Validation of a risk stratification index and risk quantification index for predicting patient outcomes: In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, and length-of-stay

Anesthesiology

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 525-540

  Sigakis, Matthew J G ^a   Bittner, Edward A ^a   Wanderer, Jonathan P ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CALIBRATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRENT PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; RISK STRATIFICATION INDEX; VALIDATION STUDY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; MIDDLE AGED; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CALIBRATION; DATA COLLECTION; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AREA UNDER CURVE; RISK; ROC CURVE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84883230495     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: 15281175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829ce6e6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373-83 (Pubitemid 17055592)
2. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA: Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 613-9
3. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG: Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1075-9; discussion 1081-90
4. van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, Quan H, Forster AJ: A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care 2009; 47: 626-33
5. van Walraven C, Wong J, Bennett C, Forster AJ: The Procedural Index for Mortality Risk (PIMR): An index calculated using administrative data to quantify the independent influence of procedures on risk of hospital death. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11:258
6. Sessler DI, Sigl JC, Manberg PJ, Kelley SD, Schubert A, Chamoun NG: Broadly applicable risk stratification system for predicting duration of hospitalization and mortality. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1026-37
7. Cohen NA, Hannenberg AA: Risk stratification index: An important advance in comparing health care apples to oranges. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1004-6
8. Pace NL: Incomplete validation of risk stratification indices. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 214-5; author reply 215-6
9. Harrell FE: Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York, Springer-Verlag, 2001, pp 493-4
10. Sigl JC, Sessler DI, Kelley SD, Chamoun NG: Incomplete Validation of Risk Stratification Indices. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 215-6
11. Dalton JE, Kurz A, Turan A, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI, Saager L: Development and validation of a risk quantification index for 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in noncardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 1336-44
12. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: User Guide for the 2010 Participant Use Data File. Chicago, American College of Surgeons, 2010
13. Murphy SN, Chueh HC: A security architecture for query tools used to access large biomedical databases. Proc AMIA Symp 2002; 552-6
14. Murphy SN, Gainer V, Chueh HC: A visual interface designed for novice users to find research patient cohorts in a large biomedical database. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003;489-93
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics: National Death Index, Matching Criteria. Hyattsville, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011
16. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, Gerds T, Gonen M, Obuchowski N, Pencina MJ, Kattan MW: Assessing the performance of prediction models: A framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 128-38
17. Department of Health and Human Services: 45 CFR Part 162, Proposed Rules. Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 74, 2012
18. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP): Clinical Classifications Software 2012. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project- HCUP a Federal-State-Industry Partnership in Health Data, 2011
19. Cook NR: Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation 2007; 115: 928-35 (Pubitemid 46294733)
20. Brier GW: Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review 1950; 78: 1-3
21. Reistetter TA, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Markello SJ, Granger CV, Ottenbacher KJ: Diabetes comorbidity and age influence rehabilitation outcomes after hip fracture. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1375-7
22. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, Sugarbaker DJ, Donaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KK, Ludwig LE, Pedan A, Goldman L: Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999; 100: 1043-9 (Pubitemid 29416229)
23. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krogstad D, Murray B, Burke DS, O'Malley TA, Goroll AH, Caplan CH, Nolan J, Carabello B, Slater EE: Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 1977; 297: 845-50 (Pubitemid 8200494)
24. Goldman L: The revised cardiac risk index delivers what it promised. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 57-8
25. Raval MV, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Hamilton BH, Ko CY, Hall BL: Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: Incorporation of a novel procedure risk score. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211: 715-23
26. American Medical Association: Current Procedural Terminology, Standard Edition. Chicago, American Medical Association Press, 2005
27. American Medical Association: Current Procedural Terminology, Standard Edition. Chicago, American Medical Association Press, 2006
28. American Medical Association: Current Procedural Terminology, Standard Edition. Chicago, American Medical Association Press, 2007
29. American Medical Association: Current Procedural Terminology, Standard Edition. Chicago, American Medical Association Press, 2008
30. American Medical Association: Current Procedural Terminology, Standard Edition. Chicago, American Medical Association Press, 2009
31. American Medical Association: Current Procedural Terminology, Standard Edition. Chicago, American Medical Association Press, 2010
32. American Medical Association: Current Procedural Terminology, Standard Edition. Chicago, American Medical Association Press, 2011
33. Saklad M: Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 1941; 2: 281-4
34. American Society of Anesthesiologists: New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963; 24:111
35. Haynes SR, Lawler PG: An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 195-9
36. Aronson WL, McAuliffe MS, Miller K: Variability in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification Scale. AANA J 2003; 71: 265-74 (Pubitemid 36993453)
37. O'Malley KJ, Cook KF, Price MD, Wildes KR, Hurdle JF, Ashton CM: Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. Health Serv Res 2005; 40(5 Pt 2): 1620-39 (Pubitemid 41434351)
38. Green J, Wintfeld N: How accurate are hospital discharge data for evaluating effectiveness of care? Med Care 1993; 31: 719-31
39. Lloyd SS, Rissing JP: Physician and coding errors in patient records. JAMA 1985; 254: 1330-6 (Pubitemid 15236606)
40. Hsia DC, Krushat WM, Fagan AB, Tebbutt JA, Kusserow RP: Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 352-5 (Pubitemid 18044164)
41. Goldstein LB: Accuracy of ICD-9-CM coding for the identification of patients with acute ischemic stroke: Effect of modifier codes. Stroke 1998; 29: 1602-4 (Pubitemid 28365581)