Economic considerations in the endangered species debate: The case of the piping plover

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 1-15

  Gilbert, Laura A ^a   Halstead, John M ^b  

^a Cadmus Group Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Endangered species; Impact analysis; Piping plover; Tourism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882806667     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871209709359098     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alward, G.S. (1985). Local and regional economic impacts of outdoor recreation development. A literature review. The President’s Commission on Americans Outdoors.
2. Bell, F. W., & Leeworthy, V.R. (1986). An economic analysis of the importance of saltwater beaches in Florida. Report no. 82. Gainesville, FL: Florida Sea Grant College.
3. Brookshire, D.S., Eubanks, L.S., & Randall, A. (1983). Estimating option prices and existence values for wildlife resources. Land Economics. 59(1): 1-15.
4. Cape Cod National Seashore (CCNS), National Park Service. Annual attendance records 1986 -1993
5. Ehrenfeld, David. (1978). The arrogance of humanism. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Gilbert, L.A., Jansen, E.F., Halstead, J.M., & Robertson, R.A. (1994).Economic and social impacts of the Parker River National Wildlife Refuge and its piping plover management program. New Hampshire AESReport No. 131.
7. Halstead, J.M., Luloff, A.E., & Stevens, T.H. (1992). Protestbiddersin contingent valuation. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 21 (2): 160-169.
8. Mann, C.C., & Plummer, M.L. (1992, January).The butterfly problem. The Atlantic Monthly, p. 47-70.
9. Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management. (1994). Guidelines for barrier beach management in Massachusetts -A report ofthe Massachusetts barrier beach task force.
10. Massachusetts Office of Travel and Tourism. (1992). The economic impact of U.S. travel on Massachusetts counties: 1990. Prepared by the U.S. Travel Data Center.
11. McNeely, J.A., Miller, K.R., Reid, W.V., Mittermeier, R.A., & Werner, T.B. (1990). Conserving the world’s biological diversity. Washington, D.C.: International Union for Conservation of Natural and Natural Resources, World Resources Institute, Conservation International, World Wildlife Fund-US, and the World Bank.
12. Melvin, S. M., Griffin, C. R., & Maclvor, L.H. (1991). Recovery strategies for piping plovers in managed coastal landscapes. Coastal Management, 19:21-34.
13. Newburyport Daily News. (1991, April 10, p. 1). Beach decision possible.
14. Newburyport Daily News. (1991, April 12, p. 1). Miles of Plum Island sand remain open to public, refuge beach to stay closed.
15. Parker River National Wildlife Refuge. Annual attendance records, 1971-1993.
16. Parker River National Wildlife Refuge. 1988 Annual Report - 1992 Annual Report.
17. Parker River National Wildlife Refuge. (1993). Piping plover and least tern management program report.
18. Samples, K., Dixon, J.A., & Gowen, M.M. (1986). Information disclosure and Endangered species valuation. Land Economics. 62(3): 292-305.
19. Shultz, S.D., & Luloff, A.E. (1990). The threat of nonresponse bias to survey research. Journal of the Community Development Society. 21(2): 104-116.
20. Smith, R.L. (1996). Ecology and field biology. (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
21. Stevens, T.H., More, T.A., & Glass, R.J. (1994). CV bids for wildlife existence. Land Economics. 70(3): 355-363.
22. Stoll, J., & Johnson, L.A. (1984). Concepts of value, nonmarket valuation, and the case of the whooping crane. Transactions of the 49th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C.
23. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1987). U.S. Census of Retail Trade: Massachusetts.
24. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1993). 1991 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation.
25. Walsh, R. G., & Loomis, J.B. (1986). The contribution of recreation to national economic development. A literature review. The President’s Commission on Americans Outdoors.
26. Waters, E.C., Holland, D.W., & Weber, B.A. (1994). Interregional effects of reduced timber harvests: The impact of the northern spotted owl listing in rural and urban Oregon. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 19(1): 141-160.