George berkeley, the analyst (1734)

Landmark Writings in Western Mathematics 1640-1940

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 121-130

  Jesseph, D ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882872621     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-044450871-3/50089-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. Blay M. Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal. Revue d'histoire des sciences 1986, 39:223-253.
2. Breidert W. Berkeleys Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung. Studia Leibnitiana. Sonderheft 14 1986, 185-191. Steiner, Stuttgart. A. Heinekamp (Ed.).
3. Breidert W. George Berkeley 1685-1753 1989, (Vita mathematica, vol. 4), Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, and Berlin.
4. Cajori F. A history of the conceptions of limits and fluxions in Great Britain from Newton to Woodhouse 1919, Open Court, Chicago.
5. Cantor G. Berkeley's Analyst revisited. Isis 1984, 75:668-683.
6. Grattan-Guinness I. Berkeley's criticism of the calculus as a study in the theory of limits. Janus 1969, 56:215-227. [Printing correction, 57 (1970: publ. 1971), 80.].
7. Hughes M. Newton, Hermes, and Berkeley. British journal for the philosophy of science 1992, 43:1-19.
8. Jesseph D.M. Berkeley's philosophy of mathematics 1993, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Sherry D. The wake of Berkeley's analyst: rigor mathematicae?. Studies in history and philosophy of science 1987, 24:455-480.
10. Stock J. An account of the life of George Berkeley 1776, J. Murray, London.
11. Wisdom J.O. The Analyst controversy: Berkeley's influence on the development of mathematics. Hermathena 1939, 54:3-29.
12. Wisdom J.O. The Analyst controversy: Berkeley as a mathematician. Hermathena 1942, 59:111-128.