Evaluation of false positive responses by mass spectrometry and ion mobility spectrometry for the detection of trace explosives in complex samples

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volumn 795, Issue , 2013, Pages 36-43

  Crawford, C L ^a   Hill, H H ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interferences; Ion mobility spectrometry; Mass spectrometry; Personal care products; Secondary electrospray ionization source

Indexed keywords

FALSE POSITIVE RATES; FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY; FOOD INGREDIENTS; HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS; INTERFERENCES; ION MOBILITY SPECTROMETRY; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; SECONDARY ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATIONS;

ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION; EXPLOSIVES; ION MOBILITY SPECTROMETERS; IONS; ISOTOPES; MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EXPLOSIVES DETECTION;

DOMESTIC CHEMICAL; EXPLOSIVE;

ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HALOGENATION; ION MOBILITY SPECTROMETRY; IONIZATION; ISOTOPE ANALYSIS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PHASE SEPARATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; ULTRA PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;

EID: 84883245799     PISSN: 00032670     EISSN: 18734324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.07.070     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Eiceman G., Karpas Z. Ion Mobility Spectrometry 2005, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 2nd ed.
2. National Research Council Opportunities to Improve Airport Passenger Screening with Mass Spectrometry 2004, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
3. Busch K.L. Chemical noise in mass spectrometry. Spectroscopy 2011, 17(10):32-37.
4. John H., Worek F., Thiermann H. LC-MS-based procedures for monitoring of toxic organophosphorus compounds and verification of pesticide and nerve agent poisoning. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391:97-116.
5. Haigh T.A. Chemical warfare agents and their hydrolysis products from the US EPA standardized analytical methods and GC-MS analytical method for the analysis of chemical warfare agent degradation products listed in the EPA standardized analytical methods. NEMC Conference 2007.
6. Scarlatos A., et al. Methods for detecting botulinum toxin with applicability to screening foods against biological terrorist attacks. J. Food Sci. 2005, 70(8):R121-R130.
7. Stout P.R., et al. A comparison of the validity of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urine samples for morphine, codeine, 6-acetylmorphine, and benzoylecgonine. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2009, 33(8):p398.
8. Meyer M.R., Maurer H.H. Current status of hyphenated mass spectrometry in studies of the metabolism of drugs of abuse, including doping agents. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 402(1):195-208.
9. Sigman M.E., Ma C.-Y. Detection limits for GC/MS analysis of organic explosives. J. Forensic Sci. 2001, 46(1):6-11.
10. Yinon J. Analysis of explosives by LC/MS. Advances in Forensic Applications of Mass Spectrometry 2004, 231-274. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL.
11. Collin O.L., Zimmermann C.M., Jackson G.P. Fast gas chromatography negative chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry of explosive compounds using dynamic collision-induced dissociation. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 279:93-99.
12. Guo X., Bruins A.P., Covey T.R. Characterization of typical chemical background interferences in atmospheric pressure ionization liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20:3145-3150.
13. Lei Z., Huhman D.V., Sumner L.W. Mass spectrometry strategies in metabolomics. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286(29):25433-25442.
14. Svatos A. Single-cell metabolomics comes of age: new developments in mass spectrometry profiling and imaging. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83:5037-5044.
15. Richardson S.D. Environmental mass spectrometry: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84:747-778.
16. Janata J. Role of analytical chemistry in defense strategies against chemical and biological attack. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2009, 2:321-331.
17. Mason E.A., Schamp H.W. Mobility of gaseous ions in weak electric fields. Ann. Phys. 1958, 4(3):233-270.
18. Karasek F.W., Denney D.W. Detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene vapours in air by plasma chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1974, 93:141-147.
19. Karasek F.W., Hill J.H.H., Kim S.H. Plasma chromatography of heroin and cocaine. J. Chromatogr. A 1976, 117(2):327-336.
20. FAA, U.S. The Federal Aviation Administration: A Historical Perspective, 1903-2008 2008, FAA.
21. Eiceman G.A., Stone J.A. Ion mobility spectrometers in national defense. Anal. Chem. 2004, 390A-397A.
22. Finn K. Beauty and personal care products industry overview. Consumer Product Guides 2012, Business.com.
23. EWG Skin Deep Cosmetics Database 2012, Environmental Working Group.
24. Kanu A.B., Wu C., Hill H.H. Rapid preseparation of interferences for ion mobility spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 610:125-134.
25. Daum K.A., et al. Resolving interferences in negative mode ion mobility spectrometry using selective reactant ion chemistry. Talanta 2001, 54:299-306.
26. Matz L.M., Tornatore P.S., Hill H.H. Evaluation of suspected interferents for TNT detection by ion mobility spectrometry. Talanta 2001, 54:171-179.
27. Hoffmann E.d., Stroobant V. Mass Spectrometry: Principles and Applications 2007, Wiley, West Sussex, England. 3rd ed.
28. Peng Y., Austin D.E. New approaches to miniaturizing ion trap mass analyzers. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2011, 30(10):1560-1567.
29. Crawford C.L., et al. Analysis of black powder by ion mobility-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82(1):387-393.
30. Steiner W.E., et al. Secondary ionization of chemical warfare agent simulants: atmospheric pressure ion mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:6068-6076.
31. Steiner W.E., et al. Electrospray ionization with ambient pressure ion mobility separation and mass analysis by orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 15:2221-2226.
32. Tam M., Herbert J., Hill H. Secondary electrospray ionization-ion mobility spectrometry for explosive vapor detection. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:2741-2747.
33. Ping Y., Austin D.A. New approaches to miniaturizing ion trap mass analyzers. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2011, 30(10):1560-1567.
34. Dwivedi P., et al. Metabolic profiling by ion mobility mass spectrometry (IMMS). Metabolomics 2008, 4:63-80.
35. Kaplan K., et al. Monitoring dynamic changes in lymph metabolome of fasting and fed rats by electrospray ionization-ion mobility mass spectrometry (ESI-IMMS). Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:7944-7953.
36. Barnes-Srebalus C.A., et al. Resolving Isomeric peptide mixtures: a combined HPLC/ion mobility-TOFMS analysis of a 4000-component combinatorial library. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74:26-36.
37. Nurmi J., Pellinen J. Multiresidue method for the analysis of emerging contaminants in wastewater by ultra performance liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:6712-6719.
38. Ewing R.G., et al. A critical review of ion mobility spectrometry for the detection of explosives and explosive related compounds. Talanta 2001, 54:515-529.
39. Nurmi J., Pellinen J., Rantalainen A.-L. Critical evaluation of screening techniques for emerging environmental contaminants based on accurate mass measurements with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 47(3):303-312.
40. Thiesan, L., et al., Survey of Commercially Available Explosives Detection Technologies and Equipment 2004. 2004, The National Law Enforcement and Correction Technology Center.
41. de Perre C., Prado A., McCord B.R. Rapid and specific detection of urea nitrate and ammonium nitrate by electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry using infusion with crown ethers. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 26:154-162.
42. Kind T., Fiehn O. Metabolomic database annotations via query of elemental compositions: mass accuracy is insufficient even at less than 1ppm. BMC Info. 2006, 7(234).
43. Kind T., Fiehn O. Seven golden rules for heuristic filtering of molecular formulas obtained by accurate mass spectrometry. BMC Info. 2007, 8.(105).