A practical approach for incorporating dependence among fields in probabilistic record linkage

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Daggy, Joanne K ^a   Xu, Huiping ^a   Hui, Siu L ^a   Gamache, Roland E ^a   Grannis, Shaun J ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 84883179492     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-97     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Health IT Policy Committee Transmittal Letter. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology http://www.healthit.gov/facas/ sites/faca/files/hitpc-transmittal-letter-priv-sectigerteam-020211.pdf
2. Ignoring dependency between linking variables and its impact on the outcome of probabilistic record linkage studies. Tromp M, Meray N, Ravelli AC, Reitsma JB, Bonsel GJ, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008 15 5 654 660 10.1197/jamia.M2265 18579842
3. Record linkage methods for multidatabase data mining. Torra V, Domingo-Ferrer J, Information fusion in data mining Heidelberg: Springer, Torra V, 2003 101 132
4. A quantitative comparison of disclosure control methods for microdata. Domingo-Ferrer J, Torra V, Confidentiality, Disclosure,and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies New York: Elsevier, Doyle P, Lane JI, Theeuwes JM, Zayatz LM, 2001 111 133
5. Distance-based and probabilistic record linkage for re-identification of records with categorical variables. Domingo-Ferrer J, Torra V, Butlletí de ĺACIA, Associació Catalana d́Intelligència Artificial 2002 243 250
6. Using Mahalanobis distance-based record linkage for disclosure risk assessment. Torra V, Abowd J, Domingo-Ferrer J, Privacy in Statistical Databases vol. 4302 Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, Domingo-Ferrer J, Franconi L, 2006 233 242
7. A Theory for record linkage. Fellegi IP, Sunter AB, J Am Stat Assoc 1969 64 1183 1210 10.1080/01621459.1969.10501049
8. The discrimination power of dependency structures in record linkage. Thibaudeau Y, Surv Methodol 1993 19 31 38
9. The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Vacek PM, Biometrics 1985 41 4 959 968 10.2307/2530967 3830260
10. A method for consideration of conditional dependencies in the Fellegi and Sunter model of record linkage. Schürle J, Stat Pap 2005 46 3 433 449 10.1007/BF02762843
11. Haberman SJ, Analysis of qualitative data: Vol. II. New developments New York: Academic Press 1979
12. Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences. Clogg CC, New York: Plenum, Arminger G, Clogg CC, Sobel ME, 1995 311 359
13. Latent class marginal models for cross-classification of counts. Becker MP, Yang I, Sociol Methodol 1998 28 293 325 10.1111/0081-1750.00050 (Pubitemid 128339311)
14. Using latent class models to characterize and assess relative error in discrete measurements. Espeland MA, Handelman SL, Biometrics 1989 45 587 599 10.2307/2531499 2765639 (Pubitemid 19165268)
15. Latent variable modeling of diagnsotic accuracy. Yang I, Becker MP, Biometrics 1997 53 948 958 10.2307/2533555 9290225 (Pubitemid 27391024)
16. Improved decision rules in the Fellegi-Sunter model of record linkage. Winkler WE, Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association: 1993 1993 274 279
17. Modeling issues and the use of experience in record linkage. Larsen MD, Record Linkage Techniques-1997: Proceedings of an International Workshop and Exposition Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1997 95 105
18. Iterative automated record linkage using mixture models. Larsen MD, Rubin DB, J Am Stat Assoc 2001 96 453 32 41 10.1198/016214501750332956 (Pubitemid 33240628)
19. Stepwise variable selection in loglinear mixtures in record linkage. Zhu R, Zhang J, Zhang D, Yan G, Eur J Pure Appl Math 2010 3 2 141 162
20. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB, J R Stat Soc, Series B 1977 39 1 1 38
21. Matching and record linkage. Winkler WE, Business Survey Methods New York: J. Wiley 1995 355 384
22. Choosing models for cross-classification. Raftery A, Am Sociol Rev 1986 51 145 146 10.2307/2095483
23. Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests. Qu Y, Tan M, Kutner MH, Biometrics 1996 52 3 797 810 10.2307/2533043 8805757 (Pubitemid 26296059)
24. The Indiana network for patient care: an integrated clinical information system informed by over thirty years of experience. Biondich PG, Grannis SJ, J Public Health Manag Pract 2004 (Supp) 81 86
25. A biomedical application of latent class models with random effects. Hadgu A, Qu Y, J R Stat Soc, Series C (Applied Statistics) 1998 47 4 603 616
26. A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests. Xu H, Craig BA, Biometrics 2009 65 1145 1155 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01194.x 19210729
27. A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard. Albert PS, Dodd LE, Biometrics 2004 60 2 427 435 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00187.x 15180668 (Pubitemid 38780202)