What did bain really say? A preliminary forensic analysis of the disputed utterance based on data, acoustic analysis, statistical models, calculation of likelihood ratios, and testing of validity

Proceedings of the AES International Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 203-207

  Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart ^a   Hoy, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS; FORENSIC ANALYSIS; LIKELIHOOD RATIOS; PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATION THEORY;

ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES;

EID: 84883122841     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Bain v R [2009] NZSC 16.
2. B. Innes, "R v David Bain - A unique case in New Zealand legal and linguistic history" International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law vol. 18, pp. 145-155 (2011). doi:10.1558/ijsll.v18i1.145.
3. P. Rose, "Evaluation of disputed utterance evidence in the matter of David Bain's retrial" Report prepared for court case, 23 February 2009. Available: http://rose-morrison.forensicvoice-comparison.net/.
4. N. Brümmer, J. du Preez, "Application independent evaluation of speaker detection, " Computer Speech and Language vol. 20, pp. 230-275 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.csl.2005.08.001.
5. D.A. van Leeuwen, N. Brümmer, "An introduction to application-independent evaluation of speaker recognition systems" in C. Müller (Ed.) Speaker Classification I: Selected Projects, Springer, pp. 330-353 (2007).
6. G.S. Morrison, "Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems, " Science & Justice vol. 51, pp. 91-98 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.03.002.