Anchoring of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-18

  Elzen, Boelie ^a,b   Van Mierlo, Barbara ^a   Leeuwis, Cees ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anchoring; Energy transition; Glasshouse horticulture; Niche regime linking; System innovation

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ENERGY USE; HORTICULTURE; INNOVATION; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84883052398     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22104224     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. AVAG, 2004. Innoveren in een glazen huis (Innovating in a Glass House). AVAG (Association of Glasshouse Suppliers), 's Gravenzande.
2. Berkhout, F., Smith, A., Stirling, A., 2004. Socio-technical regimes and transition contexts. In: Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Green, K. (Eds.), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham.
3. Boonekamp, G., 2006. Synergie laat kennis vrijelijk stromen (Synergie make knowledge move freely). Groenten en Fruit, 20-21, week 46.
4. Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A. (Eds.), 1986. Mapping the Dynamic of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. Macmillan, London.
5. Cli Mate, 2008. Verdampingskoeling of adiabatische koeling van het gewas (Evaporative or Adiabatic Cooling of a Crop). http://www.kasklimaat.nl/288-Verdampingskoeling.htm
6. Constant, E.W., 1980. The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
7. Correljé, A., Verbong, G., 2004. The transition from coal to gas: radical change of the Dutch gas system. In: Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Green, K. (Eds.), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, pp. 114-136.
8. de Gelder, A., Kipp, J.A., 2005. Perspectiefstudie voor (semi-) gesloten kassystemen (Study of Perspectives of (Semi-) Closed Glasshouse Systems). WUR-PPO, Wageningen.
9. de Zwart, H.F., Campen, J.B., 2005. Jaarrondberekeningen aan energieproducerende tuinbouwkas (Year-round Calculations on Energy Producing Glasshouse). WUR, Wageningen.
10. Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Green, K. (Eds.), 2004. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham.
11. Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Leeuwis, C., van Mierlo, B., 2011. Normative contestation in transitions 'in the making': animal welfare concerns and system innovation in pig husbandry. Research Policy 40 (2), 263-275.
12. Geels, F.W., 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31 (2002), 1257-1274.
13. Geels, F.W., 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33 (6-7), 897-920.
14. Geels, F.W., 2005. Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio-technical Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham.
15. Geels, F.W., 2006. The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840-1930): the dynamics of regime transformation. Research Policy 35, 1069-1082.
16. Geels, F.W., 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1), 24-40.
17. Geels, F.W., Schot, J.W., 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36 (3), 399-417.
18. Genus, A., Coles, A.-M., 2008. Rethinking the multilevel perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy 37 (9), 1436-1445.
19. Grin, J., van Staveren, A., 2007. Werken aan Systeeminnovaties (Working on System Innovations). Van Gorcum, Assen.
20. Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J.W., Truffer, B., 2002. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. Spon Press, London/New York.
21. Howells, J., 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35, 715-728.
22. Innogrow, 2005. GeslotenKas® bij Prominent bijna in bedrijf (Closed glasshouse at pominent (an association of 22 growers) almost in operation). Innogrow Electronic Newsletter 7 http://innogrow.email-service4.nl/archief/mailing-43794.html
23. InnovatieNetwerk, 2007. Zonnewarmte uit kassen voor 2800 woningen in Waddinxveen? (Solar heat from glasshouses for 2800 houses in Waddinxveen?). InnovatieNetwerk Nieuwsbrief (January).
24. Kemp, R., Grin, J., 2009. Opschaling van transtitie-experimenten en verankering van systeeminnovatieve vernieuwing (Upscaling of Transition-Experiments and Anchoring of System Innovative Renewal). TNO, Delft.
25. Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C., 2008. Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure. Technovation 28, 364-378.
26. Koelemeijer, R., Kruitwagen, S., 2007. Milieubalans 2007 (Environmental Balance 2007). Milieu en Natuur Planbureau, Bilthoven.
27. Leeuwis, C., Aarts, N., 2011. Rethinking communication in innovation processes: creating space for change in complex systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17, 21-36.
28. LEI Data. These data are taken from statistics pages on the website of the WUR-Agricultural Economics Research Institute LEI: http://www3.lei.wur.nl/ltc/
29. Loeber, A., 2003. Inbreken in het gangbare: Transitiemanagement in de praktijk - De NIDO benadering (Breaking in into the Usual: Transition Management in Practice - The NIDO Approach). NIDO, Leeuwarden.
30. North, D.C., 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. PT and LNV, 2006. Programma Kas als Energiebron: Jaarplan 2007 (Programme Glasshouse as an Energy Source. Annual Workplan 2007). Productschap Tuinbouw (Horticultural Product Board) and Ministry of LNV, The Hague.
32. PT and LNV, 2007. Programma Kas als Energiebron: Jaarplan 2008 (Programme Glasshouse as an Energy Source. Annual Workplan 2008). Productschap Tuinbouw (Horticultural Product Board) and Ministry of LNV, The Hague.
33. Raven, R., 2007. Niche Accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: an assessment of differences and pitfalls. Energy Policy 35, 2390-2400.
34. Raven, R.P.J.M., Verbong, G., 2007. Multi-regime interactions in the Dutch energy sector: the case of combined heat and power technologies in the Netherlands 1970-2000. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 (4), 491-507.
35. Rip, A., Kemp, R., 1998. Technological change. In: Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp. 327-399.
36. Rogers, E.M., 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, Glencoe.
37. Roza, C., 2006. Kas als energiebron (Glasshouse as an Energy Source). InnovatieNetwerk and Stichting Innovatie Glastuinbouw, Utrecht/Bleiswijk.
38. Schot, J.W., 1998. The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation: the case of the Netherlands in the 19th century. History and Technology 14, 173-200.
39. Scott, W.R., 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
40. SenterNovem, 2006. Glastuinbouw heeft energieneutrale kas in 2020 al in het vizier ((Glasshouse horticulture has 2020 energy neutral glasshouse already in sight). SenterNovem Nieuws 13 December.
41. Smith, A., 2007. Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 (4), 427-450.
42. SNM and LTO-Glaskracht, 2007. Actieplan voor een klimaatneutrale glastuinbouw (Actionplan for a Climate Neutral Glasshouse Horticulture). Stichting Natuur & Milieu (Nature and Environment Fund)/LTO-Glaskracht, Utrecht.
43. SunnyTom, 2007. Van tomatenteler tot energieleverancier (From Tomato Grower to Energy Supplier). Leaflet on greenport glasshouse. Further info on www.greenportkas.nl
44. Utterback, J.M., 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
45. van de Poel, I., 2000. On the role of outsiders in technical development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12 (3), 383-397.
46. van der Velden, N., Smit, P., 2007. Energiemonitor van de Nederlandse glastuinbouw 2000-2006 (Energy Monitor for the Dutch Glasshouse Horticulture 2000-2006). LEI, The Hague.
47. van Mierlo, B., 2012. Convergent and divergent learning in photovoltaic pilot projects and subsequent niche development. Sustainability, Science, Practice, & Policy 8 (2), Downloadable from: http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol8iss2/0901-002.vanmierlo.html
48. van Oosten, H., Koehorst, H., 2007. Toekomstsignalen (Signals of the Future). Stichting Innovatie Glastuinbouw and InnovatieNetwerk, Bleiswijk/Utrecht.
49. van Vliet, M., 2006. Vijf tips om te winnen met WKK (Five tips to win with CHP). Weekblad Groenten & Fruit, week 29.
50. Verbong, G., 2001. Omgevingsenergie en energieopslag. In: Verbong, G., van Selm, A., Knoppers, R., Raven, R. (Eds.), Een kwestie van lange adem: De geschiednis van duurzame energie in Nederland (A Matter of Long Breath: The History of Sustainable Energy in The Netherlands). Aeneas, Boxtel, pp. 295-318.
51. Vermeulen, T., Poot, E., 2008. Transitie en Toeleveranciers (Transition and Suppliers). WUR Glastuinbouw, Bleiswijk.
52. Wijnands, J.H.M., Deneux, S.D.C., van Paassen, R.A.F., Poot, E.H., van Woerden, S.C., 2003. Op kop: Internationale concurrentiepositie en strategie Nederlandse glastuinbouw (In the Lead: International Competitive Position and Strategy Dutch Glasshouse Horticulture). WUR-LEI/PPO, The Hague/Naaldwijk.