Wavelet principal component analysis of fetal movement counting data preceding hospital examinations due to decreased fetal movement: A prospective cohort study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 13, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Winje, Brita Askeland ^a   Røislien, Jo ^a,b   Saastad, Eli ^a   Eide, Jorid ^a   Riley, Christopher Finne ^c   Stray Pedersen, Babill ^b,d   Frøen, J Frederik ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c Østfold Hospital Trust   (Norway)

^d OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Decreased fetal movement; Fetal compromise; Fetal monitoring; Fetal movement chart; Fetal movement counting; Kick chart; Kick counting; Wavelet principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSULTATION; EXPLANATORY VARIABLE; FEMALE; FETUS MOVEMENT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; FETAL DISTRESS; FETAL MOVEMENT; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; PLACENTA DISEASES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

EID: 84883454594     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-172     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Saastad E, Ahlborg T, Froen JF. Low maternal awareness of fetal movement is associated with small for gestational age infants. J Midwifery Womens Health 2008, 53:345-352. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.03.001, 18586188.
2. Saastad E, Tveit JV, Flenady V, Stray-Pedersen B, Fretts R, Bordahl PE, Froen F. Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduces delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women - a clinical quality improvement. BMC Res Notes 2010, 3:2. 10.1186/1756-0500-3-2, 2837670, 20044943.
3. Frøen JF, Saastad E, Tveit JV, Børdahl PE, Stray-Pedersen B. [Clinical practice variation in reduced fetal movements]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2005, 125:2631-2634.
4. Tveit JV, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, Bordahl PE, Flenady V, Fretts R, Froen JF. Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009, 9:32. Erratum in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2010;10:49, 10.1186/1471-2393-9-32, 2734741, 19624847.
5. Tveit JV, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, Bordahl PE, Froen JF. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women presenting with decreased fetal movements in late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009, 88:1345-1351. 10.3109/00016340903348375, 19878088.
6. Frøen JF, Arnestad M, Frey K, Vege T, Saugstad OD, Stray-Pedersen B. Risk factors for sudden intrauterine unexplained death: epidemiologic characteristics of singleton cases in Oslo, Norway, 1986-1995. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 184:694-702. 10.1067/mob.2001.110697, 11262474.
7. Heazell AE, Sumathi GM, Bhatti NR. What investigation is appropriate following maternal perception of reduced fetal movements?. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005, 25:648-650. 10.1080/01443610500278303, 16263536.
8. Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, 1:CD004909. Reprint.
9. O'Sullivan O, Stephen G, Martindale E, Heazell AE. Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009, 29:705-710. 10.3109/01443610903229598, 19821662.
10. Valentin L, Marsal K, Wahlgren L. Subjective recording of fetal movements: III. screening of a pregnant population; the clinical significance of decreased fetal movement counts. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986, 65:753-758. 10.3109/00016348609161495, 3811849.
11. Frøen JF, Heazell AE, Tveit JV, Saastad E, Fretts RC, Flenady V. Fetal movement assessment. Semin Perinatol 2008, 32:243-246. 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.004, 18652921.
12. Heazell AE, Frøen JF. Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008, 28:147-154. 10.1080/01443610801912618, 18393008.
13. Grant AH. Merits of an individualized approach to fetal movement counting compared with fixed-time and fixed-number methods. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984, 91:1087-1090. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb15081.x, 6498123.
14. Valentin L, Marsal K. Subjective recording of fetal movements: II. Screening of a pregnant population; methodological aspects. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986, 65:639-644. 10.3109/00016348609158402, 3799160.
15. Winje BA, Roislien J, Froen JF. Temporal patterns in count-to-ten fetal movement charts and their associations with pregnancy characteristics: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012, 12:124. 10.1186/1471-2393-12-124, 3542088, 23126608.
16. Røislien J, Winje BA. Feature extraction across indivudual time series observations with spikes using wavelet principal component analysis. Statist Med 2013, 32:3660-3669.
17. Pavlov A, Makarov V, Makarova I, Panetsos F. Sorting of neural spikes: when wavelet based methods outperform principal component analysis. Nat Comput 2007, 6:269-281.
18. Englehart K, Hudgins B, Parker PA, Stevenson M. Classification of the myoelectric signal using time-frequency based representations. Med Eng Phys 1999, 21:431-438. 10.1016/S1350-4533(99)00066-1, 10624739.
19. Englehart K, Hudgins B, Parker PA. A wavelet-based continuous classification scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001, 48:302-311. 10.1109/10.914793, 11327498.
20. Winje B, Saastad E, Gunnes N, Tveit J, Stray-Pedersen B, Flenady V, Froen J. Analysis of 'count-to-ten' fetal movement charts: a prospective cohort study. Bjog 2011, 118:1229-1238. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02993.x, 21585644.
21. Directorate for Health and Social Affairs, Norway A National Clinical Guideline For Antenatal Care 2005, Oslo: Directorate for Health and Social Affairs, IS-1339/E edn, Directorate for Health and Social Affairs, Norway.
22. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Reduced Fetal Movements: Green-Top Guideline 57 2011, London: NHS Evidence accredited provider, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
23. Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P, Gjessing HK. eSNURRA [eSnurra]. [updated 2007; cited 2011 Nov 11] Available from: http://www.nsfm.no/esnurra/0.php.
24. Gjessing HK, Grottum P, Eik-Nes SH. A direct method for ultrasound prediction of day of delivery: a new, population-based approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007, 30:19-27. 10.1002/uog.4053, 17557369.
25. Okland I, Nakling J, Gjessing HK, Grottum P, Eik-Nes SH. Advantages of the population-based approach to pregnancy dating: results from 23,020 ultrasound examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012, 39:563-568. 10.1002/uog.10081, 21898635.
26. Winje BA, Roald B, Kristensen NP, Froen JF. Placental pathology in pregnancies with maternally perceived decreased fetal movement-a population-based nested case-cohort study. PLoS One 2012, 7:e39259. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039259, 3378526, 22723978.
27. Turowski G, Berge LN, Helgadottir LB, Jacobsen EM, Roald B. A new, clinically oriented, unifying and simple placental classification system. Placenta 2012, 33:1026-1035. 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.10.002, 23110739.
28. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputations For Nonresponse In Surveys 1987, NY: Wiley.
29. Rubin D. Formalizing subjective notions about the effect of nonrespondents in sample surveys. J Am Stat Assoc 1977, 77:538-543.
30. Nason G. Wavelet Methods In Statistics With R 2008, NY: Springer.
31. Vidakovic B. Statistical Modeling By Wavelets 1999, NY: Wiley.
32. Joliffe I. Principal Components Analysis 2002, NY: Springer, 2.
33. Wolfinger R, O'Conell M. Generalized linear mixed models: a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comput Simul 1933, 48:233-243.
34. R Development Core Team. R 2.12 A Language And Environment For Statistical Computing 2011, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Ref Type: Computer Program, R Development Core Team. R 2.12.
35. Moore TR, Piacquadio K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989, 160:1075-1080. 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90164-6, 2729383.
36. Berbey R, Manduley A, Vigil-De Gracia P. Counting fetal movements as a universal test for fetal wellbeing. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2001, 74:293-295.
37. Sinha D, Sharma A, Nallaswamy V, Jayagopal N, Bhatti N. Obstetric outcome in women complaining of reduced fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007, 27:41-43. 10.1080/01443610601016909, 17365457.
38. Ehrstrom C. Fetal movement monitoring in normal and high-risk pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 1979, 80:1-32.
39. Grant A, Valentin L, Elbourne D, Alexander S. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet 1989, 2:345-349.
40. Pearson JF, Weaver JB. Fetal activity and fetal wellbeing: an evaluation. Br Med J 1976, 1:1305-1307. 10.1136/bmj.1.6021.1305, 1640347, 1268677.
41. Rayburn WF, McKean HE. Maternal perception of fetal movement and perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1980, 56:161-164.
42. Valentin L, Marsal K. Pregnancy outcome in women perceiving decreased fetal movement. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987, 24:23-32. 10.1016/0028-2243(87)90033-5, 3817269.
43. Rosier-van Dunne FM, van Wezel-Meijler G, Bakker MP, Odendaal HJ, de Vries JI. Fetal general movements and brain sonography in a population at risk for preterm birth. Early Hum Dev 2010, 86:107-111. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.01.026, 20188499.
44. Erlandsson K, Lindgren H, Davidsson-Bremborg A, Radestad I. Women's premonitions prior to the death of their baby in utero and how they deal with the feeling that their baby may be unwell. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012, 91:28-33. 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01209.x, 21668416.
45. Frøen JF. A kick from within - fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. J Perinat Med 2004, 32:13-24.
46. Saastad E, Winje BA, Stray Pedersen B, Frøen JF. Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes - a multi-centre, randomized, Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(12):e28482. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028482, 3244397, 22205952.
47. Neldam S. Fetal movements as an indicator of fetal well-being. Dan Med Bull 1983, 30:274-278.