Socio-ecological accounting: DPSWR, a modified DPSIR framework, and its application to marine ecosystems

Ecological Economics

Volumn 94, Issue , 2013, Pages 106-115

  Cooper, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ecosystem approach; Environmental accounting; Marine ecosystems; Socio ecological accounting

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS;

EUROPE;

EID: 84882972275     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Atkins J.P., Burdon D., Elliott M., Gregory A.J. Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2011, 62:215-226.
2. BFF City Limits: A Resource Flow and Ecological Footprint Analysis of Greater London 2002, Best Foot Forward Ltd., Oxford.
3. Bowen R.E., Riley C. Socio-economic indicators and integrated coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management 2003, 46:299-312.
4. Environment Canada Vision and Guiding Principles available at, (last accessed 30 August 2012). http://www.ec.gc.ca/ap-pa/default.asp?lang=En&n=E41EDD3B-1.
5. Cave R.R., Ledoux L., Turner K., Jickells T., Andrews J.E., Davies H. The Humber catchment and its coastal area: from UK to European perspectives. The Science of the Total Environment 2003, 314:31-52.
6. CBD Ecosystem Approach, Decision V6 of the Fifth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, CBD Handbook 2000, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. 3rd edition.
7. Chambers R.J. Accounting, Evaluation and Economic Behavior 1966, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
8. EEA Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview. Technical report No.25 1999, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
9. EEA Are We Moving in the Right Direction? Indicators on Transport and Environment Integration in the EU, Environmental Issues Series No.12 2000, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
10. EEA Europe's Environment: The Fourth Assessment 2007, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
11. EEA Environmental Terminology and Discovery Service available at, (last accessed 30 August 2012). http://glossary.eea.europa.eu/.
12. EU Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Parliament 2008, L164:19-40.
13. Eurostat Towards Environmental Pressure Indicators for the EU 1999, Eurostat, Luxembourg. 1st edition.
14. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:643-653.
15. Friend A. Frameworks for environmental statistics: recent experience of Statistics Canada. Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environment Statistics: A Stress-response Approach 1979, Statistics Canada, Ottawa. D. Rapport, A. Friend (Eds.).
16. Gobin A., Jones R., Kirkby M., Campling P., Govers G., Kosmas C., Gentile A.R. Indicators for pan-European assessment and monitoring of soil erosion by water. Environmental Science and Policy 2004, 7(1):25-38.
17. Gowdy J.M. The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental valuation and policy. Land Economics 2004, 80(2):239-257.
18. Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1995, 8(2):47-77.
19. GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Version 3.1 2011, Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam.
20. Grumbine R.E. What is ecosystem management?. Conservation Biology 1994, 8:27-38.
21. Hamilton K., Clemens M. Genuine saving in developing countries. World Bank Economic Review 1999, 13(2):333-356.
22. Heal G. Environmental accounting for ecosystems. Ecological Economics 2007, 63:693-694.
23. Lawn P. A stock-take of green national accounting initiatives. Social Indicators Research 2007, 80:427-460.
24. Maxim L., Spangenberg J.H., O'Connor M. An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework. Ecological Economics 2009, 69:12-23.
25. McFadden K.W., Barnes C. The implementation of an ecosystem approach to management within a federal government agency. Marine Policy 2009, 33:156-163.
26. O'Neill J. Value pluralism, incommensurability and institutions. Valuing Nature 1997, Routledge, London. J. Foster (Ed.).
27. OECD Environmental Policy Benefits: Monetary Valuation 1989, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
28. OECD OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews, Environment Monographs No. 83 1993, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
29. OECD OECD Environmental Indicators: Development, Measurement and Use, Reference Paper 2003, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
30. Pearce D.W., Atkinson G. Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of weak sustainability. Ecological Economics 1993, 8:103-108.
31. Perrings C. Reserved rationality and the precautionary principle: technological change, time and uncertainty in environmental decision making. Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability 1991, Columbia University Press, New York. R. Costanza (Ed.).
32. Sagoff M. Price, Principle and the Environment 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Schaltegger S., Burritt R. Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concepts and Practice 2000, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield.
34. Schulze I., Colby M. A Conceptual Framework to Support the Development and Use of Environmental Information, EPA 230 R 94 012 1994, Environmental Statistics and Information Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
35. Turner R.K. The place of economic values in environmental valuation. Valuing Environmental Preferences 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford. I.J. Bateman, K.G. Willis (Eds.).
36. Turner R.K. Integrating natural and socio-economic science in coastal management. Journal of Marine Systems 2000, 25:447-460.
37. Turner R.K., Lorenzoni I., Beaumont N., Bateman I.J., Langford I.H., McDonald A.L. Coastal management for sustainable development: analysing environmental and socio-economic changes on the UK coast. The Geographical Journal 1998, 164(3):269-281.
38. Turner R.K., Georgiou S., Brouwer R., Bateman I.J., Langford I. Towards an integrated environmental assessment for wetland and catchment management. The Geographical Journal 2003, 169(2):99-116.
39. UN Survey of Environment Statistics: Frameworks, Approaches and Statistical Publications, Statistical Papers Series M, No. 73 1977, United Nations Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, Statistical Office, New York.
40. UN A Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics, Statistical Papers Series M, No. 78 1984, United Nations Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, Statistical Office, New York.
41. UN Concepts and Methods of Environment Statistics: Statistics of the Natural Environment, Studies in Methods Series F, No. 57 1991, United Nations Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, Statistical Office, New York.
42. UNSD Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting, Handbook of National Statistics, Studies in Methods Series F, No. 61 Rev.1 2003, United Nations Statistical Division, New York.
43. UNSD System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, Central Framework 2012, United Nations Statistical Division, New York.
44. Wackernagel M., Onisto L., Bello P., Callejas Linares A., López Falfán I.S., Méndez García J., Suárez Guerrero A.I., Guerrero Suárez, Ma G. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics 1999, 29:375-390.
45. Wieringa K. Towards integrated environmental assessment support for the European Community's environmental action programme process. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 1999, 11(4):525-541.