Morphology induction from limited noisy data using approximate string matching

HLT-NAACL 2006 - SIGPHON 2006: 8th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Phonology, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 60-68

  Karagol Ayan, Burcu ^a   Doermann, David ^a   Weinberg, Amy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATE STRING MATCHING; DATA-DRIVEN METHODS; DISTANCE METRICS; EDIT DISTANCE; ELECTRONIC RESOURCES; HARD COPIES; LIMITED DATA; LONGEST COMMON SUBSTRING; NOISY DATA; NOVEL APPLICATIONS;

MORPHOLOGY;

EID: 84883307514     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Nart B. Atalay, Kemal Oflazer, and Bilge Say. 2003. The annotation process in the Turkish Treebank. In Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora-LINC, Budapest, Hungary, April.
2. Robert Avery, Serap Bezmez, Anna G. Edmonds, and Mehlika Yaylalı. 1974. Redhouse Ingilizce-Türkçe Sözlük. Redhouse Yayınevi.
3. Marco Baroni, Johannes Matiasek, and Harald Trost. 2002. Unsupervised discovery of morphologically related words based on orthographic and semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning, pages 48-57.
4. Michael R. Brent, Sreerama K. Murthy, and Andrew Lundberg. 1995. Discovering morphemic suffixes: A case study in minimum description length induction. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 28-36, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Michael R. Brent. 1993. Minimal generative models: A middle ground between neurons and triggers. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Ft. Laudersdale, FL.
6. Mathias Creutz and Krista Lagus. 2002. Unsupervised discovery of morphemes. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning.
7. H. Dejean. 1998. Morphemes as necessary concepts for structures: Discovery from untagged corpora. In Workshop on Paradigms and Grounding in Natural Language Learning, pages 295-299.
8. John Goldsmith, Yu Hu, Irina Matveeva, and Colin Sprague. 2005. A heuristic for morpheme discovery based on string edit distance. Technical Report TR-2205-04, Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago.
9. John Goldsmith. 2001. Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational Linguistics, 27(2):153-198.
10. Zellig Harris. 1955. From phoneme to morpheme. Language, 31:190-222.
11. Huanfeng Ma, Burcu Karagol-Ayan, David Doermann, Douglas Oard, and Jianqiang Wang. 2003. Parsing and tagging of bilingual dictionaries. Traitement Automatique Des Langues, pages 125-150.
12. Christian Monson. 2004. A framework for unsupervised natural language morphology induction. In Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop: ACL 2004, pages 67-72.
13. Sylvain Neuvel and Sean A. Fulop. 2002. Unsupervised learning of morphology without morphemes. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning, pages 31-40.
14. Kemal Oflazer, Bilge Say, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, and Gökhan Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish Treebank. In Anne Abeillé, editor, Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Patrick Schone and Daniel Jurafsky. 2001. Knowledge-free induction of inflectional morphologies. In Second Meeting of the NAACL, pages 183-191.
16. Ilya Segalovich. 2003. A fast morphological algorithm with unknown word guessing induced by a dictionary for a web search engine. In Proceedings of MLMTA, Las Vegas, NV.
17. P.H. Sellers. 1980. The theory and computation of evolutionary distances: pattern recognition. Journal of Algorithms, 1:359-373.
18. Matthew G. Snover and Michael R. Brent. 2001. A bayesian model for morpheme and paradigm identification. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 482-490.
19. Robert A. Wagner and Michael J. Fischer. 1974. The string-to-string correction problem. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 21(1):168-173.
20. Richard Wicentowski. 2004. Multilingual noise-robust supervised morphological analysis using the wordframe model. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology, pages 70-77, Barcelona, Spain.
21. John U. Wolff. 1972. A Dictionary of Cebuano Visaya. Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.