The impact of recombination on short-term selection gain in plant breeding experiments

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 126, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2299-2312

  McClosky, Benjamin ^a   Tanksley, Steven D ^a  

^a Nature Source Genetics Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN VARIABLES; FAVORABLE INTERACTIONS; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATIONS; POPULATION SIZES; RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION; RESPONSE TO SELECTION; SELECTION INTENSITY; SELECTION PRESSURES;

CHROMOSOMES; EXPERIMENTS; POPULATION STATISTICS;

AGRICULTURE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS BREEDING; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; PLANT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKERS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANTS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84883218370     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2136-3     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Albrecht T, Wimmer V, Auinger H, Erbe M, Knaak C, Ouzunova M, et al (2011) Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theor Appl Genet 123: 339-350.
2. Allard R (1999) Principles of plant breeding, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
3. Bernardo R (1996) Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci 36: 50-56.
4. 2 plants? Theor Appl Genet 119: 255-262.
5. Bjornstad A (1987) The role of linkage and pleiotropy in doubled haploid lines from a barley cross. Hereditas 106: 155-168.
6. 1-family variation for testcross performance in a maize population. Euphytica 154: 41-51.
7. Bourguet D, Gair J, Mattice M, Whitlock M (2003) Genetic recombination and adaptation to fluctuating environments: selection for geotaxis in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 91: 78-84.
8. Brachi B, Faure N, Horton M, Flahauw E, Vazquez A et al (2010) Linkage and association mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time in nature. PLoS Genet 6: e1000940. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pgen. 1000940.
9. Buckler E et al (2009) The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325: 714-718.
10. Bulmer M (1980) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
11. Charmet G, Branlard G (1985) A comparison of androgenetic doubled-haploid and single seed descent lines in triticale. Theor Appl Genet 71: 193-200.
12. Choo T, Reinbergs E, Park S (1982) Comparison of frequency distributions of doubled haploid and single seed descent lines in barley. Theor Appl Genet 61: 215-218.
13. Courtois B (1993) Comparison of single seed descent and anther culture-derived lines of three single crosses of rice. Theor Appl Genet 85: 625-631.
14. Darvasi A, Soller M (1995) Advanced intercross lines, an experimental population for fine genetic mapping. Genetics 141: 1199-1207.
15. Falconer D, Mackay T (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Harlow.
16. Felsenstein J (1974) The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78: 737-756.
17. Felsenstein J (1988) Sex and the evolution of recombination. In: Michod RE, Levin BR (eds) The evolution of sex: an examination of current ideas. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 74-86.
18. Fisher R (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univeristy Press, Oxford.
19. Fisher R (1954) A fuller theory of junctions in inbreeding. Heredity 8: 187-197.
20. Funk D (2006) Major advances in globalization and consolidation of the artificial insemination industry. J Dairy Sci 89: 1362-1368.
21. Gorlov I, Schuler L, Bunger L, Borodin P (1992) Chiasma frequency in strains of mice selected for litter size and for high body weight. Theor Appl Genet 84: 640-642.
22. Hallauer A, Miranda J (1988) Qunatitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Iowa.
23. Hill W, Robertson A (1966) The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res 8: 269-294.
24. Hill W, Robertson A (1968) Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. TAG 38: 226-231.
25. Holland J (2004) Breeding: incorporation of exotic germplasm. In: Encyclopedia of plant and crop science. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Selangor, pp 222-224.
26. Iyamabo O, Hayes PM (1995) Effects of selection and opportunities for recombination in doubled-haploid populations of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Breed 114: 131-136.
27. Jannink J (2005) Selective phenotyping to accurately map quantitative trait loci. Crop Sci 45: 901-908.
28. Jannink J, Abadie T (1998) Inbreeding method effects on genetic mean, variance, and structure of recurrent selection populations. Crop Sci 39: 988-997.
29. Jinks J, Pooni H (1976) Predicting the properties of recombinant inbred lines derived by single seed descent. Heredity 36: 253-266.
30. Kearsey M, Sturley S (1984) A model for the incorporation of epistasis into a computer simulation for three experimental designs. Heredity 52: 373-382.
31. Laurie C, et al. (2004) The genetic architecture of response to long-term artificial selection for oil concentration in the maize kernel. Genetics 168: 2141-2155.
32. Lee M, et al.(2002) Expanding the genetic map of maize with the intermated B739 × Mo17 (IBM) population. Plant Mol Biol 48: 451-461.
33. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland.
34. McMullen M et al (2009) Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325: 737-740.
35. Muller H (1932) Some genetic aspects of sex. Am Nat 66: 118-138.
36. Muller H (1964) The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat Res 1: 2-9.
37. Murigneux A, Baud S, Beckert M (1993) Molecular and morphological evaluation of doubled-haploid lines in maize. 2. comparison with single-seed-descent lines. Theor Appl Genet 87: 278-287.
38. Neher R, Shraiman B (2009) Competition between recombination and epistasis can cause a transition from allele to genotype selection. PNAS 106: 6866-6871.
39. Otto S, Jones C (2000) Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait. Genetics 156: 2093-2107.
40. Park S, Walsh E, Reinbergs E, Song L, Kasha K (1976) Field perfomance of doubled haploid barley lines in comparison with lines developed by the pedigree and ssd methods. Can J Plant Sci 56: 467-474.
41. Presgraves D (2005) Recombination enhances protein adaptation in drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 15: 1651-1656.
42. Riggs T, Snape J (1977) Effects of linkage and interaction in a comparison of theoretical populations derived by diploidized haploid and single seed descent methods. Theor Appl Genet 49: 111-115.
43. Riley R, Law C, Chapman V (1981) The control of recombination. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 292: 529-534.
44. Rodell C, Schipper M, Keenan D (2004) Modes of selection and recombination response in Drosophila melanogaster. J Hered 95: 70-75.
45. Simmonds N (1979) Principles of crop improvement. Longman, London.
46. Smith J, et al. (2008) Use of doubled haploids in maize breeding: implications for intellectual property protection and genetic diversity in hybrid crops. Mol Breed 22: 51-59.
47. Snape J (1976) A theoretical comparison of diploidized haploid and single seed descent populations. Heredity 36: 275-277.
48. Song Q, et al. (2005) Development and mapping of microsatellite (SSR) markers in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 110: 550-560.
49. Szucs P, et al. (2009) An integrated resource for barley linkage map and malting quality QTL alignment. Plant Genome 2: 134-140.
50. Tanksley S, Nelson J (1996). Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet 92: 191-203.
51. Tanksley S, Young N, Paterson A, Bonierbale M (1989) RFLP mapping in plant breeding: New tools for an old science. Nature Biotechnol 7: 257-264.
52. Wijnker E, de Jong H (2008) Managing meiotic recombination in plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci 13: 640-646.
53. Wolf H, Wohrmann K, Tomiuk J (1987) Experimental evidence for the adaptive value of sexual reproduction. Genetica 72: 151-159.
54. Xu Z, Zou F, Vision T (2005) Improving quantitative trait loci mapping resolution in experimental crosses by the use of genotypically selected samples. Genetics 170: 401-408.
55. Zhong S, Jannink J (2007) Using quantitative trait loci results to discriminate among crosses on the basis of their progeny mean and variance. Genetics 177: 567-576.