a   Sturgess, Joanna ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^e QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Child abuse; Early intervention; Nurse; Young parents

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD ABUSE; CHILD NEGLECT; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GESTATIONAL AGE; GROUP FAMILY NURSE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVE BIRTH; MATERNAL AGE; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARENTAL STRESS; PATIENT CARE; PUERPERAL DEPRESSION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; CHILD ABUSE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ENGLAND; FAMILY NURSING; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; MOTHER-CHILD RELATIONS; MOTHERS; PARENTING; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREGNANCY; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883523679     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-285     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Department for Education (DfE) Statistical First Release SFR27/2010 2012, London: Department for Education, Department for Education (DfE).
2. Office H. Crime in England and Wales 2001/2002: Supplementary Volume 2003, London: Home Office.
3. Dias MS, Smith K, de Guehery K, Mazur P, Li V, Shaffer ML. Preventing abusive head trauma among infants and young children: a hospital-based, parent education program. Pediatrics 2005, 115:470-477.
4. Sidebotham PD and the ALSPAC study team Patterns of child abuse in early childhood, a cohort study of the 'Children of the Nineties'. Child Abuse Rev 2000, 9:311-320. Sidebotham PD and the ALSPAC study team.
5. Allen G. Early Intervention: the Next Steps 2011, London: Cabinet Office.
6. Gunnar MR, Donzella B. Social regulation of the cortisol levels in early human development. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2002, 27:199-220. 10.1016/S0306-4530(01)00045-2, 11750779.
7. Schore AN. Attachment and the regulation of the right brain. Attach Hum Dev 2000, 2:23-47. 10.1080/146167300361309, 11707891.
8. Mikton C, Butchart A. Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews. Bull WHO 2009, 87(5):325-404.
9. Avellar S, Paulsell D, Sama-Miller E, Del Grosso P. Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review: Executing Summary 2012, Washington DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services.
10. Olds DL, et al. Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect. Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JAMA 1997, 278:637-643. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080047038, 9272895.
11. Olds D, Kitzman H, Cole R, Robinson J. Theoretical foundations of a program of home visitation for pregnant women and parents of young children. J Com Psych 1997, 25:9-25.
12. Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design 1979, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Rev 1977, 84:191-215.
14. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss. Volume 1. Attachment 1969, New York: Basic Books.
15. Olds DL. The Nurse-Family Partnership: an evidence-based preventive intervention. Inf Mental Hlth J 2006, 27:5-25.
16. Kitzman H, et al. Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997, 278:644-652. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080054039, 9272896.
17. Eckenrode J, et al. Long-term effects of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on the life course of youths. Nineteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010, 164:9-15. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.240, 20048236.
18. Olds DL, et al. Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses: age-four follow-up of a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2004, 114:1560-1568. 10.1542/peds.2004-0961, 15574615.
19. Aos S, Lieb R, Mayfield J, Miller M, Pennucci A. Benefits and Costs of Prevention and Early Intervention Programs for Youth 2004, Olympia WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
20. Olds DL, Henderson CR, Chamberlin R, Tatelbaum R. Preventing child abuse and neglect: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics 1986, 78:65-78.
21. Barnes J, Ball M, Meadows P, McLeish J, Belsky J, FNP Implementation Research Team Nurse-Family Partnership: First Year Pilot Sites Implementation in England. Pregnancy and the Post-partum Period 2008, London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, FNP Implementation Research Team.
22. Barnes J, Ball M, Meadows P, Belsky J, FNP Implementation Research Team Nurse-Family Partnership Program: Second Year Pilot Sites Implementation in England. The Infancy Period. Research report DCSF-RR166 2009, London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, FNP Implementation Research Team.
23. Barnes J, Ball M, Meadows P, Howden B, Jackson A, Henderson J, Niven L. The Family-Nurse Partnership Program in England: Wave 1 Implementation in Toddlerhood and a Comparison between Waves 1 and 2a of Implementation in Pregnancy and Infancy 2011, London: Department of Health.
24. Department of Health (DH) More Help for Disadvantaged Families in press. [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/mediacentre/pressreleases/DH_121040], Department of Health (DH).
25. Hall D, Hall S. The 'Family-Nurse Partnership': Developing an Instrument for Identification, Assessment and Recruitment of Clients. Research Report DCSF-RW022 2007, London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
26. Barnes J. Evaluation of a Group Support Program Based on the Nurse Family Partnership Model 2011, Melbourne, Australia, Paper presented at: RE Ross Trust and Murdoch Children's Research Institute conference Empowering Parents, Empowering Communities. Using evidence in family-centerd practice, [http://www.rch.org.au/uploadedfiles/main/content/ccch/03_barnes_melbourne_april_15.pdf].
27. Rising S. Centering pregnancy: an interdisciplinary model of empowerment. J Nurse Midwifery 1998, 43:46-54. 10.1016/S0091-2182(97)00117-1, 9489291.
28. Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, et al. Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics. Obstet Gynaecol 2003, 102:1052-1057.
29. Ickovics J, Kershaw T, Westdahl C, Magriples U, Reynolds H, Rising S. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynaecol 2007, 110:330-339.
30. Robertson B, Aycock DM, Darnell LA. Comparison of centering pregnancy to traditional care in Hispanic mothers. Matern Child Health J 2009, 13:407-414. 10.1007/s10995-008-0353-1, 18465216.
31. Grady MA, Bloom KC. Pregnancy outcomes of adolescents enrolled in a centering pregnancy program. J Midwifery and Women's Health 2004, 49:412-420. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.05.009, 24015821.
32. Williams KJ, Zolotor A, Kaufmann L. Does group prenatal care improve pregnancy outcomes?. JFP 2009, 58:384a-c.
33. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Antenatal Care. Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman. NICE Clinical Guideline 62 2008, London: NICE, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
34. Henderson J, Barnes J. Interim Report on Recruitment and the Pregnancy Phase of the Formative Evaluation of the Group-based Antenatal Care Project, Report to the Department of Health 2010, London: Birkbeck University of London.
35. Henderson J, Barnes J. Interim Report on Early Infancy Phase of the Formative Evaluation of the Group-based Antenatal Care Project, Report to the Department of Health 2010, London: Birkbeck, University of London.
36. Barnes J, Henderson J. Summary of the Formative Evaluation of the First Phase of the Group-based Family Nurse Partnership program 2012, London: Department of Health.
37. Shribman S, Billingham K. Healthy Child Program. Pregnancy and the First Five Years 2009, London: Department of Health.
38. Hall D, Elliman D. Health for All Children 2006, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4.
39. Bavolek SJ, Keene RG. Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory AAPI-2: Administration and Development Handbook 2001, Park City, UT: Family Development Resources.
40. Crittenden PM. CARE-Index Infants and Toddlers: Coding Manual 2001, Miami, FL: Family Relations Institute.
41. Crittenden PM. Abusing, neglecting, problematic, and adequate dyads: differentiating by patterns of interaction. Merrill-Palmer Q 1981, 27:1-18.
42. Cramer B, Robert-Tissot C, Stern DN, et al. Outcome evaluation in brief mother-infant psychotherapy: a preliminary report. Inf Mental Hlth J 1990, 11:278-300.
43. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2.
44. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. B J Psych 1987, 150:782-786.
45. Abidin R. Parenting Stress Index (3rd Edition): Professional Manual 1995, Lutz, FL: PAR, Inc.
46. Lacharite C, Ethier LS, Couture G. Sensitivity and specificity of the Parenting Stress Index in situations of child maltreatment. Canad J Behav Sci 1999, 31:217-220.
47. Mash EJ, Johnston C, Kovitz K. A comparison of the mother-child interactions of physically abused and non-abused children during play and task situations. J Clin Child Psychol 1983, 12:337-346.
48. Nair P, Schuler ME, Black MM, Kettinger L, Harrington D. Cumulative environmental risk in substance abusing women: early intervention, parenting stress, child abuse potential, and child development. Child Abuse Negl 2003, 27:997-1017. 10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00169-8, 14550328.
49. Johnston C, Mash EJ. A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. J Clin Child Psychol 1989, 18:167-175.
50. Gilmore L, Cuskelly M. Factor structure of the parenting sense of competence scale using a normative sample. Child: Care Hlth & Dev 2008, 35:48-55.
51. Brooks R. EQ-5D, the current state of play. Health Pol 1996, 37:53-72.
52. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQoL health states. Med Care 1997, 35:1095-1108. 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002, 9366889.
53. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 1991, 32:705-714. 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B, 2035047.
54. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013, London: NICE, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
55. Barber JA, Thompson SG. Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med 2000, 23:3219-3236.
56. Stinnett AA, Mullahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making 1998, 18(2 Suppl):S68-S80.
57. Robson C. Real World Research 2011, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 3.
58. Lopez KA, Willis DG. Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qual Health Res 2004, 14:726-735. 10.1177/1049732304263638, 15107174.
59. Damocles Study Group A proposed charter for clinical trial data monitoring committees: helping them to do their job well. Lancet 2005, 365:711-722. Damocles Study Group.