Fine-Grain Interoperability of Scientific Workflows in Distributed Computing Infrastructures

Journal of Grid Computing

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 429-455

  Plankensteiner, Kassian ^a   Prodan, Radu ^a   Janetschek, Matthias ^a   Fahringer, Thomas ^a   Montagnat, Johan ^b   Rogers, David ^c   Harvey, Ian ^c   Taylor, Ian ^c   Balaskó, Ákos ^d   Kacsuk, Péter ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d INSTITUTE FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE AND CONTROL   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Distributed computing; Grid computing; Intermediate representation; Interoperability; Portability; Scientific workflow

Indexed keywords

COMPUTING INFRASTRUCTURES; INTERMEDIATE REPRESENTATIONS; LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOW MANAGEMENTS; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS; TASK REPRESENTATION; WORKFLOW APPLICATIONS;

BRIDGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PORTABILITY; CONCRETE AGGREGATES; CONCRETES; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; GRID COMPUTING; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 84883275889     PISSN: 15707873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10723-013-9261-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Open Archives Initiative Object Reuse and Exchange (OAI-ORE). http://www. openarchives. org/ore/. Accessed 30 May 2013.
2. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www. w3. org/RDF/. Accessed 30 May 2013.
3. Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). http://www. w3. org/TR/skos-reference/ (2009).
4. SHIWA: SHaring Interoperable Workflows for large-scale scientific simulation on Available DCIs. http://www. shiwa-workflow. eu (2011).
5. Anjomshoaa, A., Brisard, F., Drescher, M., Fellows, D., Ly, A., McGough, S., Pulsipher, D., Savva, A.: Job Submission Description Language (JSDL) Specification, Version 1. 0. Technical report, Global Grid Forum (2005).
6. Berglund, A., Boag, S., Chamberlin, D., Fernández, M. F., Kay, M., Robie, J., Siméon, J.: XML Path Language (XPath) 2. 0 (W3C Recommendation). Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium (2007).
7. Chinnici, R., Moreau, J. J., Ryman, A., Weerawarana, S.: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2. 0 Part 1: Core Language. W3C Recommendation, 26. http://www. w3. org/TR/wsdl20/ (2007).
8. Clark, J., DeRose, S.: XML Path Language (XPath) 1. 0 (W3C Recommendation). Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium (1999).
9. Deelman, E., Singh, G., Su, M. H., Blythe, J., Gil, Y., Kesselman, C., Mehta, G., Vahi, K., Berriman, G. B., Good, J., et al.: Pegasus: a framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems. Sci. Program. 13(3), 219-237 (2005).
10. DeRemer, F., Kron, H. H.: Programming-in-the-large versus programming-in-the-small. In: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, No. 2, pp. 80-86. IEEE (1976).
11. Dobrusky, W. B., Steel, T. B.: Universal computer-oriented language. Commun. ACM 4, 138 (1961).
12. Elmroth, E., Hernández, F., Tordsson, J.: Three Fundamental Dimensions of Scientific Workflow Interoperability: Model of Computation, Language, and Execution Environment, vol. 26, pp. 245-256. Elsevier (2010).
13. Fahringer, T., Prodan, R., et al.: ASKALON: A Development and Grid Computing Environment for Scientific Workflows, chapter Frameworks and Tools: Workflow Generation, Refinement and Execution. Workflows for e-Science. Springer (2007).
14. Glatard, T., Montagnat, J., Lingrand, D., Pennec, X.: Flexible and efficient workflow deployment of data-intensive applications on grids with moteur. Int. J. High. Perform. Comput. Appl. 22(3), 347-360 (2008).
15. Harrison, A., Rogers, D., Taylor, I.: SHIWA Desktop. SHIWA Deliverable D5. 2 (2010).
16. Jordan, D., Evdemon, J., Alves, A., Arkin, A., Askary, S., Barreto, C., Bloch, B., Curbera, F., Ford, M., Goland, Y., et al.: Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2. 0. OASIS Standard, 11. http://docs. oasis-open. org/wsbpel/2. 0/OS/wsbpel-v2. 0-OS. html (2007).
17. Kacsuk, P.: P-GRADE portal family for grid infrastructures. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper. 23(3), 235-245 (2011).
18. TMVirtual Machine Specification, Java SE 7th edn. Technical report, Oracle America, Inc. (2011).
19. Merrill, J.: GENERIC and GIMPLE: A new tree representation for entire functions. In: Proceedings of the 2003 GCC Developers' Summit, pp. 171-179 (2003).
20. Missier, P., Turi, D., Goble, C., et al.: Taverna workflows: Syntax and semantics. In: IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (2007).
21. Model, B. P.: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Version 2. 0. OMG Specification, Object Management Group. http://www. omg. org/spec/BPMN/2. 0/ (2011).
22. Montagnat, J., Isnard, B., Glatard, T., Maheshwari, K., Fornarino, M. B.: A data-driven workflow language for grids based on array programming principles. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, WORKS'09, pp. 7: 1-7: 10. New York, NY, USA, ACM (2009).
23. Nitzsche, J., VanLessen, T., Karastoyanova, D., Leymann, F.: BPEL light. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM 2007, Brisbane, Australia, September 24-28, 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 214-229. Springer (2007). ISBN: 978-3-540-75183-0.
24. Plankensteiner, K., Prodan, R., Fahringer, T., Montagnat, J., Cerezo, N., Rogers, D., Harvey, I., Balasko, A., et al.: Fine-grained interoperability architecture and case studies. SHIWA Deliverable D6. 2 (2012).
25. Plankensteiner, K., Prodan, R., Fahringer, T., Montagnat, J., et al.: Interoperable workflow intermediate representation. SHIWA Deliverable D6. 1 (2010).
26. Tan, W., Missier, P., Foster, I., Madduri, R., DeRoure, D., Goble, C.: A Comparison of Using Taverna and BPEL in Building Scientific Workflows: the case of caGrid. In: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 22, pp. 1098-1117. Wiley Online Library (2009). ISSN: 1532-0634.
27. Taylor, I., Shields, M., Wang, I., Rana, R.: Triana applications within Grid computing and peer to peer environments. J. Grid Computing 1(2), 199-217 (2003).
28. Wells, P. D.: A universal intermediate representation for massively parallel software development. SIGPLAN Not. 39(5), 48-57 (2004).
29. W. P. D. I. X. M. L. WfMC. Process Definition Language (XPDL), WfMC Standards. Technical report, WFMC-TC-1025, http://www. wfmc. org/xpdl. html (2001).