Using data envelopment analysis for supplier evaluation with environmental considerations

SysCon 2013 - 7th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 20-24

  Zhe, Sun ^a   Wong, T N ^a   Lee, L H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

DEA; Environmental Consideration; Supplier selection

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVE SUPPLY CHAINS; DEA; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS; SUPPLIER SELECTION; SUPPLIER SELECTION PROCESS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; SUPPLY CHAINS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84882950402     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SysCon.2013.6549852     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
2. Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of purchasing, 2(1), 5-17.
3. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), 2-18.
4. Cheraghi, S. H., Dadashzadeh, M., & Subramanian, M. (2011). Critical success factors for supplier selection: an update. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 20(2).
5. Noci, G. (1997). Designing [] green'vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier's environmental performance. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 3(2), 103-114.
6. Gerde, V. W., & Logsdon, J. M. (2001). Measuring environmental performance: use of the toxics release inventory (TRI) and other US environmental databases. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(5), 269-285.
7. Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70-87.
8. Humphreys, P., Wong, Y., & Chan, F. (2003). Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138(1), 349-356.
9. Lu, L. Y. Y., Wu, C., & Kuo, T. C. (2007). Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4317-4331.
10. Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F., & Hung, H. C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7917-7927.
11. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 370-378.
12. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Desai, A. (1998). Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 108(1), 208-223.
13. Aksoy, A., & Öztürk, N. (2011). Supplier selection and performance evaluation in just-in-time production environments. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6351-6359.
14. Dudek, G., & Stadtler, H. (2005). Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chains partners. European Journal of Operational Research, 163(3), 668-687.
15. Talluri, S. (2002). A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 171-180.
16. Liu, F. H. F., & Hsuan Peng, H. (2008). Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights. Computers & operations research, 35(5), 1624-1637.