Negative behavior space in the design of interactive agents

Proceedings of the 1st Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference, AIIDE 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 129-134

  Tomlinson, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; INTERACTIVE AGENTS; INTERACTIVE INSTALLATIONS; INTERACTIVE MEDIA; INTERACTIVITY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84883063622     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bailey, P. 1999. Searching for Storiness: Story-Generation from a Reader's Perspective. AAAI Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence.
2. Bergman, M., & Mark, G. 2002. Exploring the Relationship between Project Selection and Requirements Analysis: An Empirical Study of the New Millennium Program. Proceedings of the IEEE Joint Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2002), pp. 247-254. Essen, Germany.
3. Burleson, W., Picard, R.W., Perlin, K., & Lippincott, J. 2004. A Platform for Affective Agent Research. Workshop on Empathetic Agents, International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Columbia University, New York, NY.
4. Cooper, D. 1994. Writing Great Screenplays for Film and TV. New York, Macmillan.
5. Durfee, E., & Montgomery, T. 1991. Coordination as distributed search in a hierarchical behavior space. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21(6), 1363-1378.
6. Goldberg, D., & Mataric, M.J. 1999. Coordinating Mobile Robot Group Behavior Using a Model of Interaction Dynamics. Proceedings, Autonomous Agents '99. Seattle, WA.
7. Johnson, W.L. 2003. Interaction tactics for socially intelligent pedagogical agents. In IUI '03: Proceedings of the 8th int'l conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pp. 251-253. ACM Press.
8. Killeen, P.R. 1992. Mechanics of the animate. J Exp Anal Behav. 57(3), 429-463.
9. Lester, J., & Stone, B. 1997. Increasing Believability in Animated Pedagogical Agents. Proceedings of the First Int'l Conference on Autonomous Agents.
10. Lewis, D. 1984. Pencil Drawing Techniques. Watson- Guptill Publications, New York, NY.
11. Mali, A., & Mukerjee, A. 1998. Metrics For Evaluation of Behavior-Based Robotic Systems. Proceedings of ICRA (IEEE Int'l Conference on Robotics and Automation), pp. 1122-1127. Belgium.
12. Marsella, S.C., Johnson, W.L., & LaBore, C. 2000. Interactive Pedagogical Drama. Proceedings of the 4th Int'l Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 301-308.
13. Matarić, M.J. 1992. Behavior-Based Systems: Main Properties and Implications. Proceedings of IEEE Int'l Conference on Robotics and Automation, Workshop on Architectures for Intelligent Control Systems, pp. 46-54. Nice, France.
14. Mateas, M. 2002. Interactive Drama, Art, and Artificial Intelligence. PhD. Dissertation, School of Computer Science. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
15. McCloud, S. 1993/2003. Time Frames (from Understanding Comics). In The New Media Reader, Wardrip-Fruin, N., & Montfort, N., Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Mech, L.D. 1999. Alpha status, dominance, and division of labor in wolf packs. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 1196-1203.
17. Pagulayan, R.J., Keeker, K., Wixon, D., Romero, R., & Fuller, T. (In press). User-centered design in games. In Handbook for Human-Computer Interaction in Interactive Systems, Jacko, J., & Sears, A., Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
18. PBS. 2002. The Intimate Machine, http://pbssaf.virage.com/cgi-bin/ visearch?user=pbssaf&template=template.html&query=Alpha+Wolf& category=0&viKeyword=Alpha+Wolf (last viewed: 4/1/05). In Scientific American Frontiers.
19. Robertson, J., & McDaniel, C. 1999. Painting as a Language: Material, Technique, Form, Content. Wadsworth Publishing, Australia.
20. Simon, H. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Stone, B., & Lester, J. 1996. Dynamically sequencing an animated pedagogical agent. Proceedings of AAAI, pp. 424-431. Portland, OR.
22. Tomlinson, B. 2004. Virtual Raft Project, http://www.ics.uci.edu/~wmt/ movies/VirtualRaftProject.mov(last viewed: 4/1/05). In Virtual Raft Project website.
23. Tomlinson, B., & Blumberg, B. 2002. Synthetic Social Relationships in Animated Virtual Characters. From Animals to Animats 7 (SAB '02).
24. Tomlinson, B., Downie, M., Berlin, M., Gray, J., Lyons, D., Cochran, J., & Blumberg, B. 2002. Leashing the AlphaWolves: Mixing User Direction with Autonomous Emotion in a Pack of Semi-Autonomous Virtual Characters. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation. San Antonio, TX.
25. Williams, C., & Hogg, T. 1994. Exploiting the Deep Structure of Constraint Problems. Artificial Intelligence 70(73-117).
26. Wong, W. 1993. Principles of Form and Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
27. Wray, R., & Laird, J. 2003. Variability in Human Behavior Modeling for Military Simulations. Proceedings of Behavior Representation in Modeling & Simulation Conference (BRIMS).
28. Zelanski, P. 1995. Shaping Space: The Dynamics of Three- Dimensional Design. Harcourt College Publishers, Orlando, FL.