A Novel Analysis Algorithm for Potential Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Computed Tomography Perfusion

Academic Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1301-1305

  Liew, Gary ^a   Ali, Nabeel ^a,b   Do, Synho ^a   Petranovic, Milena ^a   Cury, Ricardo ^c   Brady, Thomas ^a   Hoffmann, Udo ^a   Ghoshhajra, Brian ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c BAPTIST CARDIAC AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Cardiac imaging; Computed tomography; Image analysis; Myocardial perfusion

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REST; STRESS;

ALGORITHM; CARDIAC IMAGING; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION;

ALGORITHMS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84883499220     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Heron M., Hoyert D.L., Murphy S.L., et al. Deaths: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009, 57:1-134.
2. Blankstein R., Shturman L.D., Rogers I.S., et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:1072-1084.
3. George R.T., Arbab-Zadeh A., Miller J.M., et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:174-182.
4. Cerqueira M.D., Weissman N.J., Dilsizian V., et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002, 105:539-542.
5. Slomka P.J., Nishina H., Berman D.S., et al. Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: a new measure of ischemia. JNucl Med 2004, 45:183-191.
6. Xu Y., Hayes S., Ali I., et al. Automatic and visual reproducibility of perfusion and function measures for myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiology 2010, 17:1050-1057.
7. Delzescaux T., Frouin F., de Cesare A., et al. Using an adaptive semiautomated self-evaluated registration technique to analyze MRI data for myocardial perfusion assessment. J Magnetic Reson Imaging 2003, 18:681-690.
8. Achenbach S. Stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion: steps, questions, and layers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:1085-1087.
9. Hoffman J.I. Transmural myocardial perfusion. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1987, 29:429-464.
10. Kim R.J., Wu E., Rafael A., et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. New Engl J Med 2000, 343:1445-1453.