Measurement of fetal fat in utero in normal and diabetic pregnancies using magnetic resonance imaging

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 335-340

  Anblagan, D ^a   Deshpande, R ^b   Jones, N W ^b   Costigan, C ^a   Bugg, G ^b   Raine Fenning, N ^a   Gowland, P A ^a   Mansell, P ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

body composition; diabetes; fat; fetus; magnetic resonance imaging; pregnancy

Indexed keywords

FAT;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS WEIGHT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES;

BODY COMPOSITION; DIABETES; FAT; FETUS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREGNANCY;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; BODY COMPOSITION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FETAL WEIGHT; FETUS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN DIABETICS; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, THIRD; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84883511886     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.12382     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Osler M., Body fat of newborn infants of diabetic mothers. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1960; 34: 277-286.
2. Persson M, Pasupathy D, Hanson U, Norman M,. Birth size distribution in 3,705 infants born to mothers with type 1 diabetes: a population-based study. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1145-1149.
3. Evers IM, de Valk HW, Visser GH,. Risk of complications of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: nationwide prospective study in the Netherlands. BMJ 2004; 328: 915-919.
4. Silverman BL, Metzger BE, Cho NH, Loeb CA,. Impaired glucose tolerance in adolescent offspring of diabetic mothers. Relationship to fetal hyperinsulinism. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 611-617.
5. Simeoni U, Barker DJ,. Offspring of diabetic pregnancy: long-term outcomes. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 14: 119-124.
6. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland PA, Hykin J, Harvey PR, Freeman A, Adams V, Worthington BS, Mansfield P,. Fetal weight estimation by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1994; 343: 644-645.
7. Wang Z, Heshka S, Wang J, Wielopolski L, Heymsfield SB,. Magnitude and variation of fat-free mass density: a cellular-level body composition modeling study. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2003; 284: E267-E273.
8. Fomon SJ, Haschke F, Ziegler EE, Nelson SE,. Body composition of reference children from birth to age 10 years. Am J Clin Nutr 1982; 35: 1169-1175.
9. McGraw KO, Wong SP,. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1996; 1: 30-46.
10. Bjørstad AR, Irgens-Hansen K, Daltveit AK, Irgens LM,. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 664-669.
11. Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, Peterson PQ,. Macrosomia-maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 158-161.
12. Schwartz R, Teramo KA,. What is the significance of macrosomia? Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 1201-1205.
13. Gupta M, Hockley C, Quigley MA, Yeh P, Impey L,. Antenatal and intrapartum prediction of shoulder dystocia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 151: 134-139.
14. Bernstein I., Fetal body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2005; 8: 613-617.
15. Coomarasamy A, Connock M, Thornton J, Khan KS,. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review. BJOG 2005; 112: 1461-1466.
16. Chauhan SP, West DJ, Scardo JA, Boyd JM, Joiner J, Hendrix NW,. Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 639-642.
17. Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Ben-Haroush A,. Sonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia: the consequences of false diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 225-230.
18. Siemer J, Peter W, Zollver H, Hart N, Müller A, Meurer B, Goecke T, Schild RL,. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods? Ultraschall Med 2008; 29: 377-382.
19. Bennini JR, Marussi EF, Barini R, Faro C, Peralta CF,. Birth-weight prediction by two- and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 426-433.
20. Bernstein IM, Catalano PM,. Influence of fetal fat on the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in diabetic mothers. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 561-563.
21. Higgins MF, Russell NM, Mulcahy CH, Coffey M, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM,. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness in diabetic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 140: 43-47.
22. Farah N, Stuart B, Donnelly V, Rafferty G, Turner M,. What is the value of ultrasound soft tissue measurements in the prediction of abnormal growth? J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 29: 457-463.
23. Berger-Kulemann V, Brugger PC, Reisegger M, Klein K, Hachemian N, Koelblinger C, Weber M, Prayer D,. Quantification of the subcutaneous fat layer with MRI in fetuses of healthy mothers with no underlying metabolic disease vs. fetuses of diabetic and obese mothers. J Perinat Med 2011; 40: 179-184.
24. Yki-Järvinen H., Liver fat in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Dig Dis 2010; 28: 203-209.