Teaching practices of engineering faculty: Perceptions and actual behavior

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 279-289

  Finelli, Cynthia J ^a   Daly, Shanna R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM PRACTICES; ENGINEERING FACULTY; FACULTY PERCEPTIONS; TEACHING PRACTICES;

STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84883120213     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Brawner, C. E., and Felder., R. M., Allen, R., & Brent, R. (2002). A survey of faculty teaching practices and involvement in faculty development activities. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(4), 393-395.
2. Friedrich, K., Sellers, S., & Burstyn, J. (2009). Thawing the chilly climate: Inclusive teaching resources for science, technology, engineering, and math. In D. Robertson and L. Nilson (Eds.), To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational Development. Jossey-Bass.
3. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes PD effective? American Education Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
4. Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In G. Sykes and L. Darling Hammond (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy. New York. Teachers College.
5. Hora, M., Ferrare, J., & Anderson, C. (2009). Structured observation protocol for instruction in Institutions of Higher Education. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
6. Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 517-534.
7. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Murray, H.G. (1985). Classroom teaching behaviors related to college teaching effectiveness. In J.G. Donald & A.M. Sullivan (Eds.), Using Research to Improve Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-246.
10. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
11. Smith, K., Sheppard, S., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, January, 87-101.
12. Stewart, A., Malley, J., & LaVaque-Manty, D. (2007). Faculty recruitment: Mobilizing science and engineering faculty. In A. Stewart, J. Malley, and D. LaVaque-Manty (Eds.), Transforming science and engineering: Advancing academic women (pp. 133-151). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
13. Tobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb, they're different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation
14. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(44), 409-424.
15. Von Glaserfield, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. Pergamon. Oxford.
16. Wertsch, J. V. (1997). Vygotsky and the formation of the mind. Cambridge.
17. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.