Glycosylated linkers in multimodular lignocellulose-degrading enzymes dynamically bind to cellulose

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 36, 2013, Pages 14646-14651

  Payne, Christina M ^a,b   Resch, Michael G ^a   Chen, Liqun ^c   Crowley, Michael F ^a   Himmel, Michael E ^a   Taylor II, Larry E ^a   Sandgren, Mats ^d   Stah̊lberg, Jerry ^d   Stals, Ingeborg ^e,f   Tan, Zhongping ^c   Beckham, Gregg T ^a,g  

^a NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE GHENT   (Belgium)

^f GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^g Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Carbohydrate recognition; Cellulase; Post translational modification

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; FUNGAL PROTEIN; LIGNIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CATALYSIS; CELL WALL; ENZYME DEGRADATION; GLYCOSYLATION; HYPOCREA JECORINA; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PLANT CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BINDING COMPETITION; BINDING SITE; BIOCATALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYMOLOGY; HYDROLYSIS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; TRICHODERMA;

HYPOCREA JECORINA;

BINDING SITES; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; BIOCATALYSIS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4-BETA-CELLOBIOSIDASE; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GLYCOSYLATION; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; TRICHODERMA;

EID: 84883372876     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309106110     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66(3):506-577. (Pubitemid 35005827)
2. Kirk TK, Farrell RL (1987) Enzymatic "combustion": The microbial degradation of lignin. Annu Rev Microbiol 41:465-505.
3. Floudas D, et al. (2012) The Paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science 336(6089):1715-1719.
4. Davies GJ, Gloster TM, Henrissat B (2005) Recent structural insights into the expanding world of carbohydrate-active enzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15(6):637-645. (Pubitemid 41668519)
5. Lombard V, et al. (2010) A hierarchical classification of polysaccharide lyases for glycogenomics. Biochem J 432(3):437-444.
6. Cantarel BL, et al. (2009) The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): An expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Database issue):D233-D238.
7. Vaaje-Kolstad G, et al. (2010) An oxidative enzyme boosting the enzymatic conversion of recalcitrant polysaccharides. Science 330(6001):219-222.
8. Quinlan RJ, et al. (2011) Insights into the oxidative degradation of cellulose by a copper metalloenzyme that exploits biomass components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(37):15079-15084.
9. Beeson WT, Phillips CM, Cate JHD, Marletta MA (2012) Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by fungal copper-dependent polysaccharidemonooxygenases. J AmChem Soc 134(2):890-892.
10. Levasseur A, Drula E, Lombard V, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B (2013) Expansion of the enzymatic repertoire of the CAZy database to integrate auxiliary redox enzymes. Biotechnol Biofuels 6(1):41.
11. Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ (2004) Carbohydrate-binding modules: Fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J 382(Pt 3):769-781. (Pubitemid 39312891)
12. Lehtiö J, et al. (2003) The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(2):484-489. (Pubitemid 36126077)
13. Hervé C, et al. (2010) Carbohydrate-binding modules promote the enzymatic deconstruction of intact plant cell walls by targeting and proximity effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(34):15293-15298.
14. Srisodsuk M, Reinikainen T, Penttilä M, Teeri TT (1993) Role of the interdomain linker peptide of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I in its interaction with crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 268(28):20756-20761. (Pubitemid 23292244)
15. Zverlov VV, et al. (1998) Multidomain structure and cellulosomal localization of the Clostridium thermocellum cellobiohydrolase CbhA. J Bacteriol 180(12):3091-3099. (Pubitemid 28285021)
16. Carvalho AL, et al. (2003) Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin-dockerin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(24):13809-13814. (Pubitemid 37499148)
17. Bayer EA, Belaich JP, Shoham Y, Lamed R (2004) The cellulosomes: Multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Annu Rev Microbiol 58:521-554. (Pubitemid 39551996)
18. Demain AL, Newcomb M, Wu JHD (2005) Cellulase, clostridia, and ethanol. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69(1):124-154. (Pubitemid 40360711)
19. Fontes C, Gilbert HJ (2010) Cellulosomes: Highly efficient nanomachines designed to deconstruct plant cell wall complex carbohydrates. Annual Review of Biochemistry, eds Kornberg RD, Raetz CRH, Rothman JE, Thorner JW (Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA), Vol 79, pp 655-681.
20. Receveur V, Czjzek M, Schülein M, Panine P, Henrissat B (2002) Dimension, shape, and conformational flexibility of a two domain fungal cellulase in solution probed by small angle X-ray scattering. J Biol Chem 277(43):40887-40892. (Pubitemid 35215675)
21. Poon DKY, Withers SG, McIntosh LP (2007) Direct demonstration of the flexibility of the glycosylated proline-threonine linker in the Cellulomonas fimi Xylanase Cex through NMR spectroscopic analysis. J Biol Chem 282(3):2091-2100. (Pubitemid 47076696)
22. Currie MA, et al. (2012) Scaffoldin conformation and dynamics revealed by a ternary complex from the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome. J Biol Chem 287(32):26953-26961.
23. Beckham GT, et al. (2010) The O-glycosylated linker from the Trichoderma reesei Family 7 cellulase is a flexible, disordered protein. Biophys J 99(11):3773-3781.
24. Sammond DW, et al. (2012) Cellulase linkers are optimized based on domain type and function: Insights from sequence analysis, biophysical measurements, and molecular simulation. PLoS ONE 7(11):e48615.
25. Hu JP, et al. (2001) Characterization of cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) glycoforms from extracts of Trichoderma reesei using capillary isoelectric focusing and electrospray mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 752(2):349-368.
26. Harrison MJ, et al. (1998) Modified glycosylation of cellobiohydrolase I from a high cellulase-producing mutant strain of Trichoderma reesei. Eur J Biochem 256(1):119-127. (Pubitemid 28399103)
27. Stals I, et al. (2004) Factors influencing glycosylation of Trichoderma reesei cellulases. I: Postsecretorial changes of the O- and N-glycosylation pattern of Cel7A. Glycobiology 14(8):713-724. (Pubitemid 39161978)
28. Shen H, et al. (1991) Deletion of the linker connection the catalytic and CBD of endoglucanase-A (CenA) of Cellulomonas fimi alters its conformation and catalytic activity. J Biol Chem 266(17):11335-11340. (Pubitemid 21906951)
29. Ma BY, Tsai CJ, Haliloǧlu T, Nussinov R (2011) Dynamic allostery: Linkers are not merely flexible. Structure 19(7):907-917.
30. Himmel ME, et al. (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315(5813):804-807.
31. Divne C, Ståhlberg J, Teeri TT, Jones TA (1998) High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 A long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. J Mol Biol 275(2):309-325. (Pubitemid 28030006)
32. Divne C, et al. (1994) The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Science 265(5171):524-528. (Pubitemid 24264997)
33. Zou J-y, et al. (1999) Crystallographic evidence for substrate ring distortion and protein conformational changes during catalysis in cellobiohydrolase Ce16A from trichoderma reesei. Structure 7(9):1035-1045.
34. Payne CM, et al. (2012) Hallmarks of processivity in glycoside hydrolases from crystallographic and computational studies of the Serratia marcescens chitinases. J Biol Chem 287(43):36322-36330.
35. Payne CM, et al. (2011) Multiple functions of aromatic-carbohydrate interactions in a processive cellulase examined with molecular simulation. J Biol Chem 286(47):41028-41035.
36. Igarashi K, et al. (2009) High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 284(52):36186-36190.
37. Nakamura A, et al. (2013) The tryptophan residue at the active site tunnel entrance of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase Cel7A is important for initiation of degradation of crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 288(19):13503-13510.
38. Koivula A, et al. (1998) Tryptophan 272: An essential determinant of crystalline cellulose degradation by Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase Cel6A. FEBS Lett 429(3):341-346. (Pubitemid 28300388)
39. Linder M, et al. (1995) Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Protein Sci 4(6):1056-1064.
40. Kraulis J, et al. (1989) Determination of the three-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. A study using nuclear magnetic resonance and hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing. Biochemistry 28(18):7241-7257.
41. Ting CL, Makarov DE, Wang ZG (2009) A kinetic model for the enzymatic action of cellulase. J Phys Chem B 113(14):4970-4977.
42. Dunker AK, et al. (2001) Intrinsically disordered protein. J Mol Graph Model 19(1):26- 59.
43. van Aalten DMF, et al. (2000) Structure of a two-domain chitotriosidase from Serratia marcescens at 1.9-A resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(11):5842-5847.
44. Barr BK, Hsieh YL, Ganem B, Wilson DB (1996) Identification of two functionally different classes of exocellulases. Biochemistry 35(2):586-592. (Pubitemid 26032711)
45. Igarashi K, et al. (2011) Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 333(6047):1279-1282.
46. Chanzy H, Henrissat B (1985) Unidirectional degradation of Valonia cellulose microcrystals subjected to cellulase action. FEBS Lett 184(2):285-288.
47. Deshpande N, Wilkins MR, Packer N, Nevalainen H (2008) Protein glycosylation pathways in filamentous fungi. Glycobiology 18(8):626-637.
48. Beckham GT, et al. (2011) Molecular-level origins of biomass recalcitrance: decrystallization free energies for four common cellulose polymorphs. J Phys Chem B 115(14):4118-4127.
49. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Ibeta from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124(31):9074-9082. (Pubitemid 34847668)
50. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T (2006) The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22(2):195-201. (Pubitemid 43205406)
51. Mackerell AD, Jr., Feig M, Brooks CL, 3rd (2004) Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 25(11):1400-1415.
52. Guvench O, Hatcher ER, Venable RM, Pastor RW, Mackerell AD (2009) CHARMM additive all-atom force field for glycosidic linkages between hexopyranoses. J Chem Theory Comput 5(9):2353-2370.
53. Guvench O, et al. (2011) CHARMM additive all-atom force field for carbohydrate derivatives and its utility in polysaccharide and carbohydrate-protein modeling. J Chem Theory Comput 7(10):3162-3180.
54. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926-935.
55. Brooks BR, et al. (2009) CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30(10):1545-1614.
56. Phillips JC, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26(16):1781-1802. (Pubitemid 43078511)