Comparing innovation performance and science in society in the european member states

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 732-740

  Tsipouri, Lena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Innovation performance; Science in society; Scoreboards

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY MAKING;

EUROPE;

EID: 84883002730     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scs091     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barben, D. (2010) 'Analyzing acceptance politics: Towards an epistemological shift in the public understanding of science and technology', Public Understanding of Science, 19: 274-92.
2. Besley, J. C. (2010) 'Imagining public engagement', Public Understanding of Science, 21: 590-605.
3. Bijker, W. E. and d'Andrea, L., eds, (2009) 'Handbook on the Socialisation of Scientific and Technological Research: Social Science and European Research Capacities (SS-ERC) Project', pp. 190-203. Rome: Social Sciences and European Research Capacities.
4. Braun, K. and Schultz, S. (2010) ' ". . . a certain amount of engineering involved": Constructing the public in participatory governance arrangements', Public Understanding of Science, 19: 403-19.
5. Delgado, A., Kjølberg, K. L. and Wickson, F. (2010) 'Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology', Public Understanding of Science, 20: 826-45.
6. Dijkstra, A. M., Gutteling, J. M., Swart, J. A. A., Wieringa, N. F. et al. (2010) 'Public participation in genomics research in the Netherlands: Validating a measurement scale', Public Understanding of Science, 21: 465-77.
7. European Commission. (2004) 'Facing the challenge, The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment'. Report from the High-level Group, chaired by Wim Kok. Brussels: European Commission.
8. European Commission. (2009) 'Challenging futures of science in society, emerging trends and cutting-edge issues'. Brussels: European Commission.
9. European Commission. (2010) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 'Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative, Innovation Union', COM(2010) 546 final. Brussels: European Commission.
10. European Commission. (2012) Innovation Union, Scoreboard 2011, Research and Innovation Union Scoreboard. Brussels: European Commission.
11. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R., eds, (2004) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford, UK: OUP.
12. Hom, G. A., Plaza, R. M. and Palmén, R. (2011) 'The framing of risk and implications for policy and governance: The case of EMF', Public Understanding of Science, 20: 319-33.
13. Jasanoff, S (2008) 'Trading uncertainties: The transatlantic divide in regulating biotechnology', CESifo DICE Research Report 2/2008.
14. Kleinman, D. L., Delborne., J. A. and Anderson, A. A. (2011) 'Engaging citizens: The high cost of citizen participation in high technology', Public Understanding of Science, 20: 221-40.
15. Moore, A. (2010) 'Public bioethics and public engagement: The politics of "proper talk" ', Public Understanding of Science, 19: 197-211.
16. Neresini, F. and Bucchi, M. (2011) 'Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions', Public Understanding of Science, 20: 64-79.
17. Rickard, L. N. (2011) 'In backyards, on front lawns: Examining informal risk communication and communicators', Public Understanding of Science, 20: 642-57.
18. Riesch, H. (2011) 'Changing news: Re-adjusting science studies to online newspapers', Public Understanding of Science, 20: 771-7.
19. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. and Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010) Mismeasuring Our Lives. New York: The New Press.
20. Suleski, J. and Ibaraki, M. (2010) 'Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: A quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media', Public Understanding of Science, 19: 115-25.
21. Torres-Albero, C., Ferná ndez-Esquinas, M., Rey-Rocha, J. and Martín-Sempere, M. J. (2011) 'Dissemination practices in the Spanish research system: Scientists trapped in a golden cage', Public Understanding of Science, 20: 12-25.
22. Veen, M., Gremmen, B., te Molder, H. and van Woerkum, C. (2011) 'Emergent technologies against the background of everyday life: Discursive psychology as a technology assessment tool', Public Understanding of Science, 20: 810-25.