Effect of increasing temperatures on the distribution of spruce beetle in Engelmann spruce forests of the Interior West, USA

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 308, Issue , 2013, Pages 198-206

  DeRose, R Justin ^a   Bentz, Barbara J ^a   Long, James N ^b   Shaw, John D ^a  

^a ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

BIOMOD; Forest Inventory and Analysis; Global climate change; Niche modeling; Species distribution modeling

Indexed keywords

BIOMOD; EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE; FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS; GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES; GLOBAL CLIMATE MODEL; INCREASING TEMPERATURES; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELING; TEMPERATURE VARIABLES;

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; CLIMATE CHANGE; DISEASE CONTROL; ECOSYSTEMS; FORECASTING;

FORESTRY;

BASAL AREA; BEETLE; CLIMATE EFFECT; CLIMATE MODELING; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; ENDEMIC SPECIES; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GLOBAL CLIMATE; HABITAT SELECTION; PEST CONTROL; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SEASONAL VARIATION; STAND STRUCTURE; TIME DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORECASTS; FORESTRY; INVENTORY CONTROL;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84883395943     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.061     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allouche O., Tsoar A., Kamon R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43:1223-1232.
2. Araújo M.B., New M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:42-47.
3. Araújo M.B., Pearson R.G., Thuiller W., Erhard M. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biol. 2005, 11:1504-1513.
4. Bechtold, W.A., Patterson, P.L., 2005. The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program - national sampling design and estimation procedures. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-80, p. 85.
5. Bentz B.J., Regniere J., Fettig C.J., Matthew Hanson.E., Hayes J.L., Hicke J.A., Kelsey R.G., Negron J.F., Seybold S.J. Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. BioScience 2010, 60:602-613.
6. Berg E.E., Henry D.J., Fastie C.L., De Volder A.D., Matsuoka S.M. Spruce beetle outbreaks on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and Kluane National Park and Reserve, Yukon Territory: relationship to summer temperatures and regional differences in disturbance regimes. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2006, 227:219-232.
7. Buckley L.B., Waaser S.A., MacLean H.J., Fox R. Does including physiology improve species distribution model predictions of responses to recent climate change?. Ecology 2011, 92:2214-2221.
8. Cook E.R., Meko D.M., Stahle D.W., Cleaveland M.K. Drought reconstructions for the continental united States. J. Climate 1999, 12:1145-1162.
9. DeRose R.J., Long J.N. Disturbance, structure, and composition: spruce beetle and Engelmann spruce forests on the Markagunt Plateau, Utah. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 244:16-23.
10. DeRose R.J., Long J.N. Factors influencing the spatial and temporal dynamics of Engelmann spruce mortality during a spruce beetle outbreak. Forest Sci. 2012, 58:1-14.
11. DeRose R.J., Long J.N., Ramsey R.D. Combining dendrochronological data and the disturbance index to assess Engelmann spruce mortality caused by a spruce beetle outbreak in southern Utah, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115:2342-2349.
12. DeRose, R.J., Long, J.N., Shaw, J.D., 2009. Relationships between forest structure, composition, site, and spruce beetle occurrence in the Intermountain West. In: McWilliams, Will; Moisen, Gretchen; Czaplewski, Ray, comps. 2008. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Symposium 2008; October 21-23, 2008; Park City, UT. Proc. RMRS-P-56CD. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 1 CD. Fort Collins, CO.
13. Diaz H.F., Benison M., Bradley R.S. Climate Change at High Elevation Sites 1997, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
14. Ducey M.J. The ratio of additive and traditional stand density indices. Western J. Appl. Forestry 2009, 24:5-10.
15. Dymerski A.D., Anhold J.A., Munson A.S. Spruce beetle dendroctonus rufipennis outbreak in Engelmann spruce picea engelmannii in central Utah, 1986-1998. Western North Am. Nat. 2001, 61:19-24.
16. Easterling D.R., Horton B., Jones P.D., Peterson T.C., Karl T.R., Parker D.E., Salinger M.J., Razuvayev V., Plummer N., Jamason P., Folland C.K. Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe. Science 1997, 277:364-367.
17. Evangelista P.H., Kumar S., Stohlgren T.J., Young N.E. Assessing forest vulnerability and the potential distribution of pine beetles under current and future climate scenarios in the Interior West of the US. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2011, 262:307-316.
18. Fielding A.H., Bell J.F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conservation 1997, 24:38-49.
19. Garbutt, R., Hawkes, B., Allen, E., 2006. Spruce Beetle and the Forests of the Southwest Yukon. Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Pacific Forestry Centre Information Report 80.
20. Hansen E.M., Bentz B.J. Comparison of reproductive capacity among univoltine, semivoltine, and re-emerged parent spruce beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomologist 2003, 135:697-712.
21. Hansen E.M., Bentz B.J., Munson S., Vandygriff J.C., Turner D.L. Evaluation of funnel traps for estimating tree mortality and associated population phase of spruce beetle in Utah. Can. J. Forest Res. 2006, 36:2574-2584.
22. Hansen E.M., Bentz B.J., Powell J.A., Gray D.R., Vandygriff J.C. Prepupal diapause and instar IV developmental rates of the spruce beetle, dendroctonus rufipennis (coleoptera: curculionidae, scolytinae). J. Insect Physiol. 2011, 57:1347-1357.
23. Hansen E.M., Bentz B.J., Turner D.L. Temperature-based model for predicting univoltine brood proportions in spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomologist 2001, 133:827-841.
24. Hansen E.M., Negron J.F., Munson A.S., Anhold J.A. A retrospective assessment of partial cutting to reduce spruce beetle-caused mortality in southern Rocky Mountains. Western J. Appl. Forestry 2010, 25:81-87.
25. Hijmans R.J., Cameron S.E., Parra J.L., Jones P.G., Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2005, 25:1965-1978.
26. Hirst A.C., Gordon H.B., O'Farrell S.P. Global warming in a coupled climate model including oceanic eddy-induced advection. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1996, 23:3361-3364.
27. Hirst A.C., O'Farrell S.P., Gordon H.B. Comparison of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model with and without oceanic eddy-induced advection. Part I: Ocean spinup and control integrations. J. Climate 2000, 13:139-163.
28. Hof A.R., Jansson R., Nilsson C. The usefulness of elevation as a predictor variable in species distribution modelling. Ecol. Modell. 2012, 246:86-90.
29. IPCC, 2007. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2007: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press.
30. 2 matters!. Global Change Biol. 2011, 17:565-579.
31. McRoberts R.E., Bechtold W.A., Patterson P.L., Scott C.T., Reams G.A. The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program of the USDA forest service: historical perspective and announcement of statistical documentation. J. Forestry 2005, 103:304-308.
32. Miller L.K., Werner R.A. Cold-hardiness of adult and larval spruce beetles Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby) in interior Alaska. Can. J. Zool. 1987, 65:2927-2930.
33. Mock C.J. Climatic controls and spatial variations of precipitation in the Western United States. J. Climate 1996, 9:1111-1125.
34. Morin X., Thuiller W. Comparing niche- and process-based models to reduce prediction uncertainty in species range shifts under climate change. Ecology 2009, 90:1301-1313.
35. Pearman P.B., Guisan A., Broennimann O., Randin C.F. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:149-158.
36. Raffa K.F., Aukema B.H., Bentz B.J., Carroll A.L., Hicke J.A., Turner M.G., Romme W.H. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. BioScience 2008, 58:501-517.
37. Rehfeldt G.E., Crookston N.L., Warwell M.V., Evans J.S. Empirical analyses of plant-climate relationships for the western United States. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2006, 167:1123-1150.
38. Reynolds K.M., Holsten E.H. Relative importance of risk factors for spruce beetle outbreaks. Can. J. Forest Res. 1994, 24:2089-2095.
39. Rousseau J., Bauce E., Lavallee R., Guertin C. Winter mortality and supercooling point of the spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) not affected by host tree vigor in Nova Scotia, Canada. J. Acadian Entomol. Soc. 2012, 8:1-10.
40. Saupe E.E., Barve V., Myers C.E., Soberón J., Barve N., Hensz C.M., Peterson A.T., Owens H.L., Lira-Noriega A. Variation in niche and distribution model performance: the need for a priori assessment of key causal factors. Ecol. Modell. 2012, 237-238:11-22.
41. Schmid, J.M., Frye, R.H., 1976. Stand ratings for spruce beetles. USDA Forest Service RN-RM-309, p. 4.
42. Shinker J.J., Bartlein P.J., Shuman B. Synoptic and dynamic climate controls of North American mid-continental aridity. Quaternary Sci. Rev. 2006, 25:1401-1417.
43. Thuiller W. BIOMOD - optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global Change Biol. 2003, 9:1353-1362.
44. Veblen T.T., Hadley K.S., Nel E.M., Kitzberger T., Reid M., Villalba R. Disturbance regime and disturbance interactions in a Rocky Mountain subalpine forest. J. Ecol. 1994, 82:125-135.
45. Veblen T.T., Hadley K.S., Reid M.S., Rebertus A.J. The response of subalpine forests to spruce beetle outbreak in Colorado. Ecology 1991, 72:213-231.
46. Zhang Q.B., Alfaro R.I., Hebda R.J. Dendroecological studies of tree growth, climate and spruce beetle outbreaks in central British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecol. Manage. 1999, 121:215-225.