The global stock of research evidence relevant to health systems policymaking

Health Research Policy and Systems

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Wilson, Michael G ^a,b,c   Moat, Kaelan A ^c   Lavis, John N ^a,b,c,d  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HEALTH AUXILIARY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; POVERTY; RESEARCH;

EID: 84883284046     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14784505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-32     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Lavis JN, Davies HTO, Oxman AD, Denis J-L, Golden-Biddle K, Ferlie E. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005, 10(Suppl. 1):35-48.
2. Lavis JN, Posada FB, Haines A, Osei E. Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet 2004, 364:1615-1621. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17317-0, 15519634.
3. Lavis JN, Davies HTO, Gruen RL. Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers. Healthcare Policy 2006, 1:21-33. 2585348, 19305677.
4. Egger M, Smith GD, O'Rourke K. Rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context 2001, 3-19. ondon: BMJ Books: 2nd edition. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (Eds.).
5. Lavis JN. How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking?. PLoS Medicine 2009, 6(11):e1000141. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000141, 2777391, 19936223.
6. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB, for the Hedges Team Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ 2004, 330:68. 543864, 15619601, for the Hedges Team.
7. Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. for the Hedges Team: EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:29-33. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.04.001, 17161751.
8. Dobbins M, DeCorby K, Robeson P, Husson H, Tirilis D, Greco L. A knowledge management tool for public health: health-evidence.ca. BMC Publ, Health 2010, 10:496.
9. McMaster Health Forum Health Systems Evidence 2013, [http://www.healthsystemsevidence.org/] Accessed 15th Aug 2013, McMaster Health Forum.
10. Moat KA, Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Røttingen J-A, Bärnighausen T. Twelve myths about systematic reviews for health system policymaking. J Health Serv Res Policy 2013, 18(1):44-50. 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011175, 23393042.
11. Rockers PC, Feigl A, Røttingen J-A, Fretheim A, De Ferranti D, Lavis JN, Melberg HO, Bärnighausen T. Study-design selection criteria in systematic reviews of effectiveness of health systems interventions and reforms: A meta-review. Health Policy 2012, 104:206-214. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.12.007, 22325150.
12. Moat KA, Lavis JN. Supporting the use of Cochrane Reviews in health policy and management decision-making: Health Systems Evidence [editorial]. The Cochrane Library 2011, 8:ED000019.
13. Shea B, Grimshaw J, Wells G, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM. Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007, 7:10. 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10, 1810543, 17302989.
14. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 2013, C, [http://www.cochrane-handbook.org] Accessed 29th January 2013.
15. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination PROSPERO 2013, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, [http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/] Accessed 15th Aug 2013, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA group: preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009, 6:e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 2707599, 19621072.
17. Lavis JN, Røttingen J-A, Bosch-Capblanch X, Atun RA, El-Jardali F, Gilson L, Lewin S, Oliver S, Ongolo-Zogo P, Haines A. Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: Linking guidance development to policy development. PLoS Medicine 2012, 9(3):e1001186. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001186, 3302830, 22427746.
18. Bosch-Capblanch X, Lavis JN, Lewin S, Atun R, Røttingen J-A, Dröschel D, Beck L, Abalos E, El-Jardali F, Gilson L, Oliver S, Wyss K, Tugwell P, Kulier R, Pang T, Haines A. Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development. PLoS Med 2012, 9(3):e1001185. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001185, 3295823, 22412356.
19. Lewin S, Bosch-Capblanch X, Oliver S, Akl EA, Vist GE, Lavis JN, Ghersi D, Røttingen JA, Steinmann P, Gulmezoglu M, Tugwell P, El-Jardali F, Haines A. Guidance for Evidence-Informed Policies about Health Systems: Assessing How Much Confidence to Place in the Research Evidence. PLoS Med 2012, 9(3):e1001187. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001187, 3308931, 22448147.