A mathematical evaluation of hemodynamic parameters after carotid eversion and conventional patch angioplasty

American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology

Volumn 305, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Kamenskiy, Alexey V ^a   Pipinos, Iraklis I ^a   Dzenis, Yuris A ^b   Gupta, Prateek K ^c   Kazmi, Syed A Jaffar ^a   MacTaggart, Jason N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; Carotid artery; Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty; Carotid eversion endarterectomy; Finite element Analysis; Hemodynamics; Mathematical modeling; Mechanics; Patch angioplasty

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ANGIOPLASTY; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; CAROTID ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CAROTID EVERSION ENDARTERECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATCH ANGIOPLASTY; POLITEF IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; RESTENOSIS; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; SUTURE;

ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY WITH PATCH ANGIOPLASTY; CAROTID EVERSION ENDARTERECTOMY; FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEMODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; MECHANICS; PATCH ANGIOPLASTY;

ANGIOPLASTY; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CAROTID ARTERIES; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASES; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84883353287     PISSN: 03636135     EISSN: 15221539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00034.2013     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Saiedy S, Richmond BK, Khan J. Prospective randomized trial of bilateral carotid endarterectomies: primary closure versus patching. Stroke 30: 1185-1189, 1999.
2. Ballotta E, Giau Da G, Saladini M, Abbruzzese E, Renon L, Toniato A. Carotid endarterectomy with patch closure versus carotid eversion endarterectomy and reimplantation: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 125: 271-279, 1999.
3. Ballotta E, Renon L, Giau Da G, Toniato A, Baracchini C, Abbruzzese E, Saladini M, Moscardo P. A prospective randomized study on bilateral carotid endarterectomy: patching versus eversion. Ann Surg 232: 119-125, 2000.
4. Bassini M, Gatti E, Longo T, Martinis G, Pignoli P, Pizzolati PL. In vivo recording of blood velocity profiles and studies in vitro of profile alterations induced by known stenoses. Tex Heart Inst J 9: 185-194, 1982.
5. Bates ER, Babb JD, Casey DE, Cates CU, Duckwiler GR, Feldman TE, Gray WA, Ouriel K, Peterson ED, Rosenfield K, Rundback JH, Safian RD, Sloan MA, White CJ. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document). J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 126-170, 2007.
6. Bathe KJ. Finite Element Procedures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.
7. Biasetti J, Hussain F, Gasser TC. Blood flow and coherent vortices in the normal and aneurysmatic aortas: a fluid dynamical approach to intra-luminal thrombus formation. J R Soc Interface 8: 1449-1461, 2011.
8. Bond R, Rerkasem K, Naylor AR, Aburahma AF, Rothwell PM. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 40: 1126-1135, 2004.
9. Busse R, Bauer RD, Schabert A, Summa Y, Bumm P, Wetterer E. The mechanical properties of exposed human common carotid arteries in vivo. Basic Res Cardiol 74: 545-554, 1979.
10. Byrne J, Feustel P, Darling RC. Primary closure, routine patching, and eversion endarterectomy: what is the current state of the literature supporting use of these techniques? Semin Vasc Surg 20: 226-35, 2007.
11. Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P, Zannetti S, Chiesa R, Coppi G, Palombo D, Peinetti F, Spartera C, Stancanelli V, et al. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 31: 19-30, 2000.
12. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Atheroma and arterial wall shear. Observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 177: 109-159, 1971.
13. Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M, Edelman ER, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 2379-2393, 2007.
14. Cho YI, Kensey KR. Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part 1: steady flows. Biorheology 28: 241-262, 1991.
15. Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM. Mechanisms of stenosis after arterial injury. Lab Invest 49: 208-215, 1983.
16. Crawford RS, Chung TK, Hodgman T, Pedraza JD, Corey M, Cambria RP. Restenosis after eversion vs patch closure carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 46: 41-48, 2007.
17. Ford MD, Xie YJ, Wasserman BA, Steinman DA. Is flow in the common carotid artery fully developed? Physiol Meas 29: 1335-1349, 2008.
18. Forster FK, Chikos PM, Frazier JS. Geometric modeling of the carotid bifurcation in humans: implications in ultrasonic Doppler and radiologic investigations. J Clin Ultrasound 13: 385-390, 1985.
19. Fox AJ. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 186: 316-318, 1993.
20. Fry DL. Mathematical models of arterial transmural transport. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 248: H240-H263, 1985.
21. Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface 3: 15-35, 2006.
22. Gay M, Zhang LT. Numerical studies of blood flow in healthy, stenosed, and stented carotid arteries. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 61: 453-472, 2009.
23. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elasticity 61: 1-48, 2000.
24. Humphrey J, Eberth J, Dye W, Gleason R. Fundamental role of axial stress in compensatory adaptations by arteries. J Biomech 42: 1-8, 2009.
25. Humphrey JD. Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs. New York: Springer, 2002.
26. Hyun S, Kleinstreuer C, Archie JP. Computer simulation and geometric design of endarterectomized carotid artery bifurcations. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 28: 53-59, 2000.
27. Hyun S, Kleinstreuer C, Archie JP. Computational particle-hemodynamics analysis and geometric reconstruction after carotid endarterectomy. Comput Biol Med 31: 365-84, 2001.
28. Jeong J, Hussain F. On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 285: 69-94, 1995.
29. Johnston BM, Johnston PR, Corney S, Kilpatrick D. Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. J Biomech 37: 709-720, 2004.
30. Kamenskiy AV, Dzenis YA, MacTaggart J, Desyatova AS, Pipinos II. In vivo three-dimensional blood velocity profile shapes in the human common, internal and external carotid arteries. J Vasc Surg 54: P1011-1020, 2011.
31. Kamenskiy AV, Dzenis YA, MacTaggart JN, Lynch TG, Kazmi SAJ, Pipinos II. Nonlinear mechanical behavior of the human common, external and internal carotid arteries in vivo. J Surg Res 176: 329-336, 2012.
32. Kamenskiy AV, MacTaggart JN, Pipinos I, Bikhchandani J, Dzenis YA. Three-dimensional geometry of the human carotid artery. J Biomech Eng 134: 64502, 2012.
33. Kamenskiy AV, MacTaggart JN, Pipinos II, Gupta PK, Dzenis YA. Hemodynamically motivated choice of patch angioplasty for the performance of carotid endarterectomy. Ann Biomed Eng 41: 263-278, 2013.
34. Kamenskiy AV, Pipinos II, Desyatova AS, Salkovskiy YE, Kossovich LY, Kirillova IV, Bockeria LA, Morozov KM, Polyaev VO, Lynch TG, Dzenis YA. Finite element model of the patched human carotid. Vasc Endovasc Surg 43: 533-541, 2009.
35. Kamenskiy AV, Pipinos II, MacTaggart J, Kazmi SAJ, Dzenis YA. Comparative analysis of the biaxial mechanical behavior of carotid wall tissue and biological and synthetic materials used for carotid patch angioplasty. J Biomech Eng 133: 111008, 2011.
36. Katras T, Baltazar U, Rush DS, Sutterfield WC, Harvill LM, Stanton PE. Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy: comparison with primary closure and carotid patch angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 34: 453-458, 2001.
37. Kleinstreuer C. Hemodynamics analysis of a stenosed carotid bifurcation and its plaque-mitigating design. J Biomech Eng 113: 330, 2008.
38. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 5: 293-302, 1985.
39. Kuntelia K, Raithel D. Carotid artery eversion endarterectomy versus open trombendarterectomy and patch plasty. Anna Biomed Res Educ 3: 230-232, 2003.
40. Lee SE, Lee SW, Fischer PF, Bassiouny HS, Loth F. Direct numerical simulation of transitional flow in a stenosed carotid bifurcation. J Biomech 41: 2551-2561, 2008.
41. Lee SW, Antiga L, Spence JD, Steinman DA. Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow. Stroke 39: 2341-2347, 2008.
42. Liang YL, Cameron JD, Teede H, Kotsopoulos D, McGrath BP. Reproducibility of arterial compliance and carotid wall thickness measurements in normal subjects. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 25: 618-620, 1998.
43. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamics shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282: 2035-2042, 1999.
44. Maurits NM, Loots GE, Veldman AEP. The influence of vessel wall elasticity and peripheral resistance on the carotid artery flow wave form: a CFD model compared to in vivo ultrasound measurements. J Biomech 40: 427-436, 2007.
45. Muto A, Nishibe T, Dardik H, Dardik A. Patches for carotid artery endarterectomy: current materials and prospects. J Vasc Surg 50: 206-213, 2009.
46. Perktold K, Peter RO, Resch M, Langs G. Pulsatile non-Newtonian blood flow in three-dimensional carotid bifurcation models: a numerical study of flow phenomena under different bifurcation angles. J Biomed Eng 13: 507-15, 1991.
47. Perktold K, Rappitsch G. Computer-simulation of local blood-flow and vessel mechanics in a compliant carotid-artery bifurcation model. J Biomech 28: 845-856, 1995.
48. Perktold K, Resch M, Florian H. Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech Eng 113: 464-475, 1991.
49. Rockman CB, Halm EA, Wang JJ, Chassin MR, Tuhrim S, Formisano P, Riles TS. Primary closure of the carotid artery is associated with poorer outcomes during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 42: 870-877, 2005.
50. Rosenthal D, Archie JP, Avila MH, Bandyk DF, Carmichael JD, Clagett GP, Hamman JL, Lee HM, Liebman PR, Mills JL, Minken SL, Plonk GW, Posner MP, Smith RB, String ST. Secondary recurrent carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 24: 424, 1996.
51. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature 362: 801-809, 1993.
52. Ruggeri ZM, Mendolicchio GL. Adhesion mechanisms in platelet function. Circ Res 100: 1673-1685, 2007.
53. Schulze-Bauer CA, Mörth C, Holzapfel GA. Passive biaxial mechanical response of aged human iliac arteries. J Biomech Eng 125: 395, 2003.
54. Sommer G, Holzapfel GA. 3D constitutive modeling of the biaxial mechanical response of intact and layer-dissected human carotid arteries. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 5: 116-28, 2012.
55. Sommer G, Regitnig P, Koltringer L, Holzapfel GA. Biaxial mechanical properties of intact and layer-dissected human carotid arteries at physiological and supra-physiological loadings. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298: H898-H912, 2010.
56. Steinman DA. Image-based computational fluid dynamics modeling in realistic arterial geometries. Ann Biomed Eng 30: 483-497, 2002.
57. Sugawara M, Niki K, Furuhata H, Ohnishi S, Suzuki S. Relationship between the pressure and diameter of the carotid artery in humans. Heart Vessels 15: 49-51, 2000.
58. Tambasco M, Steinman DA. Path-dependent hemodynamics of the stenosed carotid bifurcation. Anna Biomed Eng 31: 1054-1065, 2003.
59. Taylor CA, Draney MT. Experimental and computational methods in cardiovascular fluid mechanics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36: 197-231, 2004.
60. Taylor CA, Figueroa CA. Patient-specific modeling of cardiovascular mechanics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 11: 109-134, 2009.
61. Taylor CA, Humphrey JD. Open problems in computational vascular biomechanics: hemodynamics and arterial wall mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198: 3514-3523, 2009.
62. Tropea BI, Schwarzacher SP, Chang A. Reduction of aortic wall motion inhibits hypertension-mediated experimental atherosclerosis. Artherioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20: 2127-2133, 2000.
63. Vanmaele RG, Van Schil PE, DeMaeseneer MG, Meese G, Lehert P, Van Look RF. Division-endarterectomy-anastomosis of the internal carotid artery: a prospective randomized comparative study. Cardiovasc Surg 2: 573-581, 1994.
64. Vignon IE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for one-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure waves in arteries. Wave Motion 39: 361-374, 2004.
65. Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195: 3776-3796, 2006.
66. Wells DR, Archie JP, Kleinstreuer C. Effect of carotid artery geometry on the magnitude and distribution of wall shear stress gradients. J Vasc Surg 23: 667-678, 1996.
67. Younis HF, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Chan RC, Isasi AG, Hinton DP, Chau AH, Kim LA, Kamm RD. Hemodynamics and wall mechanics in human carotid bifurcation and its consequences for atherosclerosis: investigation of inter-individual variation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 3: 17-32, 2004.