Gel encapsulation of glucose nanosensors for prolonged in vivo lifetime

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 53-61

  Balaconis, Mary K ^a   Clark, Heather A ^b  

^a Northeastern University   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Glucose nanosensors; Injectable gels; Optode

Indexed keywords

GELLING AGENT; GLUCOSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE; GEL; GEL ENCAPSULATION; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE NANOSENSOR; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MICROPLATE READER; MOUSE; NANOENCAPSULATION; NANOFABRICATION; NANOSENSOR; NONHUMAN; PERMEABILITY; PRODUCTIVITY; RIGIDITY; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT; GENETIC PROCEDURES; METHODOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; BLOOD GLUCOSE; GELS; MICE; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84883030190     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700107     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. P050012/S001. STS-7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System. 2007. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently- ApprovedDevices/ucm076983.htm.
2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. P980022/S015. Paradigm REAL-Time and Guardian REAL-Time Systems. 2007. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently- ApprovedDevices/ucm077026.htm.
3. Wang J. Electrochemical glucose biosensors. Chem Rev. 2008;108(2):814-25. (Pubitemid 351344456)
4. Pickup JC, Zhi ZL, Khan F, Saxl T, Birch DJ. Nanomedicine and its potential in diabetes research and practice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24(8):604-10.
5. Steiner MS, Duerkop A, Wolfbeis OS. Optical methods for sensing glucose. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40(9):4805-39.
6. Cash KJ, Clark HA. Nanosensors and nanomaterials for monitoring glucose in diabetes. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16(12):584-93.
7. Chaudhary A, Harma H, Hanninen P, McShane MJ, Srivastava R. Glucose response of near-infrared alginate-based microsphere sensors under dynamic reversible conditions. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(8):827-35.
8. D'Auria S, Herman P, Rossi M, Lakowicz JR. The fluorescence emission of the apo-glucose oxidase from aspergillus niger as probe to estimate glucose concentrations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;263(2):550-3. (Pubitemid 29467232)
9. Wang QS, Li GQ, Mao WY, Qi HX, Li GW. Glucose-responsive vesicular sensor based on boronic acid-glucose recognition in the ARS/PBA/ DBBTAB covesicles. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2006;119(2):695-700.
10. Billingsley K, Balaconis MK, Dubach JM, Zhang N, Lim E, Francis KP, Clark HA. Fluorescent nano-optodes for glucose detection. Anal Chem. 2010;82(9):3707-13.
11. Balaconis MK, Billingsley K, Dubach MJ, Cash KJ, Clark HA. The design and development of fluorescent nano-optodes for in vivo glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(1):68-75.
12. Clark HA, Hoyer M, Philbert MA, Kopelman R. Optical nanosensors for chemical analysis inside single living cells. 1. Fabrication, characterization, and methods for intracellular delivery of PEBBLE sensors. Anal Chem. 1999;71(21):4831-6.
13. Dubach JM, Harjes DI, Clark HA. Fluorescent ion-selective nanosensors for intracellular analysis with improved lifetime and size. Nano Lett. 2007;7(6):1827-31. (Pubitemid 47140468)
14. Gopee NV, Roberts DW, Webb P, Cozart CR, Siitonen PH, Warbritton AR, Yu WW, Colvin VL, Walker NJ, Howard PC. Migration of intradermally injected quantum dots to sentinel organs in mice. Toxicol Sci. 2007;98(1):249-57. (Pubitemid 47078755)
15. Ozaydin-Ince G, Dubach JM, Gleason KK, Clark HA. Microworm optode sensors limit particle difusion to enable in vivo measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):2656-61.
16. Li Y, Rodrigues J, Tomás H. Injectable and biodegradable hydrogels: gelation, biodegradation and biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(6):2193-221.
17. Kleinman HK, Martin GR. Matrigel: basement membrane matrix with biological activity. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15(5):378-86. (Pubitemid 41140305)
18. Serban MA, Scott A, Prestwich GD. Use of hyaluronan-derived hydrogels for three-dimensional cell culture and tumor xenografts. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2008;Chapter 10:Unit 10.14.
19. Zaman MH, Trapani LM, Sieminski AL, Mackellar D, Gong H, Kamm RD, Wells A, Laufenburger DA, Matsudaira P. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stifness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(29):10889-94. (Pubitemid 44148391)
20. Suckow MA, Danneman P, Brayton C. The laboratory mouse. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000.
21. Hannoun BJ, Stephanopoulos G. Difusion coeficients of glucose and ethanol in cell-free and cell-occupied calcium alginate membranes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1986;28(6):829-35. (Pubitemid 16568386)
22. Teixeira JA, Mota M, Venâncio A. Model identification and difusion coeficients determination of glucose and malic acid in calcium alginate membranes. Chem Eng J Biochem Eng J. 1994;56(1):B9-14.
23. Wu DQ, Zhang GL, Shen C, Zhao Q, Li H, Meng Q. Evaluation of difusion in gel entrapment cell culture within hollow fibers. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(11):1599-604. (Pubitemid 40520798)
24. Amsden B. Solute difusion within hydrogels. Mechanisms and models. Macromolecules. 1998;31(23):8382-95. (Pubitemid 128563527)
25. Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF, Franco M, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res. 2000;299(1):39-46. (Pubitemid 30028721)