Endoscopic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic disease

Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 559-565

  Brugge, William R ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

chronic pancreatitis; endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography; endoscopic ultrasound; fine needle aspiration; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELASTOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY; HUMAN; METAL STENT; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS DIVISUM; PANCREAS PSEUDOCYST; PANCREAS SECRETION; PANCREAS STONE; PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; PANCREATITIS; PLASTIC STENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VATER PAPILLA STENOSIS;

ACUTE DISEASE; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATITIS; PANCREATITIS, CHRONIC; STENTS;

EID: 84883463489     PISSN: 02671379     EISSN: 15317056     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283639342     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Kim DC, Moon JH, Choi HJ. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at an academic medical center in the era of less-invasive diagnostic tools. Exp Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 6:549-551.
2. Bakman Y, Freeman ML. Update on biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2012; 28:420-426.
3. Cote GA, Imperiale TF, Schmidt SE, et al. Similar efficacies of biliary, with or without pancreatic, sphincterotomy in treatment of idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2012; 143:1502-1509.
4. Dubravcsik Z, Hritz I, Fejes R, et al. Early ERCP and biliary sphincterotomy with or without small-caliber pancreatic stent insertion in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis: better overall outcome with adequate pancreatic drainage. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47:729-736.
5. Yang D, Draganov PV. Indomethacin for postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis prophylaxis: is it the magic bullet? World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:4082-4085.
6. Bhasin DK, Rana SS, Rao C, et al. Endoscopic management of pancreatic injury due to abdominal trauma. J Pancreas 2012; 13:187-192.
7. Kalaitzakis E, Webster GJ, Oppong KW, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic utility of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary lesions and bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24:656-664.
8. Hasan MK, Hawes RH. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreas tumors. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2012; 22:155-167; vii.
9. Levy MJ, Oberg TN, Campion MB, et al. Comparison of methods to detect neoplasia in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastroenterology 2012; 142:1112-1121.
10. Giovannini M. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic drainage. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2012; 22:221-230; viii.
11. Itoi T, Binmoeller KF, Shah J, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel lumenapposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseudocyst and gallbladder drainage (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:870-876.
12. Samuelson AL, Shah RJ. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2012; 41:47-62.
13. Takuma K, Kamisawa T, Hara S, et al. Etiology of recurrent acute pancreatitis, with special emphasis on pancreaticobiliary malformation. Adv Med Sci 2012; 57:244-250.
14. Okan I, Bas G, Sahin M, et al. Diagnostic value of MRCP in biliary pancreatitis: result of long-term follow-up'. Acta chirurgica Belgica 2012; 112:359-364.
15. van Baal MC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2012; 255:860-866.
16. Lu J, Guo CY, Xu XF, et al. Efficacy of intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of nonopaque choledocholith. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:275-278.
17. Asayama Y, Fang W, Stolpen A, et al. Detectability of pancreas divisum in patients with acute pancreatitis on multidetector row computed tomography. Emerg Radiol 2012; 19:121-125.
18. Mosler P, Akisik F, Sandrasegaran K, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreas divisum. Digest Dis Sci 2012; 57:170-174.
19. Taj MA, Leghari A, Qureshi S, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a therapeutic modality in children and adolescents. J Pakistan Med Assoc 2012; 62:98-101.
20. Siddiqui AA, Tholey D, Kedika R, et al. Low but significant yield of endosonography in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction type III with normal imaging studies. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 2012; 21:271-275.
21. Choi EK, McHenry L, Watkins JL, et al. Use of intravenous secretin during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy to facilitate endoscopic clearance of pancreatic duct stones. Pancreatology 2012; 12:272-275.
22. Maruyama M, Arakura N, Ozaki Y, et al. Risk factors for pancreatic stone formation in autoimmune pancreatitis over a long-term course. JGastroenterol 2012; 47:553-560.
23. Pelley JR, Gordon SR, Gardner TB. Abnormal duodenal [HCO3-] following secretin stimulation develops sooner than endocrine insufficiency in minimal change chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2012; 41:481-484.
24. Law R, Lopez R, Costanzo A, et al. Endoscopic pancreatic function test using combined secretin and cholecystokinin stimulation for the evaluation of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:764-768.
25. Sanyal R, Stevens T, Novak E, et al. Secretin-enhanced MRCP: review of technique and application with proposal for quantification of exocrine function. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198:124-132.
26. Del Pozo D, Poves E, Tabernero S, et al. Conventional versus Rosemont endoscopic ultrasoundcriteria forchronicpancreatitis: interobserver agreement in same day back-to-back procedures. Pancreatology 2012; 12:284-287.
27. Gardner TB, Purich ED, Gordon SR. Pancreatic duct compliance after secretin stimulation: a novel endoscopic ultrasound diagnostic tool for chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2012; 41:290-294.
28. Kumon RE, Repaka A, Atkinson M, et al. Characterization of the pancreas in vivo using EUS spectrum analysis with electronic array echoendoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:1175-1183.
29. Saftoiu A, Dietrich CF, Vilmann P. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopy 2012; 44:612-617.
30. Stevens T, Costanzo A, Lopez R, et al. Adding triamcinolone to endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus blockade does not reduce pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10:186-191; 91 e1.
31. Loeve US, Mortensen MB. Lethal necrosis and perforation of the stomach and the aorta after multiple EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis procedures in a patient with chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77:151-152.
32. Puri R, Mishra SR, Thandassery RB, et al. Outcome and complications of endoscopic ultrasound guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage using combined endoprosthesis and naso-cystic drain. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27:722-727.
33. Seewald S, Ang TL, Richter H, et al. Long-term results after endoscopic drainage and necrosectomy of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections. Digest Endosc 2012; 24:36-41.
34. Gong TT, Hu DM, Zhu Q. Contrast-enhanced EUS for differential diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76:301-309.
35. Dawwas MF, Taha H, Leeds JS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative EUS elastography for discriminating malignant from benign solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, single-center study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76:953-961.
36. Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, et al. Efficacy of an artificial neural network-based approach to endoscopic ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of focal pancreaticmasses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10:84-90; e1.
37. Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, et al. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:319-331.
38. Brais RJ, Davies SE, O'Donovan M, et al. Direct histological processing of EUS biopsies enables rapid molecular biomarker analysis for interventional pancreatic cancer trials. Pancreatology 2012; 12:8-15.
39. Ranney N, Phadnis M, Trevino J, et al. Impact of biliary stents on EUSguided FNA of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76:76-83.
40. Atiq M, Bhutani MS, Bektas M, et al. EUS-FNA for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a tertiary cancer center experience. Digest Dis Sci 2012; 57:791-800.
41. Larghi A, Capurso G, Carnuccio A, et al. Ki-67 grading of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on histologic samples obtained by EUSguided fine-needle tissue acquisition: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76:570-577.
42. Wong J, Weber J, Centeno BA, et al. High-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma are frequent in side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm measuring less than 3cm on endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17:78-84; discussion p-5.
43. Zhong N, Zhang L, Takahashi N, et al. Histologic and imaging features of mural nodules in mucinous pancreatic cysts. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10:192-198; 8 e1-e2.
44. Kucera S, Centeno BA, Springett G, et al. Cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen level is not predictive of invasive cancer in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Pancreas 2012; 13:409-413.