Validity and reliability of measuring activities, movement intensity and energy expenditure with the DynaPort MoveMonitor

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1499-1505

  de Groot, Sonja ^a,b   Nieuwenhuizen, Mieke G ^a  

^a Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center Reade   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Activity detection; Adults; Monitoring; Physical activity; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER DATA; ACTIVITY DETECTION; ADULTS; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; OXYGEN UPTAKE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; WALKING SPEED; WALKING VELOCITY;

ACCELEROMETERS; MONITORING; OXYGEN; PATIENT REHABILITATION; WALKING AIDS;

RELIABILITY;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYCLING; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SITTING; STANDING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; WALKING SPEED;

ACTIVITY DETECTION; ADULTS; MONITORING; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; REHABILITATION;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; AGED; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; OXYGEN; RESPIRATION; SOFTWARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883193131     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. van den Berg-Emons R.J., Bussmann J.B., Haisma J.A., Sluis T.A., van der Woude L.H., Bergen M.P., et al. A prospective study on physical activity levels after spinal cord injury during inpatient rehabilitation and the year after discharge. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89:2094-2101.
2. van den Berg-Emons R.J., Schasfoort F.C., de Vos L.A., Bussmann J.B., Stam H.J. Impact of chronic pain on everyday physical activity. Eur J Pain 2007, 11:587-593.
3. Li J., Siegrist J. Physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease - a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2012, 9:391-407.
4. Thune I., Furberg A.S. Physical activity and cancer risk: dose-response and cancer, all sites and site-specific. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33:S530-S550.
5. Affuso O., Stevens J., Catellier D., McMurray R.G., Ward D.S., Lytle L., et al. Validity of self-reported leisure-time sedentary behavior in adolescents. J Negat Results Biomed 2011, 10:2.
6. Bussmann J.B., Grootscholten E.A., Stam H.J. Daily physical activity and heart rate response in people with a unilateral transtibial amputation for vascular disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004, 85:240-244.
7. Gorter J.W., Noorduyn S.G., Obeid J., Timmons B.W. Accelerometry: a feasible method to quantify physical activity in ambulatory and nonambulatory adolescents with cerebral palsy. Int J Pediatr 2012, 2012:329284.
8. Nguyen H.Q., Steele B.G., Dougherty C.M., Burr R. Physical activity patterns of patients with cardiopulmonary illnesses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 93(12):2360-2366.
9. van Hees V., van Lummel R.C., Westerterp K.R. Estimating activity-related energy expenditure under sedentary conditions using a tri-axial seismic accelerometer. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009, 17:1287-1292.
10. Dijkstra B., Kamsma Y.P., Zijlstra W. Detection of gait and postures using a miniaturized triaxial accelerometer-based system: accuracy in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010, 91:1272-1277.
11. Dijkstra B., Kamsma Y., Zijlstra W. Detection of gait and postures using a miniaturised triaxial accelerometer-based system: accuracy in community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing 2010, 39:259-262.
12. Langer D., Gosselink R., Sena R., Burtin C., Decramer M., Troosters T. Validation of two activity monitors in patients with COPD. Thorax 2009, 64:641-642.
13. Garby L., Astrup A. The relationship between the respiratory quotient and the energy equivalent of oxygen during simultaneous glucose and lipid oxidation and lipogenesis. Acta Physiol Scand 1987, 129:443-444.
14. Tweedy S.M., Trost S.G. Validity of accelerometry for measurement of activity in people with brain injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005, 37:1474-1480.
15. Kuffel E.E., Crouter S.E., Haas J.D., Frongillo E.A., Bassett D.R. Validity of estimating minute-by-minute energy expenditure of continuous walking bouts by accelerometry. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:92.
16. Reilly J.J., Kelly L.A., Montgomery C., Jackson D.M., Slater C., Grant S., et al. Validation of Actigraph accelerometer estimates of total energy expenditure in young children. Int J Pediatr Obes 2006, 1:161-167.
17. Yokoyama Y., Kawamura T., Tamakoshi A., Noda A., Hirai M., Saito H., et al. Comparison of accelerometry and oxymetry for measuring daily physical activity. Circ J 2002, 66:751-754.
18. Fox E.L., Bowers R.W., Foss M.L. The Physiological Basis of Physical Education and Athletics 1989, Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA. 4th ed.
19. de Vet H.C., Terwee C.B., Mokkink L.B., Knol D.L. Measurement in Medicine 2011, University Press, Cambridge. 1st ed.
20. Welk G.J., Schaben J.A., Morrow J.R. Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004, 36:1637-1645.
21. Van Remoortel H., Giavedoni S., Raste Y., Burtin C., Louvaris Z., Gimeno-Santos E., et al. Proactive consortium. Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012, 9:84.