Advantages and drawbacks of expectoration decontamination methods for tuberculosis and anti-tuberculosis drug resistance diagnosis;Avantages et limites des méthodes de décontamination des expectorations pour le diagnostic de la tuberculose et des résistances aux antituberculeux

Annales de Biologie Clinique

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 283-291

  Zingué, Dezemon ^a   Hien, Hervé ^a,d   Méda, Nicolas ^a   Zida, Sylvie ^a   Kaboré, Antoinette ^a   Sanou, Adama ^a,c   Ouédraogo, Abdoul Salam ^b   Gomgnimbou, Michel ^a   Diandé, Souba ^e   Tarnagda, Zékiba ^d   Godreuil, Sylvain ^c  

^a CENTRE MURAZ   (Burkina Faso)

^b Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Souro Sanou   (Burkina Faso)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d IRSS Bobo Dioulasso ^*  (Burkina Faso)

^e Programme National de Lutte Contre la Tuberculose Ouagadougou   (Burkina Faso)

Author keywords

Culture; Decontamination; Mycobacterium; Sputum; Tuberculosis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE; MULTIDRUG RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS; MYCOBACTERIUM; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; SPUTUM; TUBERCULOSIS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

CULTURE; DECONTAMINATION; MYCOBACTERIUM; SPUTUM; TUBERCULOSIS;

BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; DECONTAMINATION; DRUG RESISTANCE, MULTIPLE, BACTERIAL; HUMANS; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; SPUTUM; TUBERCULOSIS; TUBERCULOSIS, MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT;

EID: 84883058500     PISSN: 00033898     EISSN: 19506112     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1684/abc.2013.0815     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cadmus S, Falodun O, Fagade O. Methods of sputum decontamination with emphasis on local tuberculosis laboratories. Afr J Med Med Sci 2011; 40 : 5-14.
2. Panchal S,Kulchestras S, Khublani TK.Areviewon TBand its advance diagnostic techniques. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2011; 2 : 535-45.
3. Rivas C, Coitinho C, Dafond V, Corbo M, Baldjian M. Performance of the Ogawa-Kudoh method for isolation of mycobacteria in a laboratory with large-scale workload. Revista argentina de microbiología 2010; 42 : 87-90.
4. WHO. Global tuberculosis control : WHO report 2011. France, 2011.
5. Bacterioweb. Mycobactéries 19.available at : http://bacterioweb. univfcomte. fr/bibliotheque/remic/19-Mycob.pdf. [cited; Available from : file///E:/article-decontamination%20des%20crachats/19-Mycob.pdf.
6. UICTMR. Guide technique. Diagnostic de la tuberculose par examen microscopique direct des expectorations dans les pays à faibles revenus. 5e édition. Paris : UICTMR, 2000.
7. Ligue pulmonaire suisse. Manuel de la tuberculose. 2e édition. www.tbinfo.ch/uploads/media/Handbuch-Tuberculose-fr-140507.pdf (consulté le 15 avril 2013).
8. Karin W. Laboratory services in tuberculosis control. Part II. Microscopy. WHO Tech Bull 1998; 98 : 258.
9. Kulkarni M, Puranik R, Annam V. Comparison of the modified fluorescent method and conventional Ziehl-Neelsen method in the detection of acidfast bacilli in lymphnode aspirates. Cytojournal 2009; 6 : 13.
10. Gordin FSG. The validity of acid-fast smears in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114 : 1025-7.
11. Chaudhary SK. Comparison of hypertonic saline - sodium hydroxide decontamination method with modified petroff's method for concentrating sputum samples. Karnataka, Bangalore; Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, 2010.
12. McClean MST, Stanley S, Maeda Y, Goldsmith CE, Shepherd R, Millar BC, et al. Identification and characterization of breakthrough contaminants associated with the conventional isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Med Microbiol 2011; 60 : 1292-8.
13. Kaufmann SHE, Hahn H. Mycobacteria and TB. Basel : Karger, 2003.
14. Langerova M. Comparaison de différentes méthodes d'homogénéisation et de purification des produits pathologiques en fonction de milieux de culture solides ou liquides. Bull Wld Hlih Org 1968; 39 : 663-80.
15. Kubica GP, Cohn ML, Middlebrook G. Sputum digestion and decontamination with N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide for culture of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis 1963; 87 : 775-9.
16. Sula L. Comparative trials with different decontaminating agents for growing Mycobacterium tuberculosis from culture specimens. Bull World Health Organ 1968; 39 : 647-55.
17. Yajko DM, Nassos PS, Sanders CA, Gonzalez PC, Reingold AL, Horsburgh CR, et al. Comparison of four decontamination methods for recovery of Mycobacterium avium complex from stools. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31 : 302-6.
18. Collins C. Oxalic acid and acid-iron peroxide in the routine culture of tubercle bacilli from sputum. Tubercle 1952; 33 : 149-51.
19. Kent PT. Public health mycobacteriology. A guide to the level III laboratory. Atlanta, Ga : Centers for Disease Control, 1985.
20. Kudoh S, Kudoh T. A simple technique for culturing tubercle bacilli. Bull World Health Organ 1974; 51 : 71-82.
21. Huchon-Becel D. La chlorhexidine. In : Hygiène hospitalière pratique. 2e édition. Paris : Éditions Médicales Internationales, 1990 : 314-46.
22. Ricaldi JN, Guerra H. A simple and improved method for diagnosis of tuberculosis using hypertonic saline and sodium hydroxide to concentrate and decontaminate sputum. Tropical Doctor 2008; 38 : 97-9.
23. Selvakumar NV, Gopi PG, Venkataramu KV, Datta M, Paramasivan CN. Isolation of tubercle bacilli from sputum samples of patients in the field studies by the cetylpyridinium chloride-sodium chloride & sodium hydroxide methods. Indian J Med Res 1995; 102 : 149-51.
24. Ganoza CA, Ricaldi JN, Chauca J, Rojas G, Munayco CS, Agapito J, et al. Novel hypertonic saline and sodium hydroxide [HS and SH] method for decontamination and concentration of sputum samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis microscopy and culture. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57 : 1094-8.
25. Ferroni AS, Vu-Thien H, Lanotte P, Le Bourgeois M, Sermet- Gaudelus I, Fauroux B, et al. Value of the chlorhexidine decontamination method for recovery of nontuberculous mycobacteria from sputum samples of patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44 : 2237-9.
26. Ambrosio SR, Oliveira EMD, Rocriguez CAR. Comparison of three decontamination methods for Mycobacterium bovis isolation. Braz J Microbiol 2008; 39 : 241-4.
27. Buijtels PCAM, Petit PLC. Comparison of NaOH-N-acetyl cysteine and sulfuric acid decontamination methods for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Journal of microbiological methods 2005; 62 : 83.
28. SmithwickRW,Stratigos CB, David HL. Use of cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium chloride for the decontamination of sputum specimens that are transported to the laboratory for the isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1975; 1 : 411-3.
29. Jaspe RC, Rojas YM, Flores LA, Sofia Toro E, Takiff H, De Waard JH. Evaluation of the Kudoh swab method for the culturing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in rural areas. Tropical Medicine&International Health 2009; 14 : 468.
30. Peres RL, Maciel EL, Morais CG, Ribeiro FCK, Vinhas SA, Pinheiro C, et al. Comparison of two concentrations of NALC-NaOH for decontamination of sputum for mycobacterial culture. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009; 13 : 1572.
31. Rossana CJ, Yeimy MR, Lalis AF, Sofia TE, Howard T, de Waardacobus J. Evaluation of the Kudoh swab method for the culturing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in rural areas. Trop Med Int Health 2009; 14 : 468-71.
32. Carbonnelle B, Dailoux M, Lebrun L, Maugein J, Pernot C. Mycobactéries. Mycobactérioses. Cahiers Bioforma. Paris : Bioforma, 2003.