Recurrence of prolapse after transvaginal mesh excision

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 202-205

  George, Amy ^a   Mattingly, Marlena ^a   Woodman, Patrick ^a   Hale, Douglass ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Mesh excision; Prolapse recurrence

Indexed keywords

FLOORS; PATIENT REHABILITATION; REPAIR; SURVEYS;

COHORT ANALYSIS; MESH EXCISION; PARTIAL MESH; PATIENT POPULATION; PROLAPSE RECURRENCE; REOPERATION;

PATIENT TREATMENT;

ACETABULUM PROSTHESIS; ADULT; ANTERIOR INTRAVAGINAL SLINGPLASTY; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPLETE MESH EXCISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DYSPAREUNIA; EROSION; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; HYMEN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MESH SLING; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PARTIAL MESH EXCISION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE QUANTIFICATION SYSTEM; RECTUM INJURY; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE REPAIR; TOTAL MESH REMOVAL; TRANSVAGINAL SLING; URETHRA INJURY; VAGINAL SUPPORT DEVICE; AGED; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTOR; SUBURETHRAL SLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84883048380     PISSN: 21518378     EISSN: 21544212     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31829098a5     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:712-716.
2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:501-506.
3. Schultz DG. FDA Public Health Notification: Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence [FDAwebsite]. 2011.Available at:www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/⋯/ucm061976.htm. Accessed April 4, 2012.
4. Iglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, et al. Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:293-303.
5. Aungst MJ, Friedman EB, von Pechmann WS, et al. De novo stress incontinence and pelvic muscle symptoms after transvaginal mesh repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:73.e1-73.e7.
6. Vaginal Placement of Synthetic Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 513, December 2011.
7. Caquant F, Collinet P, Debodinance P, et al. Safety of transvaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008;34:449-456.
8. Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 2011;30(1):2-12.
9. Ridgeway B, Walters M, Paraiso M, et al. Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:703.e1-703.e7.
10. Nygaard I, Thom DH, Calhoun EA. Urinary incontinence in women. In: Urologic Diseases in America. NIH publication No. 07-5512. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, National Institutes of Health.
11. Clark AL, Gregory T, Smith VJ, et al. Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1261.
12. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:600-609.
13. Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:372-377.
14. Marcus-Braun N, von Theobald P. Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:423-430.