|
Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 100-116
|
Environmental impact comparisons IGCC vs. PC plants
a a b |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COAL-FIRED POWER GENERATION;
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES;
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS;
INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE TECHNOLOGY;
POWER GENERATION TECHNOLOGY;
SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION SYSTEMS;
SOLID WASTE GENERATION;
WASTEWATER DISCHARGE;
COAL;
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY;
SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION;
SULFUR;
SULFUR DIOXIDE;
TECHNOLOGY;
WATER POLLUTION;
WATER SUPPLY;
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;
|
EID: 84883078251
PISSN: None
EISSN: None
Source Type: Conference Proceeding
DOI: None Document Type: Conference Paper |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (8)
|