Applying the "studio model" to learning technology design

Educating Learning Technology Designers: Guiding and Inspiring Creators of Innovative Educational Tools

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 145-164

  Cox, Charlie ^a   Harrison, Steve ^b   Hoadley, Christopher ^a,c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883444156     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203357217     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Barrows , H. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481-486.
2. Budgen , D. (1995). "Design models" from software design methods. Design Studies, 16(3), 293-325.
3. Clark , R. , & Estes , F. (1998) Technology or craft: What are we doing? Educational Technology, 38(5), 5-11.
4. Dannels , D. (2005). Performing tribal rituals: A genre analysis of "crits" in design studios. Communication Education, 54(2), 136-160.
5. Gagné , R. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6. Gauldie , S. (1969). Architecture. London: Oxford University Press.
7. Hazzan , O. , & Karni , E. (2006). Similarities and differences in the academic education of software engineering and architectural design professionals. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 285-306.
8. Hmelo-Silver , C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
9. Hoadley , C. , & Cox , C. (2005). Educating reflective learner centered designers. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications 2005. Montreal: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
10. Keller , J. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Kuhn , S. (1998). The software design studio: An exploration. IEEE Software, 15(2), 65-71.
12. Lave , J. , & Wenger , E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Mezirow , J. (1978). Perspective transformation. Adult Education, 28(2), 100-109.
14. Norman , D. (2002). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
15. Stead , N. (2003). Producing critical thinkers, designing critical objects: Reexamining the role of critique in architectural education. Paper presented at the Second International Conference of the Association of Architectural Schools of Australasia, September, Melbourne, Australia.
16. Willenbrock , L. (1991). An undergraduate voice in architectural education. In T. Dutton (Ed.), Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy (pp. 97-120). New York: Bergin & Garvey.
17. Wood , P. (2003). The critique: An investigation into the critical role of the design critique in architectural education. Paper presented at the Second International Conference of the Association of Architectural Schools of Australasia, September Melbourne, Australia.