Differences of online and face-to-face peer reviews regarding type and quality

IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, CELDA 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 423-428

  Bauer, Christine ^a   Figl, Kathrin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Online assessment; Online collaboration; Peer reviews

Indexed keywords

IT PROJECT MANAGEMENTS; ON-LINE ASSESSMENT; ON-LINE COLLABORATIONS; ON-LINE SETTING; ONLINE VERSIONS; PEER REVIEW; TIME-EFFICIENT;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84882967348     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Derntl, M. 2006. A Generic View on Web-Supported Peer-Evaluation, Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, Orlando.
2. Dochy, F., Segers, M. and Sluijsmans, D. 1999. The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A review, In Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 331-350.
3. Figl, K., Bauer, C. and Mangler, J. 2006. Online versus Face-to-Face Peer Team Reviews, Proceedings of ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego.
4. Gehringer, E. F. 2000. Strategies and Mechanisms for Electronic Peer Review, Proceedings of ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
5. Hanson, J. G. 2005. Cooperative Learning Methods and the Teaching of English Writing: Peer Response, In STETS Language & Communication Review, Vol. 4.
6. Huang, S. Y. 1998. A comparison between Chinese EFL students' peer response sessions held on networked computers and those held in a FF setting, (Ed, Lansing, E.) National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
7. Liu, J. and Sadler, R. W. 2003. The effects and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing, In English for Academic Purposes, Vol. 2, pp. 193-227.
8. Mashayekhi, V., and Drake., J. M., Tsai, W. and Riedl, J. 1993. Distributed, Collaborative Software Inspection, In IEEE Software, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 66-75.
9. Sullivan, N. and Pratt, E. 1996. A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom, In System, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 491-501.
10. Trahasch, S. 2004. From Peer Assessment Towards Collaborative Learning., Proceedings of 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
11. Wiegers, K. E. 2002. Seven Truths About Peer Reviews, In Cutter IT Journal, Vol. 15, No. 7.