Resource contention detection and management for consolidated workloads

Proceedings of the 2013 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, IM 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 294-302

  Mukherjee, J ^a   Krishnamurthy, D ^a   Rolia, J ^b   Hyser, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PERFORMANCE; HARDWARE PLATFORM; MEMORY HIERARCHY; MEMORY SUBSYSTEMS; MULTI-LEVEL CACHING; PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION; RESOURCE CONTENTION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MEMORY ARCHITECTURE; PROBES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

NETWORK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84883472853     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Lydia Y. Chen, Danilo Ansaloni, Evgenia Smirni, Akira Yokokawa, and Walter Binder. Achieving application-centric performance targets via consolidation on multicores: myth or reality? In Proceedings of the 21st international symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing, HPDC '12, pages 37-48, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
2. Huang Xianglong et al. The garbage collection advantage: improving program locality. In Proc. of OOPSLA '04, pages 69-80. ACM, 2004.
3. Lingjia Tang et al. The impact of memory subsystem resource sharing on datacenter applications. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News, 39(3):283-294, June 2011.
4. Rahul Singh et al. Autonomic mix-Aware provisioning for non-stationary data center workloads. In Proc. of ICAC'10, pages 21-30. ACM, 2010.
5. Ramesh Illikkal et al. Pirate: Qos and performance management in cmp architectures. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev., 37(4):3-10, March 2010.
6. Sergey Blagodurov et al. Contention-Aware scheduling on multicore systems. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 28(4):8:1-8:45, December 2010.
7. Stephen M. Blackburn et al. The dacapo benchmarks: java benchmarking development and analysis. SIGPLAN Not., 41(10):169-190, October 2006.
8. Todd Deshane et al. Quantitative comparison of xen and KVM. In Xen summit, Berkeley, CA, USA, June 2008. USENIX association.
9. Waheed Iqbal et al. Adaptive resource provisioning for read intensive multi-tier applications in the cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 27(6):871-879, 2011.
10. George Kousiouris, Tommaso Cucinotta, and Theodora Varvarigou. The effects of scheduling, workload type and consolidation scenarios on virtual machine performance and their prediction through optimized artificial neural networks. J. Syst. Softw., 84(8):1270-1291, August 2011.
11. David Mosberger and Tai Jin. httperf a tool for measuring web server performance. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev., 26(3):31-37, December 1998.
12. Bryan Veal and Annie Foong. Performance scalability of a multicore web server. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architecture for networking and communications systems, ANCS '07, pages 57-66, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
13. ZhikuiWang, Yuan Chen, D. Gmach, S. Singhal, B.J.Watson,W. Rivera, Xiaoyun Zhu, and C.D. Hyser. Appraise: application-level performance management in virtualized server environments. Network and Service Management, IEEE Transactions on, 6(4):240-254, december 2009.
14. Jing Xu and José Fortes. A multi-objective approach to virtual machine management in datacenters. In Proc. of ICAC'11, pages 225-234. ACM, 2011.
15. Jing Xu and José Fortes. A multi-objective approach to virtual machine management in datacenters. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on Autonomic computing, ICAC '11, pages 225-234, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.