Patient-reporting improves estimates of postoperative complication rates: A prospective cohort study in gynaecological oncology

British Journal of Cancer

Volumn 109, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 623-632

  Iyer, R ^a   Gentry Maharaj, A ^a   Nordin, A ^b   Liston, R ^c   Burnell, M ^a   Das, N ^c   Desai, R ^a   Gornall, R ^d   Beardmore Gray, A ^a   Hillaby, K ^d   Leeson, S ^e   Linder, A ^f   Lopes, A ^c   Meechan, D ^g   Mould, T ^h   Nevin, J ⁱ   Olaitan, A ^h   Rufford, B ^f   Ryan, A ^a   Shanbhag, S ^j   Thackeray, A ^g   Wood, N ^k   Reynolds, K ^l   Menon, U ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Portland House   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL CORNWALL HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d CHELTENHAM GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e BETSI CADWALADR UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD   (United Kingdom)

^f IPSWICH HOSPITAL NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^g Trent Cancer Registry   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^j GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^k ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^l ST BARTHOLOMEW S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSCESS; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BLADDER DISEASE; CANCER SURGERY; CHEST INFECTION; CYSTIC LYMPHANGIOMA; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; ENTEROPATHY; FEMALE; FISTULA; GYNECOLOGIC CANCER; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEART DISEASE; HEMATOMA; HERNIA; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; INTESTINE PERFORATION; LUNG EMBOLISM; LYMPHEDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; MENTAL DISEASE; MORBIDITY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REOPERATION; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND COMPLICATION;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84883282497     PISSN: 00070920     EISSN: 15321827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.366     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Alazzawi S, Bardakos NV, Hadfield SG, Butt U, Beer ZH, Field RE (2012) Patient-reported complications after elective joint replacement surgery: are they correct? J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B(8): 1120.
2. Andikyan V, Rezk Y, Einstein MH, Gualtiere G, Leitao Jr MM, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR, Basch EM, Chi DS (2012) A prospective study of the feasibility and acceptability of a Web-based, electronic patient-reported outcome system in assessing patient recovery after major gynecologic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 127(2): 273-277.
3. Bridgewater B (2010) Cardiac registers: the adult cardiac surgery register. Heart 96(18): 1441-1443.
4. Cockbain AJ, Carolan M, Berridge D, Toogood GJ (2012) Performance and Quality Indicators: The importance of accurate coding. Bull Royal College Surg Engl 94(2): 46-50.
5. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications-A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2): 205-213.
6. Dushey CH, Bornstein LJ, Alexiades MM, Westrich GH (2011) Short-term coagulation complications following total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of patient-reported and surgeon-verified complication rates. J Arthroplasty 26(8): 1338-1342.
7. Fowler FJ, Barry MJ, Lu Yao G, Roman A, Wasson J, Wennberg JE (1993) Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The National Medicare Experience: 1988-1990 (updated June 1993). Urology 42(6): 622-629.
8. Greenbaum J, Bornstein L, Lyman S, Alexiades M, Westrich G (2012) The validity of self-report as a technique for measuring short-term complications after total hip arthroplasty in a joint replacement registry. J Arthroplasty 27(7): 1310.
9. Grosse Frie K, van der Meulen J, Black N (2012) Relationship between patients' reports of complications and symptoms, disability and quality of life after surgery. Br J Surg 99(8): 1156.
10. Guldberg R, Kesmodel U, Hansen J, Gradel K, Brostrøm S, Kærlev L, Nørgård B (2012) Patient-reported outcome measures in women undergoing surgery for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Denmark, 2006-2011. Int Urogynecol J 0937-3462: 1-8.
11. Howell D, Fitch M, Bakker D, Green E, Sussman J, Mayo S, Mohammed S, Lee C, Doran D (2013) Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in cancer (PROMS-Cancer Core) for routine care: a scoping review and Canadian Delphi Consensus. Value Health 16(1): 76.
12. McHorney CA (1997) Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med 127(8 Pt 2): 743.
13. RCOG (2012) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Gynaecology (Scientific Impact Paper 31) RCOG, http://www.rcog.org.uk/womenshealth/clinical-guidance/ patient-reported-outcome-measuresgynaecology-sac-opinion-paper-31.
14. Sokol D, Wilson J (2008) What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 32(6): 942-944.