Bias in a common EEG and MEG statistical analysis and how to avoid it

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 124, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2062-2063

  Kilner, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; LETTER; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 84883054211     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.03.024     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Maris E., Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 2007, 164:177-190.
2. Kilner J.M., Friston K.J. Topological inference of EEG and MEG data. Ann Appl Stat 2010, 4:272-290.
3. Kriegeskorte N., Simmons W.K., Bellgowan P.S., Baker C.I. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat Neurosci 2009, 12:535-540.
4. Poldrack R.A., Fletcher P.C., Henson R.N., Worsley K.J., Brett M., Nichols T.E. Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2008, 40:409-414.