Evaluation of subjective video quality of mobile devices

Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 535-538

  Jumisko Pyykkö, Satu ^a   Häkkinen, Jukka ^b,c  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Audiovisual quality; Bitrate; Framerate; Mobile device; Picture ratio; Quality; Subjective evaluation; Video

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL QUALITY; BIT RATES; FRAME-RATE; PICTURE RATIO; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; VIDEO;

IMAGE QUALITY; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL; VIDEO STREAMING;

MOBILE DEVICES;

EID: 84883082172     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1101149.1101270     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. ANSI T1.801.02, Digital Transport of Video Teleconferencing /Video Telephony Signals - Performance Terms, Definitions, and Examples. New York: ANSI 1996.
2. Apteker, R.T., Fisher, J.A., Kisimov, V.S., Neishlos, H. Video Acceptability and Frame rate. IEEE Multimedia, 3(3):32-40, 1995.
3. Beerends, J.G. & de Caluwe, F.E. The influence of video quality on perceived audio quality and vice versa. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 47 (5), 355-362, 1999.
4. th International Conference on High Quality Audio Coding. Italy: September 1999.
5. Casey, B., Casey, N., Calvert, B., French, L., Justin, L. Television Studies - The Key Concepts. London: Routledge, 2002.
6. Finnpanel. Television audience measurements. http://www.finnpanel.fi. (visited 05/2004).
7. Fukuda K. Integrated QoS Control Mechanisms for RealTime Multimedia Systems in Reservation-Based Networks, PhD Thesis. Osaka University; 2000.
8. Hands, D. S. A Basic Multimedia Quality Model. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 6, No. 6, December (2004). pp. 806-816.
9. st ed. p.386. Switzerland; International Standardization Organization, 1990.
10. ITU-R BT.500-11 Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, International Telecommunications Union - Radiocommunication sector, 2002.
11. ITU-T P.910 Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications, International Telecommunications Union - Telecommunication sector, 1999.
12. McCarthy, J. D., Sasse M. A. and Miras D. "Sharp or Smooth?: Comparing the Effect of Quantization vs. Framerate for Streamed Video", 2004, Proc. of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems. Vienna: 2004. p. 535-542.
13. McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748, 1976.
14. Reeves, B. & Nass, C. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press. 1996
15. Van Wassenhove V., Grant K.W., Poeppel D. Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(4),1181-6, 2005.
16. Wiegand T., Sullivan G. J., Bjøntegaard G., Luthra A., Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol.13, No.7( 2003). pp. 1-19.
17. Winkler, S. & Faller, C. Audiovisual quality evaluation of low-bitrate video. Proc. SPIE/IS&T Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, Vol. 5666. San Jose, United States of America: January 2005. pp. 139-148
18. Winkler, S. & Faller, C. Maximizing audiovisual quality at low bitrates. Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics. Scottsdale, United States of America: January 2005.