Diachronic Morphological Typology

Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 509-515

  Harris, A ^a   Xu, Z ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affix; Agglutinating; Analytic; Circumfix; Diachronic; Fusional; Infix; Inflecting; Isolating; Morphology; Prefix; Suffix; Suffixing preference; Synthetic; Typology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882893115     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00186-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Blust R. Three notes on early Austronesian morphology. Oceanic Linguistics 2003, 42:438-478.
2. Bybee J.L. The diachronic dimension in explanation 1988, 350-379. J.L. Hawkins (Ed.).
3. Bybee, Pagliuca W., Perkins R.D. On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. Studies in typology and diachrony: papers presented to Joseph H Greenberg on his 75th birthday 1990, 1-42. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. W. Croft, K. Denning, S. Kemmer (Eds.).
4. Comrie B. Morphology and word order reconstruction: problems and prospects. Historical morphology 1980, 83-96. Mouton, The Hague. J. Fisiak (Ed.).
5. Comrie B. Language universals and linguistic typology 1988, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Crowley T. An introduction to historical linguistics 1992, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd edn.
7. Givón T. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archaeologist's field trip. Chicago Linguistic Society 1971, 7:394-415.
8. Greenberg J.H. Order of affixing: a study in general linguistics. Essays in linguistics 1957, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Greenberg J.H. How does a language acquire gender markers?. Universals of human language 1978, 2:47-82. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA. J.H. Greenberg, C.A. Ferguson, E.A. Moravcsik (Eds.).
10. Hall C. Integrating diachronic and processing principles in explaining the suffixing preference 1988, 321-349. A.C. Hawkins (Ed.).
11. Harris, Campbell L. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Harris M.B. The evolution of French syntax: a comparative approach 1978, Longman, London.
13. Explaining language universals 1988, Blackwell, Oxford.
14. Hawkins J.A., Cutler A. Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmetry 1988, 280-317. J.A. Hawkins (Ed.).
15. Hawkins, Gilligan G. Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order. Lingua 1988, 74:219-259.
16. Hintze F. Die Haupttendenzen der ägyptischen Sprachentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 1947, 1:85-107.
17. Hodge C.T. The linguistic cycle. The Language Sciences 1970, 13:1-7.
18. Kahr J.C. The renewal of case morphology: sources and constraints. Working Papers on Language Universals 1976, 20:107-151.
19. Kraehenmann A & Plank F (forthcoming). 'Words without vowels in Upper German: clitics wanting to be affixes.' Manuscript, University of Konstanz.
20. Lord C. Historical change in serial verb constructions 1993, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
21. Martin J.B. Implications of plural reduplication, infixation, and subtraction for Muskogean subgrouping. Anthropological Linguistics 1994, 36:27-55.
22. Martin J.B., Munro P. Proto-Muskogean morphology. The native languages of the southeastern United States 2005, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. J. Scancarelli, H. Hardy (Eds.).
23. Oinas F. The development of some postpositional cases in Balto-Finnic languages 1961, Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, Helsinki.
24. Reh M. Where have all the case prefixes gone?. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 1986, 5:121-134.
25. Sapir E. Language 1921, Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York.
26. Siewierska A., Bakker D. The distribution of subject and object agreement and word order type. Studies in Language 1996, 20:115-161.
27. Steele S. Clisis and diachrony. Mechanisms of syntactic change 1977, 539-579. University of Texas Press, Austin. C.N. Li (Ed.).
28. Yu A.C. The morphology and phonology of infixation 2003, Unpublished dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.