Facilitating collective musical creativity

Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 191-198

  Tanaka, Atau ^a   Tokui, Nao ^a   Momeni, Ali ^a  

^a SONY COMPUTER SCIENCE LABORATORY   (France)

Author keywords

Interactive music; Online communities; Peer to peer; Sensor interfaces; Social computing

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE MUSIC; ON-LINE COMMUNITIES; PEER TO PEER; SENSOR INTERFACE; SOCIAL COMPUTING;

MOBILE DEVICES;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84883120992     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1101149.1101177     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Creative Commons, http://www.creativecommons.org
2. Gresham-Lancaster, S., The Aesthetics and history of the Hub: The Effects of Changes Technology on Network Computer Music. Leonardo Music Journal, 1998. 8: p. 39-44.
3. Neuhaus, Neuhaus, http://www.ubu.com/sound/neuhaus-radio.html
4. Föllmer, G., Soft Music, http://crossfade.walkerart.org
5. Föllmer, G. and E. Ungeheuer, Netzmusik-Stand der elektroakustischen Musik oder Musik von anderen Planeten? Ein Printchat, In Elektroakustische Musik - Handbuch der Musik im 20, E. Ungeheuer, editor. 2002, Laaber-Verlag: Jahrhundert Band 5 Laaber. p. 303-316.
6. Yamagishi, S. and K. Setoh. Variations for WWW - Network Music by MAX and the WWW. in International Computer Music Conference. 1998.
7. Stelkens, J. peerSynth: a P2P Multi-User Software Synthesizer with new techniques for integrating latency in real time collaboration. in International Computer Music Conference. 2003.
8. Jordà, S., Faust Music On Line (FMOL): An Approach to Real-time Collective Composition on the Internet. Leonardo Music Journal, 1999. 9(5-12).
9. Barbosa, A., Displaced Soundscapes: A Survey of Network Systems for Music and Sonic Art Creation. Leonardo Music Journal, 2003. 13: p. 53-60.
10. Tanaka, A., von Telepräsenz su Co-erfahrung: ein jahrzehnt netzwerkmusik (From Telepresence to Co-experience: A Decade of Network Music. Neue Zeitschrift für Musik, 2004. 5: p. 27-28.
11. Tanaka, A., Composing as a function of Infrastructure, In Surface Tension: Problematics of Site, K. Ehrlich and B. LaBelle, editors. 2003, Errant Bodies Press: Los Angeles.
12. Spiegel, L., Graphical GROOVE: memorial for the VAMPIRE, a visual music system. Organised Sound, Cambridge University Press, 1998, 3(3): p. 187-191.
13. Tanaka, A., Interaction, Experience and the Future of Music, In Consuming Music Together: Social and Collaborative Aspects of Music Consumption Technologies, O'Hara and Brown, editors. 2005, Kluwer Academic Press: London.
14. Wanderley, M. and M. Battier, eds. Trends in Gestural Control of Music. 2000, IRCAM: Paris, France.
15. Cope, D., Computers and Musical Style. 1991, Madison, WI: AR Editions.
16. Pachet, F. The Continuator: Musical Interaction with Style. in Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. 2002. Göteborg, Sweden: ICMA.
17. Momeni, A., Composing Instruments: Inventing and Performing with Generative Computer-based Instruments, in Music. 2005, University of California: Berkeley. p. 51.
18. Takemitsu, T., Takemitsu: My Way of Life, 2004, http://www.kajimotomusic. com/concert/2005/takemitsu/music/music.html
19. JazzMutant, Lemur, 2004, http://www.jazzmutant.com/lemur-overview.php
20. Wacom, T., Wacom Intuos Drawing Tablet, 2004, http://www.wacom.com/
21. Momeni, A. and D. Wessel. Characterizing and Controlling Musical material intuitively with Geometric Models. in New Instruments for Musical Expression. 2003. Montreal, Canada.
22. Momeni, A. and C. Henry, Dynamic Independent Mapping Layers for Concurrent Control of Audio and Video Synthesis. Computer Music Journal, 30(1), 2006 in press.
23. Tokui, N., Sonasphere, http://www.sonasphere.com/
24. Dodgeball, http://www.dodgeball.com
25. Barabási, A.-L., Linked: The New Science of Networks. 2002, Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
26. LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com
27. Orkut, http://www.orkut.com
28. Preece, J., Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. 2000, New York, NY: J. Wiley.
29. Salon, http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/08/01/bootlegs/
30. Wired Magazine, 2004, 12(11).
31. ccmixter, http://www.ccmixter.org
32. Tanaka, A. mobile Music Making. in International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. 2004. Hamamatsu, Japan.
33. Tanaka, A., Valadon, G. Social Mechanisms for Bootstrapping Trust in Ad-hoc Networks. Sony Computer Science Laboratory Symposium & Open House. 2003.
34. Wright, M. and A. Freed. Open Sound Control: A New Protocol for Communicating with Sound Synthesizers. in International Computer Music Conference. 1997. Thessaloniki, Hellas: International Computer Music Association.
35. Icecast, Icecast, http://www.icecast.org
36. Aucouturier, J.J. and Pachet, F. Representing Musical Genre: A State of the Art. Journal of New Music Research, 32(1), 2003.
37. Foote, J. Automatic Audio Segmentation using a Measure of Audio Novelty. in IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. 2000.
38. Foote, J. and S. Uchihashi. The Beet Spectrum: A New Approach to Rhythm Analysis. in IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. 2001.
39. ID3 Reference. http://www.id3.org/id3v2.3.0.html
40. Wessel, D.L., Timbre space as a musical control structure. Computer Music Journal, 1979. 3(2): p. 45-52.
41. Barrass, S. and P.K. Robertson. Data exploration with sound using a perceptually linearized sound space. in Visual Data Exploration and Analysis II. 1995. San Jose, CA, USA.
42. Erickson, T. and W.A. Kellogg, Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems that Mesh with Social Processes. ACM Transactions on Human Computer Interface, 2000. 7(1): p. 59-83