Mitigation potential of carbon dioxide emissions in the Chinese textile industry

Applied Energy

Volumn 113, Issue , 2014, Pages 781-787

  Lin, Boqiang ^a,b   Moubarak, Mohamed ^b  

^a MINJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Carbon intensity; China; Textile industry

Indexed keywords

CARBON; GLOBAL WARMING; TEXTILE INDUSTRY;

BUSINESS-AS-USUAL; CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CARBON INTENSITY; CHINA; EQUILIBRIUM EQUATION; LABOR PRODUCTIVITY; POLICY SUGGESTIONS; REDUCTION POTENTIAL;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; FORECASTING METHOD; INDUSTRIAL EMISSION; TEXTILE INDUSTRY;

CHINA;

EID: 84883495366     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. EIA, U.S. Energy Information Administration. [accessed 15.03.13]. http://www.ei.
2. China energy statistical yearbook, N.B.o.S., People's Republic of China, Department of Energy Statistics. China Statistical Press; 2012.
3. 2) emissions from energy use in China's iron and steel industry. J Iron Steel Res Int 2011, 18(6):31-36.
4. 2 emissions in China's cement industry: a perspective from LMDI decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 2012, 50:821-832.
5. Wang Y., Liang S. Carbon dioxide mitigation target of China in 2020 and key economic sectors. Energy Policy 2013, 58:90-96.
6. 2 emissions in Greece for 1990-2002: a decomposition analysis and comparison of results using the Arithmetic Mean Divisia Index and Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index techniques. Energy 2008, 33(3):492-499.
7. Guo X.-D., et al. Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA. Energy Policy 2011, 39(5):2352-2360.
8. 2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Appl Energy 2012, 98:198-208.
9. 2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry. J Cleaner Prod 2010, 18(15):1509-1518.
10. Worrell E., Price L., Martin N. Energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction opportunities in the US iron and steel sector. Energy 2001, 26(5):513-536.
11. 2 emissions reduction of China's cement industry. Energy Policy 2012, 45:739-751.
12. Ari I., Aydinalp Koksal M. Carbon dioxide emission from the Turkish electricity sector and its mitigation options. Energy Policy 2011, 39(10):6120-6135.
13. 2 emission mitigation potential in the Turkish electricity sector: 2006-2030. Energy 2013, 49:395-403.
14. 2 emission from China's energy sector and strategy for its control. Energy 2010, 35(11):4494-4498.
15. Li L., et al. Energy demand and carbon emissions under different development scenarios for Shanghai, China. Energy Policy 2010, 38(9):4797-4807.
16. 2 emissions and a low-carbon scenario for the Brazilian industrial sector. Energy Policy 2010, 38(4):1946-1961.
17. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 1979, 74(366):427-431.
18. Phillips P.C.B., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrica 1988, 75(2):335-346.
19. Kwiatkowski D., et al. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. J Econom 1992, 54(1-3):159-178.
20. Sabuhoro J.B., Larue B. The market efficiency hypothesis: the case of coffee and cocoa futures. Agr Econ 1997, 16(3):171-184.
21. Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 1987, 55(2):251-276.
22. Johansen S. Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
23. Johansen S., Juselius K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 1990, 52(2):169-210.
24. Pesaran M., Pesaran B. Working with microfit 4.0: interactive econometric analysis 1997, Oxford University Press.
25. 2-emissions in energy-intensive industries in Scandinavia. Energy Econ 2007, 29(4):665-692.
26. Lin BQ. Electricity demand in the People's Republic of China: investment requirement and environmental impact. Asian Development Bank; 2003. Working Paper (No. 37).
27. Greening L.A., Davis W.B., Schipper L. Decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity for the manufacturing sector: comparison of declining trends from 10 OECD countries for the period 1971-1991. Energy Econ 1998, 20(1):43-65.
28. Nag B., Parikh J. Indicators of carbon emission intensity from commercial energy use in India. Energy Econ 2000, 22(4):441-461.
29. Greening L.A., Ting M., Davis W.B. Decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity for freight: trends from 10 OECD countries for the period 1971-1993. Energy Econ 1999, 21(4):331-361.
30. 2 intensity of power generation and consumption: a global perspective. Energy Policy 2011, 39(2):613-627.
31. 2 mitigation potential and costs in China's electricity sector. Energy Policy 2010, 38(8):4209-4213.
32. China Statistical Yearbook, N.B.o.S., People's Republic of China, China Statistics Press, Beijing; 1990-2011.
33. China statistical yearbook on science and technology, N.B.o.S., People's Republic of China, China Statistics Press, Beijing; 1990-2011.
34. CEIC China Database; 2013. . http://ceicdata.securities.com/cdmWeb/.
35. IPCC, Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Industrial processes and product use 3; 2006. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/.
36. Lin B., Zhang L., Wu Y. Evaluation of electricity saving potential in China's chemical industry based on cointegration. Energy Policy 2012, 44:320-330.
37. Hondroyiannis G. Estimating residential demand for electricity in Greece. Energy Econ 2004, 26(3):319-334.
38. Grover V., et al. The influence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: the IS executive's perspective. Inf Manage 1998, 34(3):141-159.
39. Lin B., Wu Y., Zhang L. Electricity saving potential of the power generation industry in China. Energy 2012, 40(1):307-316.
40. Wang K., Wang C., Chen J. Analysis of the economic impact of different Chinese climate policy options based on a CGE model incorporating endogenous technological change. Energy Policy 2009, 37(8):2930-2940.