Publishing scientific software matters

Journal of Computational Science

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 311-312

  Pradal, Christophe ^a,b   Varoquaux, Gaël ^c,d   Langtangen, Hans Peter ^e,f  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b UMR AGAP   (France)

^c INRIA SACLAY   (France)

^d NeuroSpin   (France)

^e SIMULA RESEARCH LABORATORY   (Norway)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883441342     PISSN: 18777503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2013.08.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Baxter S.M., Day S.W., Fetrow J.S., Reisinger S.J. Scientific software development is not an oxymoron. PLoS Computational Biology 2006, 2:e87.
2. Buckheit J.B., Donoho D.L. Wavelab and Reproducible Research 1995, Springer.
3. Dongarra J.J., Grosse E. Distribution of mathematical software via electronic mail. Communications of the ACM 1987, 30:403-407.
4. Dubois P.F., Epperly T., Kumfert G. Why johnny can't build [portable scientific software]. Computing in Science & Engineering 2003, 5:83-88.
5. Glass R.L. Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering 2002, Addison-Wesley Professional.
6. Joppa L.N., McInerny G., Harper R., Salido L., Takeda K., O'Hara K., Gavaghan D., Emmott S. Troubling trends in scientific software use. Science 2013, 340:814-815.
7. Neylon C., Aerts J., Brown C., Coles S.J., Hatton L., Lemire D., Millman K., Murray-Rust P., Perez F., Saunders N.F., et al. Changing computational research. the challenges ahead. Source Code for Biology and Medicine 2012, 7:2.
8. V. Stodden, The scientific method in practice: reproducibility in the computational sciences (2010).
9. Wilson G.V. Where's the real bottleneck in scientific computing?. American Scientist 2006, 94:5.
10. Walter S.F., Lehmann L. Algorithmic differentiation in Python with AlgoPy. Journal of Computational Science 2013, 4:334-344.
11. Wilbert N., Zito T., Schuppner R.-B., Je{ogonek}drzejewski-Szmek Z., Wiskott L., Berkes P. Building extensible frameworks for data processing: The case of MDP, Modular toolkit for Data Processing. Journal of Computational Science 2013, 4:345-351.
12. Rossant C., Fontaine B., Goodman D.F.M. Playdoh: A lightweight Python library for distributed computing and optimisation. Journal of Computational Science 2013, 4:352-359.
13. Fiers M., Lambert E., Pathak S., Maes B., Bienstman P., Bogaerts W., Dumon P. Improving the design cycle for nanophotonic components. Journal of Computational Science 2013, 4:313-324.
14. Bianchi R.M., Brunelière R. WatchMan project-A Python CASE framework for High Energy Physics data analysis in the LHC era. Journal of Computational Science 2013, 4:325-333.