Stringent tests of constrained Minimal Flavor Violation through ΔF=2 transitions

European Physical Journal C

Volumn 73, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1-14

  Buras, Andrzej J ^a   Girrbach, Jennifer ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883292395     PISSN: 14346044     EISSN: 14346052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2560-1     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. A. J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager, L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model. Phys. Lett. B 500, 161-167 (2001). hep-ph/0007085.
2. A. J. Buras, Minimal flavor violation. Acta Phys. Pol. B 34, 5615-5668 (2003). hep-ph/0310208.
3. -. J. High Energy Phys. 10, 003 (2006). hep-ph/0604057.
4. s, d from constrained minimal flavour violation. J. High Energy Phys. 0705, 061 (2007). hep-ph/0610037.
5. d-mixing and in sin(2β) determinations. Phys. Lett. B 666, 162-165 (2008). arXiv: 0803. 4340.
6. A. J. Buras, D. Guadagnoli, Correlations among new CP violating effects in ΔF=2 observables. Phys. Rev. D 78, 033005 (2008). arXiv: 0805. 3887.
7. M. Bona et al. (UTfit Collaboration), An improved standard model prediction of BR(B→τν) and its implications for new physics. Phys. Lett. B 687, 61-69 (2010). arXiv: 0908. 3470.
8. A. Lenz, U. Nierste, J. Charles, S. Descotes-Genon, A. Jantsch et al., Anatomy of new physics in B - B̄ mixing. Phys. Rev. D 83, 036004 (2011). arXiv: 1008. 1593.
9. E. Lunghi, A. Soni, Possible evidence for the breakdown of the CKM-paradigm of CP-violation. Phys. Lett. B 697, 323-328 (2011). arXiv: 1010. 6069.
10. 3 flavour model. J. High Energy Phys. 1203, 088 (2012). arXiv: 1112. 4477.
11. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach, BSM models facing the recent LHCb data: a first look. Acta Phys. Pol. B 43, 1427 (2012). arXiv: 1204. 5064.
12. C. Davies, Standard model heavy flavor physics on the lattice. Proc. Sci. LATTICE2011, 019 (2011). arXiv: 1203. 3862.
13. E. Gámiz, Flavour physics from lattice QCD. Proc. Sci. ConfinementX, 241 (2012). arXiv: 1303. 3971.
14. K from 2+1 flavor domain wall QCD. Phys. Rev. D 84, 014503 (2011). arXiv: 1012. 4178.
15. f=2+1 unquenched QCD. Phys. Rev. D 82, 114509 (2010). arXiv: 1008. 5179.
16. f=2 twisted mass lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 83, 014505 (2011). arXiv: 1009. 5606.
17. G. Colangelo, S. Durr, A. Juttner, L. Lellouch, H. Leutwyler et al., Review of lattice results concerning low energy particle physics. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1695 (2011). arXiv: 1011. 4408.
18. 0 mixing. Proc. Sci. LATTICE2012, 107 (2012). arXiv: 1211. 1101.
19. S. Durr, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. Katz, S. Krieg et al., Precision computation of the kaon bag parameter. Phys. Lett. B 705, 477-481 (2011). arXiv: 1106. 3230.
20. J. Laiho, E. Lunghi, R. S. Van de Water, Lattice QCD inputs to the CKM unitarity triangle analysis. Phys. Rev. D 81, 034503 (2010). arXiv: 0910. 2928. Updates available on http://latticeaverages. org/.
21. B. D. Gaiser, T. Tsao, M. B. Wise, Parameters of the six quark model. Ann. Phys. 132, 66 (1981).
22. A. J. Buras, J.-M. Gérard, 1/N expansion for kaons. Nucl. Phys. B 264, 371 (1986).
23. W. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, J.-M. Gérard, The B parameter beyond the leading order of 1/N expansion. Phys. Lett. B 211, 343 (1988).
24. K). J. High Energy Phys. 1102, 075 (2011). arXiv: 1012. 2026.
25. M. Bona et al. (UTfit Collaboration), Model-independent constraints on ΔF=2 operators and the scale of new physics. J. High Energy Phys. 0803, 049 (2008). arXiv: 0707. 0636. Updates available on http://www. utfit. org.
26. 3 models. J. High Energy Phys. 1301, 007 (2013). arXiv: 1206. 3878.
27. A. J. Buras, F. De Fazio, J. Girrbach, M. V. Carlucci, The anatomy of quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era. J. High Energy Phys. 1302, 023 (2013). arXiv: 1211. 1237.
28. A. J. Buras, F. De Fazio, J. Girrbach, The anatomy of Z′ and Z with flavour changing neutral currents in the flavour precision era. J. High Energy Phys. 1302, 116 (2013). arXiv: 1211. 1896.
29. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach, R. Ziegler, Particle-antiparticle mixing, CP violation and rare K and B decays in a minimal theory of fermion masses. J. High Energy Phys. 1304, 168 (2013). arXiv: 1301. 5498.
30. - time-dependent rate. J. High Energy Phys. 1307, 77 (2013). arXiv: 1303. 3820.
31. A. J. Buras, F. De Fazio, J. Girrbach, R. Knegjens, M. Nagai, The anatomy of neutral scalars with FCNCs in the flavour precision era. J. High Energy Phys. 1306, 111 (2013). arXiv: 1303. 3723.
32. S. H. Kettell, L. Landsberg, H. H. Nguyen, Alternative technique for standard model estimation of the rare kaon decay branchings BR(K → π ν ν̄) (SM). Phys. At. Nucl. 67, 1398-1407 (2004). hep-ph/0212321.
33. A. J. Buras, F. Parodi, A. Stocchi, The CKM matrix and the unitarity triangle: another look. J. High Energy Phys. 0301, 029 (2003). hep-ph/0207101.
34. K beyond lowest order in the operator product expansion. Phys. Lett. B 688, 309-313 (2010). arXiv: 1002. 3612.
35. qγ in the left-right asymmetric model: Higgs particles striking back. J. High Energy Phys. 1203, 024 (2012). arXiv: 1111. 5014.
36. R. Dowdall, C. Davies, R. Horgan, C. Monahan, J. Shigemitsu, B-meson decay constants from improved lattice NRQCD and physical u, d, s and c sea quarks. arXiv: 1302. 2644.
37. K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics. J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010).
38. J. Beringer et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics (RPP). Phys. Rev. D 86, 010001 (2012).
39. K. Chetyrkin, J. Kuhn, A. Maier, P. Maierhofer, P. Marquard et al., Charm and bottom quark masses: an update. Phys. Rev. D 80, 074010 (2009). arXiv: 0907. 2110.
40. I. Allison et al. (HPQCD Collaboration), High-precision charm-quark mass from current-current correlators in lattice and continuum QCD. Phys. Rev. D 78, 054513 (2008). arXiv: 0805. 2999.
41. 0 mixing in the presence of a heavy top quark. Nucl. Phys. B 347, 491-536 (1990).
42. 0 mixing with an extended Higgs sector. Nucl. Phys. B 523, 40-58 (1998). hep-ph/9710245.
43. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration, D0 Collaboration), Combination of the top-quark mass measurements from the Tevatron collider. Phys. Rev. D 86, 092003 (2012). arXiv: 1207. 1069.
44. Y. Amhis et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group Collaboration), Averages of B-hadron, C-hadron, and tau-lepton properties as of early 2012. arXiv: 1207. 1158.
45. - decays. arXiv: 1304. 2600.
46. s system at LHCb. arXiv: 1212. 4140.
47. K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 121801 (2012). arXiv: 1108. 2036.
48. K at next-to-next-to-leading order: the charm-top-quark contribution. Phys. Rev. D 82, 094026 (2010). arXiv: 1007. 0684.
49. C. Tarantino, Flavor lattice QCD in the precision era. arXiv: 1210. 0474.
50. ± decays including first results on 2012 data. Linked to LHCb-ANA-2013-012.
51. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the CKM angle gamma from a combination of B→Dh analyses. arXiv: 1305. 2050.
52. -. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1532 (2011). arXiv: 1011. 1096.
53. G. 't Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong interactions. Nucl. Phys. B 72, 461 (1974).
54. G. 't Hooft, A two-dimensional model for mesons. Nucl. Phys. B 75, 461 (1974).
55. E. Witten, Baryons in the 1/n expansion. Nucl. Phys. B 160, 57 (1979).
56. W. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, J.-M. Gérard, The ΔI=1/2 rule in the large N limit. Phys. Lett. B 180, 133 (1986).
57. W. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, J.-M. Gérard, The K→ππ decays in the large N limit: quark evolution. Nucl. Phys. B 293, 787 (1987).
58. W. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, J.-M. Gérard, A consistent analysis of the ΔI=1/2 rule for K decays. Phys. Lett. B 192, 138 (1987).
59. 2. arXiv: 1206. 5142.
60. P. Boyle et al. (RBC Collaboration, UKQCD Collaboration), Emerging understanding of the ΔI=1/2 rule from lattice QCD. arXiv: 1212. 1474.
61. S mass difference. Phys. Lett. B 257, 191-195 (1991).
62. J.-M. Gérard, Electroweak interactions of hadrons. Acta Phys. Pol. B 21, 257-305 (1990).
63. S mass difference. Phys. Lett. B 135, 481 (1984).
64. J.-M. Gérard, C. Smith, S. Trine, Radiative kaon decays and the penguin contribution to the ΔI=1/2 rule. Nucl. Phys. B 730, 1-36 (2005). hep-ph/0508189.
65. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach, Towards the identification of new physics through quark flavour violating processes. arXiv: 1306. 3775.
66. S mass difference. arXiv: 1212. 5931.
67. R. S. Chivukula, H. Georgi, Composite technicolor standard model. Phys. Lett. B 188, 99 (1987).
68. L. J. Hall, L. Randall, Weak scale effective supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2939-2942 (1990).
69. G. D'Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Strumia, Minimal flavour violation: an effective field theory approach. Nucl. Phys. B 645, 155-187 (2002). hep-ph/0207036.
70. - in supersymmetry at large tanβ. Phys. Lett. B 546, 96-107 (2002). hep-ph/0207241.
71. A. J. Buras, M. V. Carlucci, S. Gori, G. Isidori, Higgs-mediated FCNCs: natural flavour conservation vs. minimal flavour violation. J. High Energy Phys. 1010, 009 (2010). arXiv: 1005. 5310.
72. s, d mixing in two Higgs doublet models with MFV. Phys. Lett. B 694, 402-409 (2011). arXiv: 1007. 5291.
73. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, J. Jones-Perez, P. Lodone, D. M. Straub, U(2) and minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1725 (2011). arXiv: 1105. 2296.
74. 3 flavour symmetry. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1812 (2011). arXiv: 1108. 5125.
75. 3 symmetry. J. High Energy Phys. 1207, 181 (2012). arXiv: 1203. 4218.
76. R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala, D. M. Straub, Less minimal flavour violation. J. High Energy Phys. 1210, 040 (2012). arXiv: 1206. 1327.
77. 3 flavor symmetry. Proc. Sci. EPS-HEP2011, 145 (2011). arXiv: 1111. 0246.
78. A. Crivellin, L. Hofer, U. Nierste, D. Scherer, Phenomenological consequences of radiative flavor violation in the MSSM. Phys. Rev. D 84, 035030 (2011). arXiv: 1105. 2818.
79. A. Crivellin, U. Nierste, Supersymmetric renormalisation of the CKM matrix and new constraints on the squark mass matrices. Phys. Rev. D 79, 035018 (2009). arXiv: 0810. 1613.
80. A. L. Kagan, G. Perez, T. Volansky, J. Zupan, General minimal flavor violation. Phys. Rev. D 80, 076002 (2009). arXiv: 0903. 1794.