Giving rheumatology patients online home access to their electronic medical record (EMR): Advantages, drawbacks and preconditions according to care providers

Rheumatology International

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2405-2410

  Van Der Vaart, Rosalie ^a   Drossaert, Constance H C ^a   Taal, Erik ^a   Van De Laar, Mart A F J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b MEDISCH SPECTRUM TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

eHealth; Electronic medical record; Empowerment; Patient access; Patient portal; Quality of care

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSULTATION; DELPHI STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMPOWERMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; NURSE; NURSE PRACTITIONER; ONLINE MONITORING; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RHEUMATOLOGY; SELF CARE; WORKLOAD;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); QUESTIONNAIRES; RHEUMATOLOGY; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84883160767     PISSN: 01728172     EISSN: 1437160X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-012-2408-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Demiris G, Afrin LB, Speedie S et al (2008) Patient-centered applications: use of information technology to promote disease management and wellness. A white paper by the AMIA knowledge in motion working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15:8-13
2. Ross SE, Todd J, Moore LA et al (2005) Expectations of patients and physicians regarding patient-accessible medical records. J Med Internet Res 7:e13
3. Ferreira A, Correia A, Silva A et al (2007) Why facilitate patient access to medical records. Med Care Compunetics 4:77-90
4. Honeyman A, Cox B, Fisher B (2005) Potential impacts of patient access to their electronic health records. Inform Prim Care 13:55-60
5. Van der Vaart R, Drossaert CHC, Taal E et al (2011) Patient preferences for a hospital based rheumatology Interactive Health Communication Application, and factors associated with these preferences. Rheumatology 50:1618-1626
6. Van der Vaart R, Drossaert CHC, Taal E et al (2010) Experiences and preferences of patients with rheumatic diseases regarding an interactive health communication application. In: Proceedings of the 2nd eTELEMED international conference on ehealth, telemedicine, and social medicine; 2010 Feb, Saint Martin 64-71 doi: 10.1109/eTELEMED.2010.16
7. Richter JG, Becker A, Koch T et al (2010) Changing attitudes towards online electronic health records and online patient documentation in rheumatology outpatients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 28:261-264
8. Masys D, Baker D, Butros A et al (2002) Giving patients access to their medical records via the internet: the PCASSO experience. J Am Med Informs Assoc 9:181-191
9. Reti SR, Feldman HJ, Ross SE et al (2010) Improving personal health records for patient-centered care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:192-195
10. Earnest M, Ross SE, Wittevrongel L et al (2004) Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11:410-417
11. Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ (2004) Overcoming structural constraints to patient utilization of electronic medical records: a critical review and proposal for an evaluation framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11:151-161
12. Leonard K, Wiljer D, Casselman M (2008) An innovative information paradigm for consumers with chronic conditions: the value proposition. J Inf Tech Health Care 6:274-282
13. Dunn WN (1981) Public policy analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
14. Adler M, Ziglio E (1996) Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London
15. Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc., London
16. Members list of the Dutch Association for Rheumatology | [Ledenlijst Nederlandse Vereniging voor Reumatologie] (2010) Haarlem, DCHG Partner in medische communicatie
17. Members list of the Dutch Health Professionals in Rheumatology | [Ledenlijst Nederlandse Health Professionals in de Reumatologie] (2010) Haarlem, DCHG Partner in medische communicatie
18. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
19. Siteman E, Businger A, Gandhi T et al (2006) Clinicians recognize value of patient review of their electronic health record data. In: Proceedings of the AMIA symposium, Washington, DC, p 1101
20. Bhavnani V, Fisher B, Winfield M, Seed P (2010) How patients use access to their electronic GP record: a quantitative study. Fam Pract 0:1-7
21. Ross SE, Lin C (2003) The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review. J Am Med Assoc 10:129-138
22. Cardoso AB, Lima AF, Pereira AF et al (2005) The access to medical records: a systematic review. University of Porto, Faculty of Medicine [Internet]. Available from: http://medicina.med.up.pt/im/trabalhos05-06/sites/ Turma2/files/final.pdf
23. Ralston JD, Carrell D, Reid R et al (2007) Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:798-806
24. Fisher B, Bhavnani V, Winfield M (2009) How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice. J R Soc Med 102:538-544
25. Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Weingart SN et al (2008) Comparing patient-reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not? Ann Intern Med 149:100-108