Named entity extraction and disambiguation: The reinforcement effect

CTIT workshop proceedings series

Volumn WP11, Issue 02, 2011, Pages 9-16

  Habib, Mena B ^a   Van Keulen, Maurice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; EXTRACTION;

NAMED ENTITIES; NAMED ENTITY EXTRACTION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84883113241     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. M.B. Habib. Neogeography: The challenge of channelling large and ill-behaved data streams. In Workshops Proc. of the 27th IEEE Int'l Conf. on Data Engineering (ICDE 2011), pages 284-287, 2011.
2. R. Grishman and B. Sundheim. Message understanding conference - 6: A brief history. In Proc. of Int'l Conf. on Computational Linguistics, pages 466-471, 1996.
3. J.R. Hobbs, D. Appelt, J. Bear, D. Israel, M. Kameyama, M. Stickel, and M. Tyson. Fastus: A system for extracting information from text. In Proc. of Human Language Technology, pages 133-137, 1993.
4. R. Gaizauskas, T. Wakao, K. Humphreys, H. Cunningham, and Y. Wilks. University of Sheffield: Description of the LaSIE system as used for MUC-6. In Proc. of the 6th Conf. on Message understanding (MUC-6), pages 207-220, 1995.
5. K. Humphreys, R. Gaizauskas, S. Azzam, C. Huyck, B. Mitchell, H. Cunningham, and Y. Wilks. University of Sheffield: Description of the Lasie-II system as used for MUC-7. In Proc. of the 7th Conf. on Message Understanding (MUC-7), 1998.
6. G. Zhou and J. Su. Named entity recognition using an hmm-based chunk tagger. In Proc. of the 40th Ann. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 473-480, 2002.
7. S. Sekine. NYU: Description of the Japanese NE system used for MET-2. In Proc. of the 7th Conf. on Message Understanding MUC-7, 1998.
8. A. Borthwick, J. Sterling, E. Agichtein, and R. Grishman. NYU: Description of the MENE named entity system as used in MUC-7. In Proc. of the 7th Conf. on Message Understanding (MUC-7), 1998.
9. H. Isozaki and H. Kazawa. Efficient support vector classifiers for named entity recognition. In Proc. of the 19th Int'l Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2002), pages 1-7, 2002.
10. A. McCallum and W. Li. Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields, feature induction and web-enhanced lexicons. In Proc. of 7th Conf. on Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2003), pages 188-191, 2003.
11. N. Wacholder, Y. Ravin, and M. Choi. Disambiguation of proper names in text. In Proc. of the 5th Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLC 1997), pages 202-208, 1997.
12. D. Buscaldi and P. Rosso. A conceptual density-based approach for the disambiguation of toponyms. Int'l Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(3):301-313, 2008.
13. D. Smith and G. Crane. Disambiguating geographic names in a historical digital library. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, volume 2163 of LNCS, pages 127-136, 2001.
14. E. Rauch, M. Bukatin, and K. Baker. A confidence-based framework for disambiguating geographic terms. In Proc. of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Analysis of Geographic References, pages 50-54, 2003.
15. J.M.S. Overell and S. Ruger. Place disambiguation with co-occurrence models. In Proc. of the Working Notes of the Cross Language Evaluation Forum Workshop (CLEF 2006), 2006.
16. D.A. Smith and G.S. Mann. Bootstrapping toponym classifiers. In Proc. of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Analysis of Geographic References, pages 45-49, 2003.
17. B. Martins, I. Anast́acio, and P. Calado. A machine learning approach for resolving place references in text. In Proc. of the 13th AGILE Int'l Conf. on Geographic Information Science. Springer, 2010.
18. S. Sekine and C. Nobata. Definition, dictionaries and tagger for extended named entity hierarchy. In Proc. of Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), pages 1977-1980, 2004.
19. H. Cunningham. GATE, a general architecture for text engineering. Computers and the Humanities, 36(2):223-254, 2002.
20. T. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, 1997.
21. A. McCallum and K. Nigam. A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. In Proc. of the AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, pages 41-48, 1998.
22. S.-B. Kim, K.-S. Han, H.-C. Rim, and S.H. Myaeng. Some effective techniques for naive bayes text classification. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18:1457-1466, 2006. ISSN 1041-4347.
23. S. Abiteboul, B. Kimelfeld, Y. Sagiv, and P. Senellart. On the expressiveness of probabilistic xml models. The VLDB Journal, 18(5):1041-1064, 2009.
24. M. Mutsuzaki, M. Theobald, A. de Keijzer, J. Widom, P. Agrawal, O. Benjelloun, A. Das Sarma, R. Murthy, and T. Sugihara. Trio-One: Layering uncertainty and lineage on a conventional DBMS (demo). In 3rd Biennial Conf. on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR 2007), pages 269-274, 2007.
25. L. Antova, T. Jansen, C. Koch, and D. Olteanu. Fast and simple relational processing of uncertain data. In Proc. of the 24th Int'l Conf. on Data Engineering (ICDE 2008), pages 983-992. IEEE, April 2008.
26. M. van Keulen and A. de Keijzer. Qualitative effects of knowledge rules and user feedback in probabilistic data integration. The VLDB Journal, 18(5):1191-1217, 2009.